Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:w2up@mindspring.com: 248 ]

Total 248 documents matching your query.

161. [RTTY] Taking a break from RTTY contesting (score: 1)
Author: "Barry " <w2up@mindspring.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Sep 2004 00:59:36 -0000
Hi all, While I haven't been very active on RTTY the last few years, other than operating CQWW and the Sprint, I just thought I'd mention that I won't be on for the CQWW RTTY test this year. Don, it'
/archives//html/RTTY/2004-09/msg00127.html (7,241 bytes)

162. Re: [RTTY] QSO B4 (score: 1)
Author: "Barry " <w2up@mindspring.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 17:46:16 -0000
and Because the friend.ini file doesn't waste enough time? Barry W2UP-- Barry Kutner, W2UP Internet: w2up@mindspring.com Newtown, PA Frankford Radio Club _____________________________________________
/archives//html/RTTY/2004-09/msg00299.html (8,165 bytes)

163. Re: [RTTY] AA0CY Cabrillo Log Is Posted (score: 1)
Author: "Barry " <w2up@mindspring.com>
Date: Mon, 04 Oct 2004 10:49:38 -0000
About 25 years ago I did some contest log checking (pre-computer days). It amazed me when I saw people actually wrote 5NN down for their signal reports. I assumed these were SSB ops that had little e
/archives//html/RTTY/2004-10/msg00053.html (8,760 bytes)

164. Re: [RTTY] WAEDC + QTC's and how to handle them (score: 1)
Author: "Barry " <w2up@mindspring.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2004 13:46:49 -0500
One more comment about QTCs. To my surprise, in the past, quite a few stations have asked for my QTCs on 80m. Unless you are very loud, I generally decline. Why? Because with all the noise on 80m, it
/archives//html/RTTY/2004-11/msg00072.html (15,195 bytes)

165. [RTTY] Bug with QTC in WAE RTTY (score: 1)
Author: "Barry " <w2up@mindspring.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2004 20:38:33 -0000
Besides needing to hit ESC to end xmsn when sending a single QTC, I noticed that if I had to send more than one individual QTC with ALT+number, the radio did not key for the second (or more) QTC. Bar
/archives//html/RTTY/2004-11/msg00118.html (6,515 bytes)

166. Re: [RTTY] ARRL 10 (score: 1)
Author: "Barry " <w2up@mindspring.com>
Date: Thu, 09 Dec 2004 01:54:17 -0000
Microphone? What's a microphone? I often operate the 10m test, but CW only. May get on this weekend if the band opens, but based on recent condx, I doubt it will happen. Barry W2UP -- Barry Kutner, W
/archives//html/RTTY/2004-12/msg00046.html (8,113 bytes)

167. Re: [RTTY] VU4 RTTY (score: 1)
Author: "Barry " <w2up@mindspring.com>
Date: Mon, 20 Dec 2004 02:02:51 -0000
Don't think there's going to be any Baudot RTTY, though they've made some PSK QSOs. Guess the best we can hope for is the VU powers-that-be see that hamming from VU4 is OK and they approve future ope
/archives//html/RTTY/2004-12/msg00174.html (8,224 bytes)

168. Re: [RTTY] VU4NRO on RTTY - soon (score: 1)
Author: "Barry " <w2up@mindspring.com>
Date: Mon, 20 Dec 2004 19:24:51 -0000
I hope we're not taking a list for spoon fedding purposes, are we? I need 6 more on RTTY for them all. VU4 is one of them. That should tell you how many people need it. 73, Barry W2UP -- Barry Kutner
/archives//html/RTTY/2004-12/msg00208.html (10,959 bytes)

169. Re: [RTTY] VU4NRO on RTTY - soon (score: 1)
Author: "Barry " <w2up@mindspring.com>
Date: Mon, 20 Dec 2004 23:27:07 -0000
Steve, Having done PSK in the RTTY Roundup a few times, I agree with you. There were several occsaions when I was ready to push F1 again for another CQ, not hearing anyone come back to me, but when I
/archives//html/RTTY/2004-12/msg00216.html (10,811 bytes)

170. Re: [RTTY] RTTY Callsign Database (score: 1)
Author: "Barry " <w2up@mindspring.com>
Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2005 03:33:34 -0000
Wouldn't know if he was still on or not. Could never hear him anyway 73, Barry-- Barry Kutner, W2UP Internet: w2up@mindspring.com Newtown, PA Frankford Radio Club ____________________________________
/archives//html/RTTY/2005-01/msg00039.html (7,715 bytes)

171. [RTTY] Macquarie (score: 1)
Author: "Barry " <w2up@mindspring.com>
Date: Sun, 09 Jan 2005 23:05:21 -0000
Anyone know anything about this and whether RTTY gear is on hand? 73, Barry W2UP VK0M, MACQUARIE ISLAND. Dave, VK3KR, a Senior Communications Technical Officer, is now active as VK0MT from Macquarie
/archives//html/RTTY/2005-01/msg00102.html (7,949 bytes)

172. Re: [RTTY] PSK Info (score: 1)
Author: "Barry " <w2up@mindspring.com>
Date: Sun, 16 Jan 2005 23:21:25 -0000
Ty, Maybe some of the "clueful" need to set an example on PSK. There's no comparison for weak signal work. PSK blows Baudot out of the water! 73, Barry W2UP -- Barry Kutner, W2UP Internet: w2up@minds
/archives//html/RTTY/2005-01/msg00201.html (8,503 bytes)

173. Re: [RTTY] FSK vs AFSK (score: 1)
Author: "Barry " <w2up@mindspring.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2005 22:01:01 -0000
Are you using optoisolators (such as 4N33)? If so, that's your problem. They tend not to work with the FT-1000D. I use 2N2222 or equiv transistors and they work well with the 1000D. 1K resistor in th
/archives//html/RTTY/2005-02/msg00126.html (8,694 bytes)

174. [RTTY] Tnx WX5L! (score: 1)
Author: "Barry " <w2up@mindspring.com>
Date: Sun, 13 Feb 2005 13:52:26 -0000
I just wanted to publicly thank Randy, WX5L, for the Cluster spot for VK0MT on 40 PSK this morning. When I first saw it, I thought to myself there's no way, because it's already 2 hours past sunrise
/archives//html/RTTY/2005-02/msg00167.html (6,833 bytes)

175. RE: [RTTY] K4GMH SOAB HP (WPX) (score: 1)
Author: "Barry " <w2up@mindspring.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2005 18:18:23 -0000
Don, In your case, it could be a mixup with AA5VU. Funny thing about dupes that have called me (I just work'em again) - I've received QSL cards from some guys for BOTH QSOs - the first one AND the du
/archives//html/RTTY/2005-02/msg00217.html (8,748 bytes)

176. Re: [RTTY] FT5XO on 30m RTTY? One can hope... (score: 1)
Author: "Barry " <w2up@mindspring.com>
Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2005 08:50:06 -0500
Funny how our experiences differ from the same part of the country. I haven't worked them on 30m yet. I thought they had a better signal on 40m, but maybe that's because I don't have any WARC antenna
/archives//html/RTTY/2005-03/msg00153.html (8,582 bytes)

177. [RTTY] FT5XO? (score: 1)
Author: "Barry " <w2up@mindspring.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2005 22:00:20 -0000
This spot appeared on the Cluster this morning: OK2PUI 21081.0 FT5XO rtty start finnaly up 1443 24 Mar 2005 Only one though. I would expect many spots once they start Makes me wonder... Anyone with i
/archives//html/RTTY/2005-03/msg00205.html (6,982 bytes)

178. Re: [RTTY] ft5xo in rtty (score: 1)
Author: "Barry " <w2up@mindspring.com>
Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2005 19:58:18 -0000
This morning, in 3-land, they were S-9+ on 40m LP about an hour after our sunrise. Most days this past week, they had a decent signal on 20m LP an hour or two after sunrise. Today was an exception, b
/archives//html/RTTY/2005-03/msg00214.html (10,117 bytes)

179. [RTTY] FT5XO (score: 1)
Author: "Barry " <w2up@mindspring.com>
Date: Sun, 27 Mar 2005 04:31:27 -0000
Now on 14085 w/decent signal! -- Barry Kutner, W2UP Internet: w2up@mindspring.com Newtown, PA Frankford Radio Club _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.co
/archives//html/RTTY/2005-03/msg00234.html (6,516 bytes)

180. [RTTY] FT5XO on 17m now (score: 1)
Author: "Barry " <w2up@mindspring.com>
Date: Sun, 27 Mar 2005 13:26:57 -0000
They're on 18104 RTTY working EU. Extremely weak in 3-land. BTW, I noticed that MMTTY prints barely audible signals much better using the Fluttered (FIR) profile (don't forget to turn off NET and AFC
/archives//html/RTTY/2005-03/msg00236.html (6,524 bytes)

Current List: 161 - 180
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13]
This search system is powered by Namazu