Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:w8wej@citynet.net: 115 ]

Total 115 documents matching your query.

101. Re: [RTTY] 80M DIGITAL SUB-BAND in JA (score: 1)
Author: john <w8wej@citynet.net>
Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2014 22:39:09 +0000
I think that would be the safe and best way--think we need to petition FCC to expand rtty to 3620 would be a great help, for all contests , i would think 73 john w8wej On 10/17/2014 19:53, Ed Muns wr
/archives//html/RTTY/2014-10/msg00137.html (9,317 bytes)

102. Re: [RTTY] OT Computer Assistance (score: 1)
Author: john <w8wej@citynet.net>
Date: Sun, 23 Nov 2014 21:33:13 +0000
some folk would complain about a sunny day--nuff said,, imo no need to apologize john w8wej On 11/23/2014 13:05, Phil Sussman wrote: Thanks to everyone for their comments and suggestions in my quest
/archives//html/RTTY/2014-11/msg00065.html (10,215 bytes)

103. Re: [RTTY] TS 450 configuration (score: 1)
Author: john <w8wej@citynet.net>
Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2015 19:25:33 -0300
73 Seba Seba Years ago I used AFSK with my 450S but through the mic connector afterall it is audio. Later I went to FSK which the 450 does very well and the advantage is that your dial matches the DX
/archives//html/RTTY/2015-01/msg00173.html (9,088 bytes)

104. Re: [RTTY] ARRL BOD minutes published (score: 1)
Author: john <w8wej@citynet.net>
Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2015 22:18:42 +0000
great, if it is not a condescending move,,, "OK you told us, set down and shut up" type of thing...there is a lack of trust felt on my part here,,, then again I went through incentive licensing where
/archives//html/RTTY/2015-01/msg00214.html (10,040 bytes)

105. Re: [RTTY] K1N vs ARRL (score: 1)
Author: john <w8wej@citynet.net>
Date: Sat, 07 Feb 2015 20:09:51 +0000
what??? On 2/7/2015 7:34 PM, Paul Stoetzer wrote: The ARRL lawyers' position is that, if they are paying the control operator, they cannot deviate from the schedule unless the schedule deviation is a
/archives//html/RTTY/2015-02/msg00012.html (9,665 bytes)

106. Re: [RTTY] K9MUG (score: 1)
Author: john <w8wej@citynet.net>
Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2015 21:46:13 +0000
At the time, not sure how it will be used. Our club is considering using it in the NAQP with the name Ed. Just wanted to update everyone so if you see the callsign, it is legitimate. 73, Cheryl, AA4Y
/archives//html/RTTY/2015-02/msg00150.html (6,937 bytes)

107. Re: [RTTY] E30FB rtty? (score: 1)
Author: john <w8wej@citynet.net>
Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2015 22:22:20 +0000
dream on Alice!! good luck, thanks for all the efforts ,, i have not bothered,,life is way too short gl 73 dx is john w8wej Thanks to all who forwarded information to various unidentified pilots and
/archives//html/RTTY/2015-03/msg00034.html (9,496 bytes)

108. Re: [RTTY] RTTY Contesting Survey (score: 1)
Author: john <w8wej@citynet.net>
Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2015 21:53:19 +0000
we try, Heaven knows, we try, it is nice to have recognition, however dx w8wej Ed W0YK --Original Message-- From: Ed Muns [mailto:ed@w0yk.com] Sent: 28 April, 2015 13:41 To: 'rtty@contesting.com'; 'c
/archives//html/RTTY/2015-04/msg00202.html (9,221 bytes)

109. Re: [RTTY] DXpedition to DE was DE on RTTY Was: NEQP RTTY (score: 1)
Author: john <w8wej@citynet.net>
Date: Sat, 02 May 2015 00:28:09 +0000
w8uv (in DE) will be there,,, I emailed him this link and hopefully every one can hook up gl 73 john On 5/2/2015 12:17 AM, steve wrote: I have heard "someone" say they were going to be on the DE QSO
/archives//html/RTTY/2015-05/msg00005.html (10,900 bytes)

110. Re: [RTTY] Delaware RTTY suggestion - NAQP! (score: 1)
Author: john <w8wej@citynet.net>
Date: Sat, 02 May 2015 22:25:10 +0000
w8uv is now in DE,, he is on lotw and I am sure willing to sched and be available--he is not on this reflector-- yet... for fill ins-new state, he would be a good shot--great guy...just let him know,
/archives//html/RTTY/2015-05/msg00013.html (7,771 bytes)

111. Re: [RTTY] North American QSO Party, RTTY (score: 1)
Author: john <w8wej@citynet.net>
Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2015 16:40:05 +0000
Tom, they went through all of this last year on the rtty reflector--some one contacted the powers to be and they said that "would check in to it"-- heard nothing since...until after the test and the
/archives//html/RTTY/2015-07/msg00018.html (8,599 bytes)

112. Re: [RTTY] ARRL Board Meeting - Approved modified HF band plan changes (score: 1)
Author: john <w8wej@citynet.net>
Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2015 21:54:54 +0000
power and greed--then and now john w8wej Perhaps that's one of the reasons someone (formerly?) at the FCC speculated on eventually only having one license class. REPLY: I'm one of the old f**s who st
/archives//html/RTTY/2015-07/msg00084.html (10,029 bytes)

113. Re: [RTTY] ARRL RoundUp- which N1MM Logger contest file? (score: 1)
Author: john <w8wej@citynet.net>
Date: Sat, 2 Jan 2016 01:31:26 +0000
sure hope that it is,,,what I clicked HNY and gud luck 73 john w8wej On 1/2/2016 12:42 AM, RLVZ-- via RTTY wrote: HNY! I should know this, but I seem to forget things about as fast as I learn them! B
/archives//html/RTTY/2016-01/msg00004.html (7,561 bytes)

114. Re: [RTTY] Converting WPX points to dollars? (score: 1)
Author: john <w8wej@citynet.net>
Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2016 02:08:10 +0000
how many S & H green stamps do you have?? 73 john w8wej Jerry W4UK _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/r
/archives//html/RTTY/2016-02/msg00112.html (7,752 bytes)

115. Re: [RTTY] CQ WPX RTTY from NR4M (score: 1)
Author: john <w8wej@citynet.net>
Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2016 03:14:26 +0000
it is a hobby,,, I am of limited means,,,however , I am blessed with what I have,,, nothing compared to what Steve has , but Ill do with what I do have and be very grateful dx is 73 and enjoy the hob
/archives//html/RTTY/2016-02/msg00115.html (8,327 bytes)

Current List: 101 - 115
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6]
This search system is powered by Namazu