Mail Archive Search: <+from:w7why@frontier.com>

Results:

References: [ +from:w7why@frontier.com: 247 ]

Total 247 documents matching your query.

41. Re: [RTTY] RTTY Sprint (score: 1): Author: "Tom Osborne" <w7why@frontier.com>; Date: Sat, 12 Mar 2011 11:36:41 -0800; Yeah, or worse 'RRR your frequency'. Most guys know when it is their frequency :-) 73 Tom W7WHY _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http://lists.con; /archives//html/RTTY/2011-03/msg00106.html (7,448 bytes)
42. Re: [RTTY] RTTY WAS (score: 1): Author: "Tom Osborne" <w7why@frontier.com>; Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2011 08:59:41 -0700; Congrats Tom!! I'm sitting on 96 on LOTW for my RTTY DXCC. Maybe BARTG this weekend can put me over the top. 73 Tom W7WHY _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contes; /archives//html/RTTY/2011-03/msg00125.html (6,942 bytes)
43. Re: [RTTY] RTTY WAS (score: 1): Author: "Tom Osborne" <w7why@frontier.com>; Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2011 11:33:32 -0700; Mine is number #517 RTTY and I got on 21-Jun-2007, so about 400 in 4 years. I wonder how many people got DXCC in the last 4 years :-) 73 Tom W7WHY _______________________________________________ RTTY; /archives//html/RTTY/2011-03/msg00134.html (8,691 bytes)
44. Re: [RTTY] RigBlaster Pro and FT-1000MP (score: 1): Author: "Tom Osborne" <w7why@frontier.com>; Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2011 17:08:05 -0700; Hi Ron Can you use the narrow filters in AFSK on your rig? A lot of rigs, (like my TS-450) have to use the narrow filters for FSK in the CW mode. They don't work in AFSK. As long as you can use your; /archives//html/RTTY/2011-03/msg00192.html (8,142 bytes)
45. Re: [RTTY] NCJ RTTY Article by AA5AU (score: 1): Author: "Tom Osborne" <w7why@frontier.com>; Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2011 09:42:40 -0700; Hi Jim I'd ask that any replies be posted to the reflector as I (and probably others) would also be interested in this. 73 Tom W7WHY Just finished reading the very good article by AA5AU on RTTY SO2R.; /archives//html/RTTY/2011-03/msg00207.html (7,543 bytes)
46. Re: [RTTY] Fwd: RST in contests (score: 1): Author: "Tom Osborne" <w7why@frontier.com>; Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2011 10:14:37 -0700; I kind of like it What I don't like are the exchanges that come back as '*&6ertu bk'. I noticed that some op's didn't have a space in front of the exchange, or my call, or their call, or anything. Al; /archives//html/RTTY/2011-03/msg00264.html (8,052 bytes)
47. Re: [RTTY] Length-of-Exchange utility (score: 1): Author: "Tom Osborne" <w7why@frontier.com>; Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2011 18:48:18 -0700; Hi Bob Here I do this: CQ test W7WHY CQ W7WHY de W7XXX TU W7WHY CQ That really cuts down on the transmit time. Makes it a lot easier on the old SB-200 tubes!! 73 Tom W7WHY Right on the money, Bill! B; /archives//html/RTTY/2011-03/msg00375.html (10,576 bytes)
48. Re: [RTTY] Site for RTTY WAS list? (score: 1): Author: "Tom Osborne" <w7why@frontier.com>; Date: Fri, 8 Apr 2011 18:46:36 -0700; Hi Dave Don't think so. I got number 517, all LOTW :-) 73 Tom W7WHY _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/; /archives//html/RTTY/2011-04/msg00072.html (8,207 bytes)
49. Re: [RTTY] Re The 10-Meter RTTY Contest (score: 1): Author: "Tom Osborne" <w7why@frontier.com>; Date: Fri, 27 May 2011 09:05:40 -0700; How would you score the RTTY contacts? Are they more difficult than SSB? Are they less difficult than CW? Score them in between?73 Tom W7WHY i have to agree with Chen. i would like to see just a 10 m; /archives//html/RTTY/2011-05/msg00135.html (9,492 bytes)
50. Re: [RTTY] Field Day? (score: 1): Author: "Tom Osborne" <w7why@frontier.com>; Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2011 12:28:07 -0700; Look for K7CCH (Coos County Radio Club) from Oregon on RTTY. Probably no PSK, though. 73 Tom W7WHY Our group will be running some PSK and RTTY for Field Day. Anyone else on here trying some RTTY? We; /archives//html/RTTY/2011-06/msg00149.html (6,964 bytes)
51. Re: [RTTY] T6TL (score: 1): Author: "Tom Osborne" <w7why@frontier.com>; Date: Thu, 7 Jul 2011 15:53:41 -0700; Hi Jim You can also look here for the LOTW standings. http://www.k4fo.com/cqrtty/index.php 73 Tom W7WHY I'm very jealous of Bill's RTTY numbers and congratulate him. The DXCC standings, including RTT; /archives//html/RTTY/2011-07/msg00029.html (7,438 bytes)
52. Re: [RTTY] microHAM & Kenwood TS-450s (score: 1): Author: "Tom Osborne" <w7why@frontier.com>; Date: Sat, 9 Jul 2011 08:03:55 -0700; Hi David Hold down the 'm.in' key while turning on the radio. Check menu number 38. It should be set to 'off' for normal FSK. Are you using the ACC 2 jack on the back of the '450 for FSK? You can't d; /archives//html/RTTY/2011-07/msg00033.html (8,227 bytes)
53. Re: [RTTY] microHAM & Kenwood TS-450s (score: 1): Author: "Tom Osborne" <w7why@frontier.com>; Date: Sat, 9 Jul 2011 11:04:50 -0700; Hi Joe You are true that it looks like it should be on, but it loses something in the translation :-) I use my TS-450 all the time here in FSK and it's set to 'off'. Default is on. 73 Tom W7WHY If th; /archives//html/RTTY/2011-07/msg00039.html (8,887 bytes)
54. Re: [RTTY] Self spotting question (score: 1): Author: "Tom Osborne" <w7why@frontier.com>; Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2011 08:26:08 -0700; AFSK is probably OK for the newer radios, but for the older ones like my old TS-450SAT's, I need FSK so I can use the CW filters. Otherwise I'm running RTTY in the 2400 cycle bandwidth. 73 Tom W7WHY; /archives//html/RTTY/2011-07/msg00065.html (8,782 bytes)
55. Re: [RTTY] Self spotting outside of a contest? (score: 1): Author: "Tom Osborne" <w7why@frontier.com>; Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2011 09:03:22 -0700; Hi Bill I see guys posting her on the reflector when looking for Q's outside of a 'test. I think that might be better than spotting on the cluster. Probably more guys (and gals) see this reflector th; /archives//html/RTTY/2011-07/msg00079.html (8,192 bytes)
56. Re: [RTTY] JT65 on six meters (score: 1): Author: "Tom Osborne" <w7why@frontier.com>; Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2011 21:11:13 -0700; Is that for EME or terrestial, or both? 73 Tom W7WHY Hi Bill, I think the normal frequency for JT65 is 50.276. 73,David _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesti; /archives//html/RTTY/2011-07/msg00101.html (7,178 bytes)
57. Re: [RTTY] JT65 on six meters (score: 1): Author: "Tom Osborne" <w7why@frontier.com>; Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2011 08:42:41 -0700; Hi David Thanks for the info. I just ordered a new power supply for my FT-450 yesterday so hopefully I can get on 6 digital and see what's going on. 73 Tom W7WHY Tom, I believe that most eme is done; /archives//html/RTTY/2011-07/msg00108.html (7,594 bytes)
58. Re: [RTTY] so2r controller choice (score: 1): Author: "Tom Osborne" <w7why@frontier.com>; Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2011 09:06:12 -0700; Hi Jeff It would depend on what kind of computer you are using. Does the computer have a LPT port and serial ports? If so, a DXD works great. That is what I use with the old Dell. With the DXD, you h; /archives//html/RTTY/2011-07/msg00116.html (8,378 bytes)
59. [RTTY] 6 is open (score: 1): Author: "Tom Osborne" <w7why@frontier.com>; Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2011 20:00:45 -0700; HI All Six is now open (0300) to the west coast (CN73). Just worked ND and some other stations on CW. Unfortunately, I just got this rig set up today and don't have the digital cable made yet for RTT; /archives//html/RTTY/2011-07/msg00125.html (6,464 bytes)
60. Re: [RTTY] Potential issue with latest N1MM V11.7.2 release (score: 1): Author: "Tom Osborne" <w7why@frontier.com>; Date: Sat, 16 Jul 2011 09:03:36 -0700; Hi David I trtied LogThenPop here with 11.7.2 and it worked as it should. I was noticing in your macro file, for F-4 you have it set up to log the call, send TU Now...but the F5 macro turns on the tr; /archives//html/RTTY/2011-07/msg00132.html (8,755 bytes)

Current List: 41 - 60
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13]