Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:wa9als@starband.net: 227 ]

Total 227 documents matching your query.

201. [RTTY] New 160 meter bandplan (score: 1)
Author: wa9als@starband.net (WA9ALS - John)
Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2001 16:35:41 -0500
I'll try to be there - I'd love to make my first 160M RTTY contact! You -are- talking about RTTY, right? ;-)
/archives//html/RTTY/2001-07/msg00334.html (7,192 bytes)

202. [RTTY] CQ 160M RTTY! (score: 1)
Author: wa9als@starband.net (WA9ALS - John)
Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2001 21:09:28 -0500
Don't everyone go to sleep! Bill forgot about how "early" we go to bed "out east"!! I'm there now with around 500W and 265 ft of wire - Can anyone try it now?? CQ CQ CQ 160 RTTY DE WA9ALS -- -- -- --
/archives//html/RTTY/2001-07/msg00344.html (8,116 bytes)

203. [RTTY] ARRL RR drops DX SO plaques this year (score: 1)
Author: wa9als@starband.net (WA9ALS - John)
Date: Sun, 29 Jul 2001 18:06:03 -0500
I noticed this in the rules for 2001, and I see plaques only awarded to DX for multi-op LP and HP. Last year they also gave them to single-op LP and HP DX. Anyone know why they decided to drop the si
/archives//html/RTTY/2001-07/msg00399.html (7,289 bytes)

204. [RTTY] RTTY ?? (score: 1)
Author: wa9als@starband.net (WA9ALS - John)
Date: Sun, 29 Jul 2001 18:30:16 -0500
Don't ask me WHY I kept this, but the link is http://www.hpaa.com/moslo/ Slowing down a computer to run programs "better" just doesn't make sense these days... Please don't flame me - you gotta do w
/archives//html/RTTY/2001-07/msg00400.html (7,392 bytes)

205. [RTTY] Calender of RTTY and address for WriteLog updates etc. (score: 1)
Author: wa9als@starband.net (WA9ALS - John)
Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2001 07:39:32 -0500
www.writelog.com for http://www.rttyjournal.com/contests/index.htm
/archives//html/RTTY/2001-07/msg00423.html (7,336 bytes)

206. [RTTY] WA9ALS/4 AKA Take Your Radio! (score: 1)
Author: wa9als@starband.net (WA9ALS - John)
Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2001 21:21:44 -0500
I had the privilege of operating /4 in the land of the Mandolins, Guitars, etc part of last week. This included some playing in the Russian RTTY test. This was a [XYL's] family reunion of sorts at a
/archives//html/RTTY/2001-07/msg00441.html (8,750 bytes)

207. Re: [RTTY] Re: [WriteLog] Re: wrong dates for SCC (score: 1)
Author: "WA9ALS - John" <wa9als@starband.net>
Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2003 06:53:47 -0500
OK, another off-topic post never seems to help, but I hit my frustration level. The post below is a reply to both RTTY and WRITELOG mailing lists about a thread that is as old as dirt. The SCC is thi
/archives//html/RTTY/2003-08/msg00029.html (10,553 bytes)

208. [RTTY] 1st USA (score: 1)
Author: "WA9ALS - John" <wa9als@starband.net>
Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2003 12:47:47 -0500
Thanks to NRJ and CQ Magazine for 1st USA, Multi-OP, Multi-Trans! We only had two transmitters, but there's nothing in the rules to prevent two transmitters from entering the Multi-Multi category. Kn
/archives//html/RTTY/2003-08/msg00034.html (6,989 bytes)

209. Re: [RTTY] W0ETC (score: 1)
Author: "WA9ALS - John" <wa9als@starband.net>
Date: Sun, 7 Sep 2003 20:10:00 -0500
Geez Larry, hit by lightning -and- shingles? I hope you bought a lottery ticket - the one-in-a-millions things seem to be finding you! At 55, I can't wait for my first shingles. Count your blessings
/archives//html/RTTY/2003-09/msg00043.html (7,308 bytes)

210. [RTTY] CQ Isabel (score: 1)
Author: "WA9ALS - John" <wa9als@starband.net>
Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2003 07:17:03 -0500
Are you EU-advantaged RTTYers battening down the QTH/antennas? _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
/archives//html/RTTY/2003-09/msg00073.html (6,530 bytes)

211. Re: [RTTY] LOTW for non-US stations (score: 1)
Author: "WA9ALS - John" <wa9als@starband.net>
Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2003 07:13:52 -0500
Even the US has to wait for a a password via snail mail. Anyone know how that works, i.e. is it computer-generated and in the mail "immediately" when you apply for a cert, or does it have to be proce
/archives//html/RTTY/2003-09/msg00081.html (9,651 bytes)

212. Re: [RTTY] OMNI VI+ and FSK (score: 1)
Author: "WA9ALS - John" <wa9als@starband.net>
Date: Sat, 27 Sep 2003 13:52:35 -0500
Ed, reverse polarity via rig menu/setting if the Omni permits that. Otherwise, if you used a transistor switch for your interface, just swap the transistor's base and emitter leads. 73 - John, WA9AL
/archives//html/RTTY/2003-09/msg00127.html (6,904 bytes)

213. Re: [RTTY] dumb question (score: 1)
Author: "WA9ALS - John" <wa9als@starband.net>
Date: Sat, 27 Sep 2003 19:00:51 -0500
Mike, real contesting programs are pretty smart about the exchange and will usually put the right thing in the right place in the log when you click on it no matter what order they're sent. However,
/archives//html/RTTY/2003-09/msg00130.html (7,462 bytes)

214. [WriteLog] Re: [RTTY] OMNI VI+ and FSK (score: 1)
Author: "WA9ALS - John" <wa9als@starband.net>
Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2003 15:28:11 -0500
Actually I do too, only with a 1K resistor. I've done that with the IC-706, PROII, and the 1000MP (regular and MARK-V) - works great. Several years now with this configuration. I added the 2n2222 tr
/archives//html/RTTY/2003-09/msg00138.html (7,567 bytes)

215. Re: [RTTY] W0YR/4 SOSB 20M (score: 1)
Author: "WA9ALS - John" <wa9als@starband.net>
Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2003 07:37:24 -0500
Nice log Mike! We all enjoyed seeing your log, name and address - everything! ;-)) -- -- START-OF-LOG: 2.0 ARRL-SECTION: VA CALLSIGN: W0YR/4 CATEGORY: SINGLE-OP 20M CATEGORY-OVERLAY: CLAIMED-SCORE: 1
/archives//html/RTTY/2003-09/msg00153.html (7,038 bytes)

216. [WriteLog] Re: [Dx4win] Importing a contest file and not getting state information (score: 1)
Author: "WA9ALS - John" <wa9als@starband.net>
Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2003 08:08:20 -0500
Hi Shelby - Maybe you could accomplish the same thing with the "Search and Replace" thing of a word processor? Sorry this post is wide bandwidth, but hey, it's plain text, and I think makes a good po
/archives//html/RTTY/2003-09/msg00155.html (10,983 bytes)

217. Re: [WriteLog] WL bug (score: 1)
Author: "WA9ALS - John" <wa9als@starband.net>
Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2003 06:54:46 -0500
Maybe every conceivable call would be a problem, but how much problem is size really? I used to think the old one was sort of silly since it undoubtedly had a lot of unused calls, and I thought it mi
/archives//html/RTTY/2003-09/msg00199.html (8,785 bytes)

218. Re: [RTTY] 3C0V important RTTY info (Long version) (score: 1)
Author: "WA9ALS - John" <wa9als@starband.net>
Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2003 20:59:26 -0500
also just might It seems Don, you've been diddling too long! Being focused on winning contests translates to many, many hours in front of the radio tweaking operating skills, rigs, setups, computers
/archives//html/RTTY/2003-09/msg00219.html (8,487 bytes)

219. Re: [RTTY] Another reason NOT to sign "portable" (score: 1)
Author: "WA9ALS - John" <wa9als@starband.net>
Date: Sat, 4 Oct 2003 08:30:55 -0500
Truly a mess, eh? They might as well stop giving out call area certs. I wouldn't want to be starting out in RTTY in a prop-challenged hole and have my area's cert always being won by a guy living in
/archives//html/RTTY/2003-10/msg00049.html (7,995 bytes)

220. Re: [RTTY] Another reason to sign "portable" (score: 1)
Author: "WA9ALS - John" <wa9als@starband.net>
Date: Sat, 4 Oct 2003 18:24:24 -0500
K5ZD not NOT Not to mention beam headings. Sometimes I'm shocked when the beam is pointed west and a "weak W6" answers. Finally I find out he's in MA. _______________________________________________
/archives//html/RTTY/2003-10/msg00053.html (7,065 bytes)

Current List: 201 - 220
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12]
This search system is powered by Namazu