Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:wa5zup@msn.com: 36 ]

Total 36 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [RTTY] Any ND or ME using LoTW? (score: 1)
Author: John Elsik <wa5zup@msn.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 14:21:40 -0700
Yes WAS via only LOTW adds to the challenge! I did not want to hassle with sending cards in. I got basic WAS, with an endorsement for 40 and 20 meters, so far. RTTY WAS, with a RTTY endorsement for 2
/archives//html/RTTY/2008-01/msg00183.html (8,184 bytes)

2. Re: [RTTY] Any ND or ME using LoTW? (score: 1)
Author: John Elsik <wa5zup@msn.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 14:33:36 -0700
I wish SSB ops used LOTW like RTTY guys do. 73, John wa5zup really like> to get my RTTY WAS completely via LoTW.> > So.. if you're in Maine or North Dakota and use LoTW and want to give> me a RTTY QS
/archives//html/RTTY/2008-01/msg00185.html (9,576 bytes)

3. Re: [RTTY] Mexico Intl results? (score: 1)
Author: "wa5zup" <wa5zup@msn.com>
Date: Sat, 2 Feb 2008 07:11:32 -0700
Well that stinks! I was going to make a few contacts today, because I am bored. I will be using writelog. To enter do you send them a summary sheet and a ASCII file? John Wa5zup I've not found any of
/archives//html/RTTY/2008-02/msg00008.html (8,994 bytes)

4. Re: [RTTY] MFJ Antenna Switches (score: 1)
Author: "John Elsik" <wa5zup@msn.com>
Date: Sun, 16 Mar 2008 09:03:58 -0600
Heat = loss Heat = underrated for the power/class of service We used several of them at WA7EGA. They would get a little warm but they never failed. 73 Jim W7RY Would like to thank the 9 people who re
/archives//html/RTTY/2008-03/msg00145.html (9,164 bytes)

5. Re: [RTTY] MFJ Antenna Switches (score: 1)
Author: "John Elsik" <wa5zup@msn.com>
Date: Sun, 16 Mar 2008 09:46:13 -0600
Of course there is some "heat" from the relay coil. It depends on "what" is getting warm. The MFJ switches are clearly not rated for 1500W Rtty. The published specs speak for themselves(2kw pep/1kw c
/archives//html/RTTY/2008-03/msg00148.html (9,068 bytes)

6. [RTTY] JARTS (score: 1)
Author: "wa5zup" <wa5zup@msn.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2008 17:20:08 -0600
When I click on the rules link for the JARTS contest it translates to invalid URL. Anybody know where the rules are on the web or where to send in a log? I operated some in this contest last year, ma
/archives//html/RTTY/2008-10/msg00130.html (6,889 bytes)

7. [RTTY] WAE QTC Rule (score: 1)
Author: "wa5zup" <wa5zup@msn.com>
Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2008 05:40:26 -0700
I never operated this contest before. I have been working on setting up Writelog for this. Reading the help files in Writelog and other places, it appears at one time, that QTC exchanges was allowed
/archives//html/RTTY/2008-11/msg00019.html (6,525 bytes)

8. Re: [RTTY] WAE QTC Rule (score: 1)
Author: John Elsik <wa5zup@msn.com>
Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2008 11:03:01 -0700
This is from the help files in Writelog. Which is why I asked the question. The WAE contest appears in the Contest Select menu in two separate places: WAE RTTY and WAE Phone/CW. The RTTY contest rule
/archives//html/RTTY/2008-11/msg00026.html (8,911 bytes)

9. Re: [RTTY] ARRL Roundup RTTY (score: 1)
Author: John Elsik <wa5zup@msn.com>
Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2009 13:19:29 -0700
Reporting: 6.1. All entries are must be postmarked or emailed by 2359 UTC Monday, February 2, 2009 Sorry for the news John wa5zup _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RT
/archives//html/RTTY/2009-02/msg00028.html (7,991 bytes)

10. Re: [RTTY] macros (score: 1)
Author: "wa5zup" <wa5zup@msn.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 05:41:36 -0700
I will chime in on this one. Please do not do that. I struggled with more than one station doing that. That said, the exchanges seem to be getting better (shorter), for the most part. 73 John wa5zup
/archives//html/RTTY/2009-02/msg00262.html (8,782 bytes)

11. Re: [RTTY] NAQP RTTY Frequencies (score: 1)
Author: "wa5zup" <wa5zup@msn.com>
Date: Thu, 5 Mar 2009 16:43:30 -0700
Then put it in the rules and be done with it. It needs to be spelled out so everyone knows what is expected. Not everyone that enters the contest is on this reflector. John wa5zup --Original Message-
/archives//html/RTTY/2009-03/msg00146.html (9,341 bytes)

12. [RTTY] ANARTS contest rest periods (score: 1)
Author: "wa5zup" <wa5zup@msn.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2009 16:31:42 -0600
What is the minimum off time in the ANARTS contest? I did not see that anywhere in the rules. John wa5zup _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http://
/archives//html/RTTY/2009-06/msg00033.html (6,312 bytes)

13. Re: [RTTY] RESULTS: Icom IC-756 PRO III vs. IC-7600 on RTTY (score: 1)
Author: John Elsik <wa5zup@msn.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2009 07:04:51 -0600
Hi Don Something to add: The DSP is better/more powerful in the later Icom versions 7600 & 7700. Overall I think the 7600 is a step up, not back, over the proIII. Now that the question of the TPF has
/archives//html/RTTY/2009-08/msg00019.html (12,902 bytes)

14. Re: [RTTY] Zone sent as Letters (score: 1)
Author: "wa5zup" <wa5zup@msn.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 05:45:12 -0600
Exactly! In this contest the exchange is pretty simple. The logging software auto fills the zone by call area. So if the US station is in the same zone as his call then only the state is important. I
/archives//html/RTTY/2009-09/msg00159.html (7,635 bytes)

15. Re: [RTTY] What causes RTTY with longish character spacing? (score: 1)
Author: John Elsik <wa5zup@msn.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 15:23:25 -0600
I also use a microHam interface and do not have that problem. The only thing I can think of with a microham interface doing that is with the strict bps box checked. For me if it sent RTTY that slow I
/archives//html/RTTY/2009-09/msg00183.html (10,160 bytes)

16. Re: [RTTY] What causes RTTY with longish character spacing? (score: 1)
Author: "wa5zup" <wa5zup@msn.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 17:43:27 -0600
I use Writelog/MMTTY. Why would you not use the limiting speed setting then? I have tried the Strict BPS setting and it was distinctly slower. Real similar to what I have heard on the air. That simpl
/archives//html/RTTY/2009-09/msg00192.html (12,203 bytes)

17. Re: [RTTY] What causes RTTY with longish character spacing? (score: 1)
Author: "wa5zup" <wa5zup@msn.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 18:44:37 -0600
I use FSK with no issues with limiting speed setting. I was talking about running When the conditions right, there is one station after another, that only lasts so long. If you do not make the best u
/archives//html/RTTY/2009-09/msg00201.html (15,129 bytes)

18. Re: [RTTY] RTTY Roundup K5DU Single Op HP (score: 1)
Author: John Elsik <wa5zup@msn.com>
Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2010 10:18:05 -0700
Did you make a typo mistake somewhere? 1759 X (59+10)69 = 121371 _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtt
/archives//html/RTTY/2010-01/msg00019.html (9,012 bytes)

19. Re: [RTTY] RTTY Roundup K5DU Single Op HP (score: 1)
Author: John Elsik <wa5zup@msn.com>
Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2010 10:23:22 -0700
Thats much better! Good score! 73 John wa5zup _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
/archives//html/RTTY/2010-01/msg00021.html (10,836 bytes)

20. Re: [RTTY] Craziest Round-Up Exchange? (score: 1)
Author: "wa5zup" <wa5zup@msn.com>
Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2010 12:15:52 -0700
I can not top that one, at least not this time. I do remember this one: WA5ZUP 599 599 599 DE DE W3xxx MD TNX.... Was the state DE or MD? I guessed MD I had a sneaky Cuba station try to take my frequ
/archives//html/RTTY/2010-01/msg00029.html (8,617 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2]
This search system is powered by Namazu