Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:vsh@udm.net: 27 ]

Total 27 documents matching your query.

21. Re: [RTTY] Great fun BARTG (score: 1)
Author: "VSH[RW4WZ]" <vsh@udm.net>
Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2005 23:47:19 +0400
There is macro <CTIME> - time for contest {HHMM} 73! Larry RW4WZ _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rt
/archives//html/RTTY/2005-03/msg00167.html (7,706 bytes)

22. Re: [RTTY] VE1OP JARTS RTTY (score: 1)
Author: "VSH-RW4WZ" <vsh@udm.net>
Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2005 23:04:19 +0500
I got 589 from one German guy on 10 m and here the extract from rx.log: RST 589 AGE 45 45 45 QSL TU TNX 73! Signal was stable 599, but still do not quite sure that it was correct ;) 73! Larry RW4WZ
/archives//html/RTTY/2005-10/msg00170.html (7,056 bytes)

23. Re: [RTTY] Our turn at a poll (score: 1)
Author: "VSH-RW4WZ" <vsh@udm.net>
Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2005 21:57:56 +0400
73! Larry RW4WZ DXCC RTTY #1497 #9 IN RUSSIA WAZ RTTY #56 _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
/archives//html/RTTY/2005-12/msg00243.html (8,995 bytes)

24. Re: [RTTY] RTTY Best Practices (score: 1)
Author: "VSH-RW4WZ" <vsh@udm.net>
Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2006 13:30:35 +0400
I'm not WriteLog user and really couldn't understand what is the difference with CR/LF readings by WL and other programs ? 73! Larry RW4WZ _______________________________________________ RTTY mailin
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-01/msg00316.html (8,070 bytes)

25. Re: [RTTY] Using RIT (score: 1)
Author: "VSH-RW4WZ" <vsh@udm.net>
Date: Sun, 22 Jan 2006 22:15:51 +0400
There is a more easy way for FT1000MP users, just insert the CAT command "CLAR CLEAR" to Your macros after You save the QSO. 73! Larry RW4WZ _______________________________________________ RTTY mail
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-01/msg00494.html (7,350 bytes)

26. Re: [RTTY] Mono band amps (score: 1)
Author: "VSH-RW4WZ" <vsh@udm.net>
Date: Sun, 22 Jan 2006 22:44:06 +0400
Good idea, but it seems for me it will be cheaper and easy to build PA using one tube and 5 PI networks which is switch by 10 relays...... We build 30 years ago such a kind PA at UK4WAR ;) 73! Larry
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-01/msg00497.html (8,501 bytes)

27. Re: [RTTY] [CQ-Contest] Mono band amps (score: 1)
Author: "VSH-RW4WZ" <vsh@udm.net>
Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2006 01:41:45 +0400
Yes, it is very important, especially for 10 m. First we select Tube with low output capacity. As I remember 25 pf. Then modeling the different constructions methods to minimize the capacity value.
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-01/msg00506.html (8,615 bytes)

Current List: 21 - 27
Page: [1] [2]
This search system is powered by Namazu