Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:w2up@mindspring.com: 248 ]

Total 248 documents matching your query.

201. Re: [RTTY] Everyday RTTY Software (score: 1)
Author: Barry <w2up@mindspring.com>
Date: Tue, 03 Jan 2006 00:15:29 +0000
Has anyone run a head to head comparison of MixW and MMTTY? Barry, W2UP -- Barry Kutner, W2UP Newtown, PA _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http://
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-01/msg00037.html (8,101 bytes)

202. Re: [RTTY] Now this is a tad funny about LoTW (score: 1)
Author: Barry <w2up@mindspring.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2006 00:02:53 +0000
At least I have a few K1ZZ cfmd QSOs... Barry, W2UP -- Barry Kutner, W2UP Newtown, PA _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-01/msg00538.html (9,390 bytes)

203. Re: [RTTY] QSL cards (score: 1)
Author: "Barry " <w2up@mindspring.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2006 13:43:37 -0500
I QSL 100% all received buro cards and direct cards with SASE. I don't QSL band-mode dupes. For example, if you have my card for 20 CW and want 20 RTTY, fine. If you want a second 20 CW card, fuggeda
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-01/msg00586.html (8,152 bytes)

204. Re: [RTTY] CW interference! (score: 1)
Author: Barry <w2up@mindspring.com>
Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2006 20:57:30 +0000
I had some nutcase trying to chase me off 14070. He kept sending "PSK window" in CW. I thought it was pretty funny that a mode with a 30 Hz bandwidth needs to protect a "reserved" frequency like the
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-02/msg00260.html (7,722 bytes)

205. Re: [RTTY] source for PHYLLISTRAN (score: 1)
Author: Barry <w2up@mindspring.com>
Date: Sat, 04 Mar 2006 21:58:54 +0000
They will only sell a full spool (5000 ft?) directly. Barry W2UP -- Barry Kutner, W2UP Newtown, PA _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http://lists.c
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-03/msg00084.html (8,587 bytes)

206. Re: [RTTY] yj0adx on rtty 21083 at 2143Z (score: 1)
Author: Barry <w2up@mindspring.com>
Date: Mon, 06 Mar 2006 22:36:01 +0000
Don't you guys connect to the Cluster? It's a much more efficient way of getting real-time spots than email. DX de AB5K: 21083.1 YJ0ADX 2143Z TX DX de W6IHG: 21083.1 YJ0ADX rtty up 2142Z VA DX de K8N
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-03/msg00110.html (9,834 bytes)

207. Re: [RTTY] [Norton AntiSpam] Re: yj0adx on rtty 21083 at 2143Z (score: 1)
Author: Barry <w2up@mindspring.com>
Date: Tue, 07 Mar 2006 12:44:11 +0000
Jerry, I did a "sh/dx/20 yj0adx" (without the quotes) for the last 20 callouts. There are a few different Cluster software packages, so the syntax could be different on your node. 73, Barry -- Barry
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-03/msg00121.html (11,449 bytes)

208. Re: [RTTY] Fwd: Undelivered Mail Returned to Sender (score: 1)
Author: Barry <w2up@mindspring.com>
Date: Tue, 07 Mar 2006 12:44:38 +0000
Yes. -- Barry Kutner, W2UP Newtown, PA _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-03/msg00122.html (9,251 bytes)

209. Re: [RTTY] Dayton RTTY Forum (score: 1)
Author: Barry <w2up@mindspring.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Mar 2006 23:48:10 +0000
Only problem with Sunday is a lot of people are leaving first thing in the morning (myself included). CU guys at the Contest Suite in the Crowne Plaza. 73, Barry W2UP -- Barry Kutner, W2UP Newtown, P
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-03/msg00323.html (9,032 bytes)

210. Re: [RTTY] WAS #429 (score: 1)
Author: Barry <w2up@mindspring.com>
Date: Mon, 03 Apr 2006 23:32:35 +0000
I got #170 in 1991. I recall, at the time, I thought it was a mistake, but I guess not. Barry W2UP -- Barry Kutner, W2UP Newtown, PA _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-04/msg00046.html (8,087 bytes)

211. Re: [RTTY] OLD!!! (score: 1)
Author: Barry <w2up@mindspring.com>
Date: Tue, 09 May 2006 00:03:39 +0000
Speaking of old, I saw someone trying to sell a VIC-20 at a local hamfest over the weekend :.) My first exposure to RTTY was in the early 70s at the QTH of W2IDX, who lived nearby. He had TTY machine
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-05/msg00042.html (9,188 bytes)

212. Re: [RTTY] 250 hz filter on RTTY (score: 1)
Author: Barry <w2up@mindspring.com>
Date: Tue, 23 May 2006 20:08:10 +0000
I guess it depends how steep the skirts are on your filters. I almost never use my 250 Hz filter on RTTY. My FT-1000D has a 500 also, and that's what I mostly use. Enough guys call off frequency nece
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-05/msg00159.html (8,569 bytes)

213. Re: [RTTY] Ham Radio Operators (score: 1)
Author: Barry <w2up@mindspring.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2006 00:14:07 +0000
I've only gotten 5 copies of this spam already. Please block him from the list. Tnx, Barry -- Barry Kutner, W2UP Newtown, PA _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@con
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-07/msg00061.html (7,563 bytes)

214. Re: [RTTY] Not to beat the ANTENNA OVERKILL horse... (score: 1)
Author: Barry <w2up@mindspring.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2006 18:05:16 +0000
Sorry, but there is no way to level the playing field. Even when they try to level it, as in WRTC, some stations are better than others. If you can't win the contest and it bothers you, either don't
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-07/msg00175.html (11,459 bytes)

215. Re: [RTTY] Not to beat the SO2R horse (score: 1)
Author: Barry <w2up@mindspring.com>
Date: Sat, 22 Jul 2006 17:42:36 +0000
Bill, Not necessarily true. When I do RTTY SO2R, more often than not, I alternate CQs on 2 bands. As soon as R1 goes into rcve, R2 starts CQing. I've found it more productive than listening on the se
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-07/msg00248.html (8,957 bytes)

216. [RTTY] Montenegro on RTTY? (score: 1)
Author: Barry <w2up@mindspring.com>
Date: Sat, 22 Jul 2006 17:52:47 +0000
Anyone have any info? 73, Barry -- Barry Kutner, W2UP Newtown, PA _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rt
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-07/msg00250.html (6,321 bytes)

217. Re: [RTTY] Not to beat the SO2R horse (score: 1)
Author: Barry <w2up@mindspring.com>
Date: Sat, 22 Jul 2006 18:09:36 +0000
Bill, When you said one is in rcve, I interpreted that as tuning the band while xmtg on the other radio, when in fact, I'm just copying an exchange or station calling. You win this round :.) 73, Barr
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-07/msg00257.html (10,439 bytes)

218. Re: [RTTY] An open letter to Shelby, K4WW (score: 1)
Author: Barry <w2up@mindspring.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2006 18:28:32 +0000
Comments interspersed below... The reason I'm against the rule change, and I'm sure others agree, is I built my station to be as competitive as can be *within the context of the rules*. Now, that I'v
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-07/msg00382.html (11,091 bytes)

219. [RTTY] correction (score: 1)
Author: Barry <w2up@mindspring.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2006 19:25:10 +0000
CQWW RTTY HP or SOA, but in 1990... " The year was 2000, not 1990. Not sure where that came from. 73, Barry -- Barry Kutner, W2UP Newtown, PA _______________________________________________ RTTY mail
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-07/msg00386.html (6,446 bytes)

220. Re: [RTTY] SO2R vs. SO1R - a pertinent question (score: 1)
Author: Barry <w2up@mindspring.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2006 01:14:29 +0000
Tom, You're missing the point. _Operator skill_ is the significant advantage. It's not easy to be able to use the second radio to one's advantage (granted, it's easier on RTTY, than CW or SSB.) Put a
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-07/msg00404.html (9,522 bytes)

Current List: 201 - 220
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13]
This search system is powered by Namazu