Mail Archive Search: <+from:ve3iay@rac.ca>

Results:

References: [ +from:ve3iay@rac.ca: 54 ]

Total 54 documents matching your query.

41. Re: [RTTY] AFSK Splatter (score: 1): Author: Richard Ferch <ve3iay@rac.ca>; Date: Sun, 23 Oct 2005 10:18:50 -0400; I would suggest neither. They should both be set so as to distribute the gain to avoid overdriving (audio harmonics or IMD) or excessive noise-to-signal ratio in any one stage. Don't run your sound c; /archives//html/RTTY/2005-10/msg00280.html (9,105 bytes)
42. Re: [RTTY] STDYKN ?? (score: 1): Author: Richard Ferch <ve3iay@rac.ca>; Date: Wed, 07 Dec 2005 17:05:42 -0500; Uh, not quite, Phil. Right-clicking in MTTY will change between FIGS and LTRS case, so STDYKN would become '5$6(, which is not very helpful. Converting between FIGS and LTRS is easy; the trouble with; /archives//html/RTTY/2005-12/msg00038.html (8,291 bytes)
43. Re: [RTTY] ARRL RTTY Round-Up Rules - QUESTIONs about band changes,etc. (score: 1): Author: Richard Ferch <ve3iay@rac.ca>; Date: Sat, 10 Dec 2005 11:16:33 -0500; Re band changes and categories, I read the rules the same way Dave does, and draw a couple of other conclusions (these are *not* complaints, just observations): If you are a single-op and use packet,; /archives//html/RTTY/2005-12/msg00052.html (7,438 bytes)
44. Re: [RTTY] ARRL RTTY Round-Up Rules - QUESTIONs about band changes,etc. (score: 1): Author: Richard Ferch <ve3iay@rac.ca>; Date: Sat, 10 Dec 2005 18:00:47 -0500; Thanks for pointing that out, Barry. Note that "the primary use of a second radio..." WOULD BE "...to get additional QSOs" - the point is that the rules do not permit such a second radio. I'm not sur; /archives//html/RTTY/2005-12/msg00060.html (9,096 bytes)
45. Re: [RTTY] Telnet/Packet and the RTTY RU (score: 1): Author: Richard Ferch <ve3iay@rac.ca>; Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2005 09:38:36 -0500; Under the present rules, regardless of whether you agree with them or not, there are only two categories: 1. Single operator - only one person, NO relief operators, NO helpers in the shack, NO helper; /archives//html/RTTY/2005-12/msg00107.html (9,012 bytes)
46. Re: [RTTY] Telnet/Packet and the RTTY RU (score: 1): Author: Richard Ferch <ve3iay@rac.ca>; Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2005 13:07:27 -0500; Oh, don't get me wrong, Dennis. I think the rules for multi-ops in the Roundup are perfectly *fair*, that's not the issue. The point for me is that they result in a contest that can be *boring* for m; /archives//html/RTTY/2005-12/msg00137.html (15,628 bytes)
47. Re: [RTTY] dashes vs. no dashes (score: 1): Author: Richard Ferch <ve3iay@rac.ca>; Date: Sun, 01 Jan 2006 10:52:20 -0500; The situation with UOS is actually more complicated. There are two different places where you can select UOS in MMTTY, one on the main window that only affects receive, and one under the Options/TX t; /archives//html/RTTY/2006-01/msg00005.html (12,042 bytes)
48. Re: [RTTY] Displaying/logging/spotting the correct FRQ using AFSK (score: 1): Author: Richard Ferch <ve3iay@rac.ca>; Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2006 12:09:26 -0500; An additional note: In N1MM Logger you can turn this option on or off in the Digital Interface window - it's the last item in the Setup menu in the DI window. You should turn it on for AFSK, off for; /archives//html/RTTY/2006-01/msg00242.html (9,753 bytes)
49. Re: [RTTY] [CQ-Contest] 40 meters on Saturday evening (score: 1): Author: Richard Ferch <ve3iay@rac.ca>; Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2006 12:33:50 -0500; Many of the folks here on the rtty reflector are also on the CQ-contest reflector, but in case there are some who are not, there's a heads-up there from N6TR about what to expect on Saturday evening; /archives//html/RTTY/2006-02/msg00113.html (7,432 bytes)
50. Re: [RTTY] MixW on RTTY (score: 1): Author: Richard Ferch <ve3iay@rac.ca>; Date: Sat, 04 Mar 2006 15:08:46 -0500; Actually, this doesn't imbed MMTTY into MixW at all - it simply calls up MMTTY as an external program. You can call up *any* program (Excel, for example) in exactly the same way. There is no transfer; /archives//html/RTTY/2006-03/msg00079.html (9,723 bytes)
51. Re: [RTTY] MixW on RTTY (score: 1): Author: Richard Ferch <ve3iay@rac.ca>; Date: Sat, 04 Mar 2006 18:19:02 -0500; Actually it's not unreasonable or unexpected. MixW has a perfectly good RTTY engine of its own - I often use it as a backup to the MMTTY/N1MM combination, as it quite often does a better job of decod; /archives//html/RTTY/2006-03/msg00088.html (7,354 bytes)
52. Re: [RTTY] contest name from Dec 1 2001? (score: 1): Author: Richard Ferch <ve3iay@rac.ca>; Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2006 12:30:13 -0400; TARA RTTY Sprint. A belated thanks for the QSO! 73, Rich VE3IAY _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty; /archives//html/RTTY/2006-07/msg00050.html (7,193 bytes)
53. [RTTY] Multipliers (score: 1): Author: ve3iay@rac.ca; Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2006 09:39:52 -0400; The BARTG, EA RTTY, SARTG and JARTS contests all use call areas in JA/VE/VK/W as multipliers. WAE adds several others (ZL, ZS, PY, UA9). It appears that the idea was that people living in those count; /archives//html/RTTY/2006-07/msg00482.html (8,233 bytes)
54. Re: [RTTY] Makrothen RTTY Contest (score: 1): Author: Richard Ferch <ve3iay@rac.ca>; Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 17:56:04 -0400; According to the contest database at <http://www.rtty-contest-scene.com/index1.html>, there were 288 logs submitted in 2004 and 399 logs in 2005. Here in the Eastern time zone, you can work 8 hours; /archives//html/RTTY/2006-09/msg00237.html (7,809 bytes)

Current List: 41 - 54
Page: [1] [2] [3]