Mail Archive Search: <+from:w7why@frontier.com>

Results:

References: [ +from:w7why@frontier.com: 247 ]

Total 247 documents matching your query.

101. [RTTY] NAQP Practice (score: 1): Author: "Tom Osborne" <w7why@frontier.com>; Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2012 09:07:54 -0800; This is just a reminder of the NAQP RTTY practice session that K6UFO announced earlier this week. The purpose is to test our RTTY interfaces and software before NAQP RTTY this weekend. Friday, 24 Feb; /archives//html/RTTY/2012-02/msg00306.html (6,703 bytes)
102. Re: [RTTY] What does it take to finish in the top 10? (score: 1): Author: "Tom Osborne" <w7why@frontier.com>; Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2012 15:49:32 -0800; One of these days, in the not-too-distant future, someone is going to come up with a RTTY Skimmer, and the whole ballgame will change once again, at least in the assisted category. Dave Hachadorian,; /archives//html/RTTY/2012-02/msg00353.html (9,550 bytes)
103. Re: [RTTY] Old computer? (score: 1): Author: "Tom Osborne" <w7why@frontier.com>; Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2012 12:51:37 -0700; Hi Nick Do you still have the DOS disks? You could probably just format the hard drive and reload DOS and start all over again if you have all the HAL drivers, etc. 73 Tom W7WHY ____________________; /archives//html/RTTY/2012-03/msg00025.html (7,454 bytes)
104. Re: [RTTY] Funny you should mention..... (score: 1): Author: "Tom Osborne" <w7why@frontier.com>; Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2012 08:05:03 -0700; Yeah, that was a pain. Especially when you had to use different FSK components for different bands due to frequency doubling in the VFO, etc. Lots easier now :-) 73 Tom W7WHY Indeed. My first RTTY wa; /archives//html/RTTY/2012-03/msg00191.html (8,285 bytes)
105. Re: [RTTY] Fw: ARLB006 NTIA: No Objection to Additional Data Modeson60 Meters (score: 1): Author: "Tom Osborne" <w7why@frontier.com>; Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2012 12:32:20 -0700; Naw, just used Ajax here :-) If I went too far, a pencil mark will bring it back. 73 Tom W7WHY Remember hydrofluoric acid? Anything that will dissolve quartz is not to be messed with, I assure you. Y; /archives//html/RTTY/2012-03/msg00202.html (11,396 bytes)
106. Re: [RTTY] Fw: ARLB006 NTIA: No Objection to Additional Data Modes on60 Meters [now another FSK/AFSK thread] (score: 1): Author: "Tom Osborne" <w7why@frontier.com>; Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2012 12:39:47 -0700; I don't think so, but where would you disagree with his analysis? Chen makes a lot of sense to me. Good results can be had with really crappy signals, whether it be on SSB or RTTY. I've seen some big; /archives//html/RTTY/2012-03/msg00204.html (11,406 bytes)
107. Re: [RTTY] Funny you should mention..... (score: 1): Author: "Tom Osborne" <w7why@frontier.com>; Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2012 13:58:46 -0700; Hey, started out with a Model 14 strip printer here. Used a 555 op-amp tu. Moved up to a Model 15 with a DT-600 (ST-6 and AFSK generator on 1 board) and never looked back. Also had a Drake for the fi; /archives//html/RTTY/2012-03/msg00208.html (9,205 bytes)
108. Re: [RTTY] RadioShack isolation transformer replacement (score: 1): Author: "Tom Osborne" <w7why@frontier.com>; Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2012 13:35:42 -0700; Hi Chen I was told, I think by K9YC, to do that some time back. I run the audio wide open on the windows setup and crank the audio and carrier back on the TS-450SAT until it just barely flickers the; /archives//html/RTTY/2012-04/msg00029.html (10,466 bytes)
109. Re: [RTTY] FSKit again (score: 1): Author: "Tom Osborne" <w7why@frontier.com>; Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2012 12:07:56 -0700; There was an article in one of the ham mags. I think it was NCJ. Here's some info on it: http://keriza.com/page1/page5/page5.html 73 Tom W7WHY Hi guys: I received my May QST today and was intrigued b; /archives//html/RTTY/2012-04/msg00077.html (7,304 bytes)
110. Re: [RTTY] Tip for Thursday Night NS RTTY (score: 1): Author: "Tom Osborne" <w7why@frontier.com>; Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2012 21:57:22 -0700; You know, I don't think many adhere to that rule. If so, seems like there would be a lot of people calling CQ above 0.45 and below 0.40. Most stations I work seeme to be crammed between 0.40 and 0.44; /archives//html/RTTY/2012-04/msg00121.html (8,637 bytes)
111. Re: [RTTY] Tip for Thursday Night NS RTTY (score: 1): Author: "Tom Osborne" <w7why@frontier.com>; Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2012 21:59:31 -0700; Oops, got that mixed with CW NS. Sorry about that. But, I think the rules are the same for CW - 5kc. 73 Tom W7WHY You know, I don't think many adhere to that rule. If so, seems like there would be a; /archives//html/RTTY/2012-04/msg00122.html (8,644 bytes)
112. Re: [RTTY] SKED 12m LOTW (score: 1): Author: "Tom Osborne" <w7why@frontier.com>; Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2012 13:08:07 -0700; What time and frequency? I'm hearing signals now at 20:07z Tom W7WHY I am looking for a SKED on 12m with someone that uses LOTW RTTY or any other mode ? Pse send me E-mail from the shack of WB5AAA 73; /archives//html/RTTY/2012-04/msg00135.html (6,709 bytes)
113. Re: [RTTY] Fwd: Re: 7O6T again (score: 1): Author: Tom Osborne <w7why@frontier.com>; Date: Wed, 16 May 2012 10:03:40 -0700; I doubt if the QRM'ers read this reflector, but it they do, I'll bet they are smiling at all the attention they are getting. That is their main objective. The more they get bad mouthed the better the; /archives//html/RTTY/2012-05/msg00235.html (7,832 bytes)
114. Re: [RTTY] RTTY NS - expand to 60 minutes? (score: 1): Author: Tom Osborne <w7why@frontier.com>; Date: Fri, 01 Jun 2012 12:43:13 -0700; If you can get more people to participate. I run out of stations to work after 20 minutes. 73 Tom W7WHY _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http://li; /archives//html/RTTY/2012-06/msg00004.html (7,109 bytes)
115. Re: [RTTY] PSK31 is faster (Was FD RTTY Question) (score: 1): Author: Tom Osborne <w7why@frontier.com>; Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2012 23:05:13 -0700; Hi Chen I had a model 28 here 'back when', but it was only a 60wpm machine (I think it was 45 baud). Some of the 28's actually had a transmission that could shift from 60 to 75 and some 100 wpm. I ca; /archives//html/RTTY/2012-06/msg00129.html (9,537 bytes)
116. Re: [RTTY] PSK31 is faster (Was FD RTTY Question) (score: 1): Author: Tom Osborne <w7why@frontier.com>; Date: Sat, 30 Jun 2012 14:16:20 -0700; HI Andy I think one thing that makes it really slow is that most PSK op's that I've worked just send canned macro's back and forth. You ask a question and you get rig, QSL route, grid square, date an; /archives//html/RTTY/2012-06/msg00145.html (9,347 bytes)
117. [RTTY] JT-65 (score: 1): Author: "Tom Osborne" <w7why@frontier.com>; Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2012 14:04:35 -0700; Can someone working JT-65 contact me off list. I have some questions. 73 Tom W7WHY _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/ma; /archives//html/RTTY/2012-08/msg00025.html (6,721 bytes)
118. [RTTY] JT-65 (score: 1): Author: "Tom Osborne" <w7why@frontier.com>; Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2012 18:08:52 -0700; Thanks for all the emails and fone calls. Got it going. Main thing I needed to do was upgrade from HRD 4 to HRD 5. Made a couple of Q's and all is well in Mudville. 73 and thanks again. What a great; /archives//html/RTTY/2012-08/msg00027.html (6,775 bytes)
119. Re: [RTTY] lost logging ability (score: 1): Author: "Tom Osborne" <w7why@frontier.com>; Date: Sat, 29 Sep 2012 08:25:01 -0700; I downloaded version 12.09.03 last night as my old ver. 9.x.x was acting up. Going along fine until this morning I logged UN1L (my first non State/RAC station) and suddenly the Log It button has gray; /archives//html/RTTY/2012-09/msg00172.html (7,546 bytes)
120. Re: [RTTY] B4 Now - reposting scores (score: 1): Author: "Tom Osborne" <w7why@frontier.com>; Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2012 09:20:36 -0700; HI Shelby I usually don't see more than 3 - 4 poeple who post their scores here. Can't understand why you would see so many that your finget would get 'worn out' from deleting them. 73 Tom W7WHY "ban; /archives//html/RTTY/2012-10/msg00061.html (9,929 bytes)

Current List: 101 - 120
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13]