Mail Archive Search: <+from:w7why@frontier.com>

Results:

References: [ +from:w7why@frontier.com: 247 ]

Total 247 documents matching your query.

201. [RTTY] Multiple cables on 1 core (score: 1): Author: Tom Osborne <w7why@frontier.com>; Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2014 15:55:10 -0700; HI all I'm re-doing some RTTY interfacing here in the shack and just wonder - can you use the same ferrite core for 2 different cables wound together? Sure would make for a neater lashup. Thanks and; /archives//html/RTTY/2014-09/msg00142.html (6,408 bytes)
202. [RTTY] test (score: 1): Author: Tom Osborne <w7why@frontier.com>; Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2014 17:25:28 -0700; Is this still going? Haven't gotten any emails from here for a while. I posted 2 and haven't seen them come up. 73 Tom W7WHY _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@con; /archives//html/RTTY/2014-09/msg00143.html (6,150 bytes)
203. Re: [RTTY] test (score: 1): Author: Tom Osborne <w7why@frontier.com>; Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2014 19:08:28 -0700; Wow - that's weird Gary - Didn't think I was a spammer :-) Thanks and 73 Tom W7WHY 73, Gary AL9A _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http://lists.con; /archives//html/RTTY/2014-09/msg00147.html (6,944 bytes)
204. Re: [RTTY] Alert: ARRL Servers HACKED, need to change password (score: 1): Author: Tom Osborne <w7why@frontier.com>; Date: Wed, 08 Oct 2014 09:22:16 -0700; They say people won't be interested in what goes on on this site, because all they can do is see your DXCC info or read QST online. But - how many people use the same password for many different site; /archives//html/RTTY/2014-10/msg00089.html (7,421 bytes)
205. Re: [RTTY] OT Computer Assistance (score: 1): Author: Tom Osborne <w7why@frontier.com>; Date: Sun, 23 Nov 2014 14:34:12 -0800; Or more :-) 73 Tom W7WHY REPLY: Not to worry, Phil. All of us RTTY'ers use computers and getting them to work is as much a part of the hobby as getting radios to work. 73, Bill W6WRT ________________; /archives//html/RTTY/2014-11/msg00066.html (8,937 bytes)
206. Re: [RTTY] W1AW/4 RTTY on 3606.6 QSX UP!! (score: 1): Author: Tom Osborne <w7why@frontier.com>; Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2014 19:29:51 -0800; Not only bad operating, but illegal for the U.S. to operate above 3600. Can't believe the callers don't know that! 73 Tom w7WHY Hiram wouldn't be happy. Where's the Wouff Hong? 73, Jim N7US _________; /archives//html/RTTY/2014-12/msg00059.html (7,628 bytes)
207. [RTTY] RU macros (score: 1): Author: Tom Osborne <w7why@frontier.com>; Date: Sat, 03 Jan 2015 19:24:04 -0800; If anyone is reading this and in the RTTY Roundup, check your macros. Please don't put a {enter} or {cr} at the end of you exchange or callsign macros. When you do that, just about the time someone g; /archives//html/RTTY/2015-01/msg00031.html (6,671 bytes)
208. Re: [RTTY] Lids running RTTY on the JT65 Frequency (score: 1): Author: Tom Osborne <w7why@frontier.com>; Date: Mon, 05 Jan 2015 16:43:50 -0800; In the next RTTY contest, 14.090 is going to be 'MY' frequency. I don't want anyone trespassing there as I am now laying claim. If you happen to tune there and don't hear anything, it is because I am; /archives//html/RTTY/2015-01/msg00081.html (11,203 bytes)
209. Re: [RTTY] TS 450 configuration (score: 1): Author: Tom Osborne <w7why@frontier.com>; Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2015 14:08:33 -0800; Yes - you definitely want to do FSK with the TS-450. You can use the narrow filters that way. In AFSK you are stuck with the SSB filters.73 Tom W7WHY 73 Seba Seba Years ago I used AFSK with my 450S b; /archives//html/RTTY/2015-01/msg00172.html (8,507 bytes)
210. Re: [RTTY] K1N vs ARRL (score: 1): Author: Tom Osborne <w7why@frontier.com>; Date: Sat, 07 Feb 2015 20:14:47 -0800; Does anybody even listen to the bulletins on CW any more? 73 Tom W7WHY On 2/7/2015 3:10 PM, Ron Kolarik wrote: Pete, while the ARRL bulletins are a special case the problem could easily be solved by; /archives//html/RTTY/2015-02/msg00017.html (8,399 bytes)
211. Re: [RTTY] WHY put CQ at the end? (score: 1): Author: Tom Osborne <w7why@frontier.com>; Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2015 10:38:06 -0800; Hi Larry What happens when you call CQ like that and someone tunes onto you, all they see is W6NWS. . Then they have to wait to see if you are calling CQ or calling someone else. A CQ on the end mean; /archives//html/RTTY/2015-02/msg00095.html (8,856 bytes)
212. Re: [RTTY] WHY put CQ at the end? (score: 1): Author: Tom Osborne <w7why@frontier.com>; Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2015 10:43:44 -0800; I have also printed stations who send 'cq cq w1xyz w1xyz', or 'na na w1xyz'. Instead of sending CQ or NA twice at the start, why not send it once at the start and once at the end. 73 Tom W7WHY So, le; /archives//html/RTTY/2015-02/msg00099.html (9,753 bytes)
213. Re: [RTTY] WHY put CQ at the end? (score: 1): Author: Tom Osborne <w7why@frontier.com>; Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2015 09:32:42 -0800; With all the talk of Skimmers, Who's on First, etc, all I want is to see is a CQ on the end so I can tell when I tune on a station if they are calling CQ or not. 73 Tom W7WHY ________________________; /archives//html/RTTY/2015-02/msg00120.html (8,602 bytes)
214. Re: [RTTY] QRP RTTY Contest (score: 1): Author: Tom Osborne <w7why@frontier.com>; Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2015 09:33:56 -0800; Cheryl - if you just put a link in your post with no explanation, probably nobody will open it. That is the way spam comes into a computer, through bogus links. I know I'd never open one. 73 Tom W7WH; /archives//html/RTTY/2015-02/msg00130.html (7,165 bytes)
215. Re: [RTTY] QRP RTTY Contest (score: 1): Author: Tom Osborne <w7why@frontier.com>; Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2015 09:47:12 -0800; I still ain't gonna open an email with nothing except a link in it!! Cheryl - if you just put a link in your post with no explanation, probably nobody will open it. That is the way spam comes into a; /archives//html/RTTY/2015-02/msg00131.html (7,730 bytes)
216. Re: [RTTY] Question about NAQP rules (score: 1): Author: Tom Osborne <w7why@frontier.com>; Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2015 10:06:01 -0800; Bill - I have wondered this same thing my self. I have a couple of amps and one of them is an old SB-200 which now on a good day will put out about 350 watts. What is the difference between throttlin; /archives//html/RTTY/2015-02/msg00157.html (9,624 bytes)
217. Re: [RTTY] Question about NAQP rules (score: 1): Author: Tom Osborne <w7why@frontier.com>; Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2015 11:11:04 -0800; Hi Ric I would say that they not cheating if using a high power rig at 100 watts. Same way for amps - they are not cheating if they have one and throttle it back. If someone wants to game the system,; /archives//html/RTTY/2015-02/msg00161.html (9,358 bytes)
218. Re: [RTTY] Question about NAQP rules (score: 1): Author: Tom Osborne <w7why@frontier.com>; Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2015 19:16:22 -0800; FT-102 does about 175 watts with 3 6146's in the final. 73 Tom W7WHY Are there older transceivers (exciter alone) capable of more than 100 w output (no "external amplifier") for RTTY. That okay? <smi; /archives//html/RTTY/2015-02/msg00166.html (9,017 bytes)
219. Re: [RTTY] Question about NAQP rules (score: 1): Author: Tom Osborne <w7why@frontier.com>; Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2015 10:23:44 -0800; Now that is the silliest thing I have ever heard. Why would we run more that 100 watts - cause we're cheaters? Why italicize 'you'? Are you singling out Biil?? 73 Tom W7WHY IF "you" used the KW amp,; /archives//html/RTTY/2015-02/msg00182.html (9,540 bytes)
220. Re: [RTTY] Question about NAQP rules (score: 1): Author: Tom Osborne <w7why@frontier.com>; Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2015 13:55:26 -0800; And - to really get nitpicky - the KPA100, according to a report I saw, runs 105 watts on 80 and 110 watts on 10. Does that make it illegal? Or, do we just say 'if the amp runs just a little over 100; /archives//html/RTTY/2015-02/msg00187.html (9,820 bytes)

Current List: 201 - 220
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13]