Mail Archive Search: <+from:ve3iay@storm.ca>

Results:

References: [ +from:ve3iay@storm.ca: 55 ]

Total 55 documents matching your query.

1. [RTTY] MMTTY receive problems (score: 1): Author: ve3iay@storm.ca (Richard Ferch); Date: Tue, 1 Oct 2002 19:18:51 -0400; Jim, MMTTY. At least, it sounds to me as if the AGC in your receiver is knocking down the strength of the signal before it ever gets to MMTTY. If that is the case, what you want to do is put the offe; /archives//html/RTTY/2002-10/msg00016.html (8,018 bytes)
2. [RTTY] vp8thu now on (score: 1): Author: ve3iay@storm.ca (Richard Ferch); Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2002 18:00:47 -0500; Congrats! does Depends. If you are using AFSK, the MMTTY Rev button reverses both TX and RX. The most common use for this is for people who prefer to use USB rather than LSB. If you are using FSK, t; /archives//html/RTTY/2002-01/msg00266.html (6,643 bytes)
3. [RTTY] The SO1R/SO2R debate (score: 1): Author: ve3iay@storm.ca; Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2006 01:05:01 -0400; I think this discussion is getting overheated. Adding or not adding another category will not mean the end of contesting as we know it. People who take the other side of the argument are not ogres or; /archives//html/RTTY/2006-07/msg00350.html (7,735 bytes)
4. [RTTY] Re the LoTW stats (score: 1): Author: "Richard Ferch" <ve3iay@storm.ca>; Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2007 18:23:51 -0500; Hi Phil and the group, 2006: W/K RTTY: 67% VE RTTY: 74% DX RTTY: 35% W/K CW: 36% VE CW: 38% DX CW: 21% 2007 up to Nov. 18: W/K RTTY: 65% VE RTTY: 65% DX RTTY: 22% W/K CW: 38% VE CW: 32% DX CW: 22% CQ; /archives//html/RTTY/2007-11/msg00267.html (6,958 bytes)
5. Re: [RTTY] 150 million qsos (score: 1): Author: "Richard Ferch" <ve3iay@storm.ca>; Date: Mon, 24 Dec 2007 08:08:55 -0500; capability Identical comments apply to the DXKeeper/WinWarbler combination (<http://www.dxlabsuite.com>). 73, Rich VE3KI _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contest; /archives//html/RTTY/2007-12/msg00169.html (7,562 bytes)
6. Re: [RTTY] Contesting from other than home QTH (score: 1): Author: "Richard Ferch" <ve3iay@storm.ca>; Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2008 18:40:20 -0500; I believe the convention is that if you used your own call sign (KK6T) in the contest, you would put @W6XXXX in the OPERATORS line in the Cabrillo file. This would be indicated in the results by KK6T; /archives//html/RTTY/2008-02/msg00349.html (7,992 bytes)
7. Re: [RTTY] LSB - USB ON RTTY (score: 1): Author: "Richard Ferch" <ve3iay@storm.ca>; Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2008 12:54:26 -0400; The amateur standard is to use mark as the higher RF frequency. It doesn't matter whether you use the lower sideband with mark as the lower audio tone or the upper sideband with mark as the higher au; /archives//html/RTTY/2008-03/msg00251.html (7,879 bytes)
8. Re: [RTTY] RTTY RU Band Changes (score: 1): Author: "Richard Ferch" <ve3iay@storm.ca>; Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2008 15:14:00 -0500; Steve, As long as you have one or two off periods that between them add up to the required 6 hours, it does not matter how many other off periods you have. The rules only say that you must operate no; /archives//html/RTTY/2008-12/msg00169.html (7,946 bytes)
9. Re: [RTTY] looking for the person that helped WB5AAA (score: 1): Author: "Richard Ferch" <ve3iay@storm.ca>; Date: Sun, 1 Mar 2009 21:04:32 -0500; It certainly has nothing to do with USB vs. LSB. If someone was going to be off-frequency for this reason, they would be off by 2-4 kHz, which I am quite sure is far outside the range of errors you h; /archives//html/RTTY/2009-03/msg00058.html (8,815 bytes)
10. Re: [RTTY] Exchanges for the NAQP RTTY Contest (score: 1): Author: Richard Ferch <ve3iay@storm.ca>; Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2009 22:20:53 -0400; I believe someone doing this is probably a contest newbie - or at least, they are certainly acting like one. Newbies often act as if they were unaware that there is often more than one station respon; /archives//html/RTTY/2009-07/msg00075.html (8,451 bytes)
11. Re: [RTTY] USB adapter Interface (score: 1): Author: Richard Ferch <ve3iay@storm.ca>; Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2009 08:22:08 -0400; Bill, The "no output" from your test using COM13 directly in MMTTY indicates that your USB-to-serial adapter does not support the 45 baud speed you need for RTTY. You will almost certainly have to us; /archives//html/RTTY/2009-07/msg00133.html (11,054 bytes)
12. Re: [RTTY] USB to Serial Convertors (score: 1): Author: Richard Ferch <ve3iay@storm.ca>; Date: Sat, 01 Aug 2009 06:42:59 -0400; Andrei, Does this work for FSK from MMTTY *without* using EXTFSK? As far as I am aware, basically any USB-to-serial adapter will work with EXTFSK - there's nothing remarkable about that. It's using t; /archives//html/RTTY/2009-08/msg00000.html (7,169 bytes)
13. Re: [RTTY] USB to Serial Convertors (score: 1): Author: Richard Ferch <ve3iay@storm.ca>; Date: Sat, 01 Aug 2009 12:22:58 -0400; Thanks, Jim, Andrei and Jay. That's good news. The common thread to all of these appears to be that they are multi-port devices. It appears that you have at least a reasonable chance (but no guarante; /archives//html/RTTY/2009-08/msg00005.html (7,806 bytes)
14. Re: [RTTY] Crystal filter width preferences for RTTY contesting (score: 1): Author: Richard Ferch <ve3iay@storm.ca>; Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2009 20:01:02 -0400; I'm not so sure that's a major concern. Maybe I am atypical, but on average I tend to use narrower IF filtering in RTTY than I do in CW. I have a K3 with the "250 Hz" (actually 370 Hz) roofing filter; /archives//html/RTTY/2009-08/msg00142.html (10,905 bytes)
15. Re: [RTTY] Mix-W Log Format (score: 1): Author: Richard Ferch <ve3iay@storm.ca>; Date: Fri, 02 Oct 2009 16:56:37 -0400; Ed, The last time I used MixW in the CQ WW RTTY was in 2002 as VE3IAY, but I still use it for PSK31 and for testing, and I am familiar enough with it to be fairly certain where these problems origina; /archives//html/RTTY/2009-10/msg00010.html (12,323 bytes)
16. Re: [RTTY] NA SPRINT (score: 1): Author: Richard Ferch <ve3iay@storm.ca>; Date: Fri, 09 Oct 2009 17:34:35 -0400; Dick, The Sprint is not a DX contest where many of the signals you work may be weak and where repeating the exchange can prevent lots of repeat requests. In the Sprint, there can be several loud stat; /archives//html/RTTY/2009-10/msg00049.html (10,401 bytes)
17. Re: [RTTY] MMTTY macro setup question (score: 1): Author: Richard Ferch <ve3iay@storm.ca>; Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2009 14:33:14 -0400; RY is a relic from hardware teleprinter times, as Iain has pointed out. It might be useful for some kinds of spectral purity tests, as it sends the closest possible RTTY approximation to a square wav; /archives//html/RTTY/2009-10/msg00078.html (7,582 bytes)
18. Re: [RTTY] ARRL RTTY (score: 1): Author: Richard Ferch <ve3iay@storm.ca>; Date: Tue, 05 Jan 2010 14:47:45 -0500; I'll be bold enough to add to what Ed said on this: I use a radio with two receivers (a K3), but only a single antenna (a multi-band vertical), and have found several advantages over a single receive; /archives//html/RTTY/2010-01/msg00095.html (11,295 bytes)
19. Re: [RTTY] ARRL RTTY (score: 1): Author: Richard Ferch <ve3iay@storm.ca>; Date: Thu, 07 Jan 2010 23:11:30 -0500; Not hardly. Take a look at my claimed score on 3830 before you say that! Seriously, the ability to do SO2V in RTTY depends mainly on two things: hardware (a radio with two receivers capable of receiv; /archives//html/RTTY/2010-01/msg00160.html (9,055 bytes)
20. Re: [RTTY] Sound Cards (score: 1): Author: Richard Ferch <ve3iay@storm.ca>; Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2010 14:18:51 -0500; The performance requirements for an SDR and for RTTY are totally different. In an SDR, the number of bits of resolution translates to dynamic range - the more bits, the more dynamic range. 16 bits is; /archives//html/RTTY/2010-01/msg00221.html (9,649 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2] [3]