Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:wa9als@starband.net: 227 ]

Total 227 documents matching your query.

81. [RTTY] Addendum Re: [WriteLog] N1RCT's interface page still avail (score: 1)
Author: wa9als@starband.net (WA9ALS - John)
Date: Sat, 13 Apr 2002 19:15:34 -0500
I guess I should add 2 comments: 1. Dick's diagrams use DTR instead of RTS for PTT - This depends on which software you're using. WriteLog has PTT on RTS and CW on DTR. 2. Dick's page also shows the
/archives//html/RTTY/2002-04/msg00110.html (7,009 bytes)

82. [RTTY] spammmm (score: 1)
Author: wa9als@starband.net (WA9ALS - John)
Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2002 08:05:56 -0500
Just got some spam from the rtty list! -- Original Message -- From: "Winny" <xedkdmvp@yahoo.com> To: <71552.2062@compuserve.com>; <rtty@contesting.com>; <106711.1201@compuserve.com>; <rttompkins@aol.
/archives//html/RTTY/2002-04/msg00117.html (7,253 bytes)

83. [RTTY] A71EM ON RTTY NOW - WAKE UP PHIL! (score: 1)
Author: wa9als@starband.net (WA9ALS - John)
Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2002 22:35:58 -0500
Ugly - Why doesn't he split?
/archives//html/RTTY/2002-04/msg00145.html (6,602 bytes)

84. [RTTY] New URL Re: [Dx4win] MMTTY and DX4WIN (score: 1)
Author: wa9als@starband.net (WA9ALS - John)
Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2002 21:59:06 -0500
I went ahead and made a page with links to the above files for future reference. There's also a link from my homepage now. For the rightfully paranoid (of rtf files etc), I also copied the actual te
/archives//html/RTTY/2002-04/msg00207.html (7,192 bytes)

85. [RTTY] Implications of remote control (score: 1)
Author: wa9als@starband.net (WA9ALS - John)
Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2002 12:12:44 -0500
Yuck!
/archives//html/RTTY/2002-03/msg00128.html (7,810 bytes)

86. [RTTY] Implications of remote control (score: 1)
Author: wa9als@starband.net (WA9ALS - John)
Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2002 12:14:00 -0500
We already do - It's called - REFLECTORS! ;-))
/archives//html/RTTY/2002-03/msg00129.html (8,383 bytes)

87. [RTTY] Implications of remote control (score: 1)
Author: wa9als@starband.net (WA9ALS - John)
Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2002 18:25:40 -0500
Just curious - What can you do if the rig hangs in transmit? Do you have a special "kill" scenario available via WinVNC?
/archives//html/RTTY/2002-03/msg00144.html (8,041 bytes)

88. [RTTY] WA9ALS BARTG SOAB (score: 1)
Author: wa9als@starband.net (WA9ALS - John)
Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2002 23:01:30 -0500
BARTG 2002 HF RTTY Band QSO Area Cty Cont 80M 0 0 0 40M 34 10 4 20M 248 20 48 15M 301 23 50 10M 338 25 47 Total 921 78 149 6 Mults = 227 Total Score = 1,254,402 Time = 29:56 It might be hard to teach
/archives//html/RTTY/2002-03/msg00230.html (9,608 bytes)

89. [RTTY] Best RTTY rig? (score: 1)
Author: wa9als@starband.net (WA9ALS - John)
Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2002 20:37:42 -0500
And Yaesu seems to "derate" their stuff for RTTY to 50% power, whereas Icom does not. A lot of guys have said they run their 1000MPs at 100W in RTTY contesting, but Yaesu only recs 50W. Dependding o
/archives//html/RTTY/2002-03/msg00246.html (8,667 bytes)

90. [RTTY] Best RTTY rig? (score: 1)
Author: wa9als@starband.net (WA9ALS - John)
Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2002 22:21:08 -0500
Good point, Marty. I've burned up 2 traps on an R-7 and several baluns on Carolina Windoms finding the unadvertised melting points! Good reason to get Force 12! No melts! No critter-homes! No water
/archives//html/RTTY/2002-03/msg00251.html (9,540 bytes)

91. [RTTY] Best RTTY rig? (score: 1)
Author: wa9als@starband.net (WA9ALS - John)
Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2002 06:08:42 -0500
Just an FYI, having run the experiment a couple of times awhile back, an R-7 can take about 400W RTTY for "extended times" (like a minute or 2) The SWR will rise a bit when you first start a session
/archives//html/RTTY/2002-03/msg00255.html (9,170 bytes)

92. [RTTY] Best RTTY rig? CHEN's blown strap (score: 1)
Author: wa9als@starband.net (WA9ALS - John)
Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2002 06:16:30 -0500
bet Well, I didn't author the Cushcrap part above (although it made me smile), but maybe I should've said "Butternut HF9V" instead of just "Butternut". And Chen, if you lost something running 100W, I
/archives//html/RTTY/2002-03/msg00256.html (9,875 bytes)

93. [RTTY] N2WK pse email me - others delete - tnx (score: 1)
Author: wa9als@starband.net (WA9ALS - John)
Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2002 06:19:50 -0500
/archives//html/RTTY/2002-03/msg00257.html (6,272 bytes)

94. [RTTY] rtty afsk. (score: 1)
Author: wa9als@starband.net (WA9ALS - John)
Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2002 14:09:42 -0500
A button labeled "FSK" does not FSK make. I doubt the 990 is any different than the 1000MP in this regard. The connections and buttons are labeled FSK, but... as others have said, it surely uses an i
/archives//html/RTTY/2002-03/msg00268.html (7,715 bytes)

95. [RTTY] rtty afsk. (score: 1)
Author: wa9als@starband.net (WA9ALS - John)
Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2002 19:26:42 -0500
Don, we just want to know one thing while you're waiting... Are you really in a duck blind right now?? ;-)
/archives//html/RTTY/2002-03/msg00278.html (7,215 bytes)

96. [RTTY] keyed AFSK? - was: Best RTTY rig? (score: 1)
Author: wa9als@starband.net (WA9ALS - John)
Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2002 17:09:56 -0500
Ekki, you're hitting your DELETE key too fast! This was explained lots and lots yesterday! ;-) FSK - Digital signal shifts main oscillator of rig. AFSK - Usually external tones generated e.g. by an
/archives//html/RTTY/2002-03/msg00285.html (9,410 bytes)

97. [RTTY] keyed AFSK? - was: Best RTTY rig? (score: 1)
Author: wa9als@starband.net (WA9ALS - John)
Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2002 21:08:49 -0500
Yaesu signal Hi Goetz - Apparently I'll eat my hat on this one, but - It -does- still use an internal AFSK generator when using "FSK" (the RTTY input connector). I traded my MARK-V toward a PROII an
/archives//html/RTTY/2002-03/msg00294.html (10,764 bytes)

98. [RTTY] Best RTTY rig? (score: 1)
Author: wa9als@starband.net (WA9ALS - John)
Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2002 21:13:25 -0500
No, WA9ALS didn't write that! Oh well, I have had my share of smoking hunks of plastic. The traps on the R-7 and 3 Carolina Windom 160 baluns. So far, the HF9V and C31XR haven't picked up the habit
/archives//html/RTTY/2002-03/msg00296.html (8,202 bytes)

99. [RTTY] keyed AFSK? - was: Best RTTY rig? (score: 1)
Author: wa9als@starband.net (WA9ALS - John)
Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2002 21:40:53 -0500
Bill, why was this done? I suppose it was more copyable than voice under certain conditions? Reminds one of using a code practice oscillator on a 2M repeater...
/archives//html/RTTY/2002-03/msg00298.html (7,448 bytes)

100. [RTTY] Best RTTY rig? (score: 1)
Author: wa9als@starband.net (WA9ALS - John)
Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2002 16:03:41 -0500
Duane, somewhere the GAP says it's limited on RTTY on certain bands (?40 & 80), and their salemen will tell you this too. There's no visible traps, but they use a loop of coax inside that'll blow/mel
/archives//html/RTTY/2002-03/msg00319.html (10,372 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu