Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:ve3iay@rac.ca: 54 ]

Total 54 documents matching your query.

21. Re: [RTTY] A repository of (poor) RTTY recordings? (score: 1)
Author: Richard Ferch <ve3iay@rac.ca>
Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2004 07:00:48 -0400
On Wed, 21 Apr 2004 19:28:27 -0700 Bill Turner wrote: With all due respect Richard, I think it does matter what the text is. Which of the following would be easier to find errors in: GMANCUDKLJERJKSL
/archives//html/RTTY/2004-04/msg00257.html (10,948 bytes)

22. RE: [RTTY] KAM Plus and MMTTY (score: 1)
Author: Richard Ferch <ve3iay@rac.ca>
Date: Sat, 08 May 2004 07:21:38 -0400
Dave, I think Jim's main point is that you cannot use MMTTY to control the KAM; MMTTY's function is to replace the KAM, not to control it. To control the KAM you need other software instead of or in
/archives//html/RTTY/2004-05/msg00044.html (8,985 bytes)

23. Re: [RTTY] KAM Plus and MMTTY (score: 1)
Author: Richard Ferch <ve3iay@rac.ca>
Date: Sat, 08 May 2004 07:29:13 -0400
Hey guys, I don't think Pete was asking which is better, he was just trying to find out how to get them both to work. Let's get his setup working and let him decide for himself. Rich ________________
/archives//html/RTTY/2004-05/msg00045.html (6,876 bytes)

24. Re:[RTTY] [NCCC] Fwd: Warning: could not send message for past 4 hours (score: 1)
Author: Richard Ferch <ve3iay@rac.ca>
Date: Sun, 18 Jul 2004 23:09:48 -0400
Mine got bounced too (sent at about 9 AM Eastern time this morning, bounce message came back 4 hours later). I'm not sure whether to believe the note in the bounce message that says it will keep tryi
/archives//html/RTTY/2004-07/msg00194.html (7,487 bytes)

25. Re: [RTTY] Re: new SCC rules (score: 1)
Author: Richard Ferch <ve3iay@rac.ca>
Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2004 20:06:40 -0400
On Wed, 11 Aug 2004 15:56:40 -0700 Bill Turner wrote: The accepted definition of a RTTY frequency is the frequency of the MARK signal as transmitted over the air. It doesn't matter how it's generated
/archives//html/RTTY/2004-08/msg00105.html (6,809 bytes)

26. Re: [RTTY] Multi-mode interface QST article? (score: 1)
Author: Richard Ferch <ve3iay@rac.ca>
Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2004 08:39:34 -0400
Re the n9art interface article: be warned that this interface is not really compatible with any of today's sound-card digital software. The vast majority of the circuit is a Hamcomm-style interface f
/archives//html/RTTY/2004-08/msg00107.html (7,188 bytes)

27. Re: [RTTY] my LoTW stats (score: 1)
Author: Richard Ferch <ve3iay@rac.ca>
Date: Fri, 10 Sep 2004 19:16:14 -0400
On Fri, 10 Sep 2004 at 07:55:48 -0400, Jim Reisert said: At 10:59 PM 9/9/2004, FireBrick wrote: I'm sorry guys, I don't understand this. I most certainly did pick a fixed width font. And....if I go t
/archives//html/RTTY/2004-09/msg00053.html (8,411 bytes)

28. Re: [RTTY] USB to Serial adapters (score: 1)
Author: Richard Ferch <ve3iay@rac.ca>
Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2004 20:25:42 -0400
If you are looking for a USB to serial adapter that will support 5-bit Baudot characters, you may have difficulty. However, if you are using MMTTY, you can download the comfsk105.zip file from the MM
/archives//html/RTTY/2004-09/msg00150.html (8,044 bytes)

29. Re: [RTTY] Off subject (score: 1)
Author: Richard Ferch <ve3iay@rac.ca>
Date: Fri, 08 Oct 2004 07:34:40 -0400
On Thu, 7 Oct 2004 at 19:14:50 -0500, Larry W0ETC said: Possibly BV is a typo for VB as in Visual Basic????? As Bill W6WRT has noted and as the title of this thread indicates, this has nothing to do
/archives//html/RTTY/2004-10/msg00082.html (6,956 bytes)

30. Re: [RTTY] DESREVER (score: 1)
Author: Richard Ferch <ve3iay@rac.ca>
Date: Sat, 16 Oct 2004 09:20:33 -0400
I agree with everything Bill, Chen and Goetz have just posted, and would like to add one more comment: AFAIK, by far the easiest way to get your TX and RX out of whack with each other is to use FSK w
/archives//html/RTTY/2004-10/msg00168.html (9,593 bytes)

31. Re: [RTTY] DESREVER (score: 1)
Author: Richard Ferch <ve3iay@rac.ca>
Date: Sat, 16 Oct 2004 11:23:06 -0400
At 09:35 AM 16/10/2004, FireBrick wrote: hmmmm, that's not been my experience at all Richard. I use a FT1000MP which has a menu bug. You have to set the menu to 'reverse' for it to send FSK right sid
/archives//html/RTTY/2004-10/msg00170.html (9,923 bytes)

32. Re: [RTTY] Thanks (score: 1)
Author: Richard Ferch <ve3iay@rac.ca>
Date: Sun, 17 Oct 2004 00:06:15 -0400
I agree with Bill. These days anyone can download free RTTY software and get on the air. This sounds to me like a more sophisticated version of the shameful trick some people have, especially on 40m,
/archives//html/RTTY/2004-10/msg00174.html (8,444 bytes)

33. Re: Re: [RTTY] Pet Peeve (score: 1)
Author: Richard Ferch <ve3iay@rac.ca>
Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2004 19:00:42 -0400
W4UK said: One minor point: it takes TWO characters to send what we think of as a carriage return. The <CR> character is 01000 and the <LF> is 00010. Both characters have to be received 100% OK for i
/archives//html/RTTY/2004-10/msg00246.html (10,853 bytes)

34. Re: Re: [RTTY] Pet Peeve (score: 1)
Author: Richard Ferch <ve3iay@rac.ca>
Date: Tue, 19 Oct 2004 21:15:10 -0400
At 10:25 PM 18/10/2004, W4UK wrote: <snip> I agree that a separator at the end of a buffer is needed. I also have spaces at the end of all my buffers to make sure my text is clear. They are sent by W
/archives//html/RTTY/2004-10/msg00284.html (8,648 bytes)

35. Re: [RTTY] Green Keys vs. PSK31 - One man's opinion (score: 1)
Author: Richard Ferch <ve3iay@rac.ca>
Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2005 12:40:39 -0500
Ian White wrote: The difference between PSK and RTTY operating seems to be a 'cultural' thing. Lots of PSK operators are not into DXing and contesting, but into slow-paced ragchewing involving very l
/archives//html/RTTY/2005-01/msg00250.html (10,877 bytes)

36. Re: [RTTY] Keyboard Won't Send All the Letters? (score: 1)
Author: Richard Ferch <ve3iay@rac.ca>
Date: Fri, 04 Mar 2005 23:51:39 -0500
By any chance does the label on one of your macros contain "&P" (e.g. "S&P Exch")? If so, the label on the macro probably won't show the & on the screen but the P will be underlined. If this is your
/archives//html/RTTY/2005-03/msg00021.html (7,538 bytes)

37. Re: [RTTY] Confusion (score: 1)
Author: Richard Ferch <ve3iay@rac.ca>
Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 07:23:49 -0400
John, It looks as if you were submitting a log for the NAQP RTTY. However, the date of 2005-03-13 in the error message was the date of the last NA RTTY Sprint. That, together with the "serial" number
/archives//html/RTTY/2005-07/msg00221.html (8,167 bytes)

38. Re: [RTTY] RTTY Sweeps (score: 1)
Author: Richard Ferch <ve3iay@rac.ca>
Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2005 21:26:18 -0400
All this talk wishing there was a North American RTTY contest that low power stations could be competitive in, and not one mention of the NAQP RTTY? Is everyone suffering from amnesia? 73, Rich VE3IA
/archives//html/RTTY/2005-09/msg00220.html (7,671 bytes)

39. Re: [RTTY] RTTY Sweeps (score: 1)
Author: Richard Ferch <ve3iay@rac.ca>
Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2005 07:55:10 -0400
As further support for Bob's point, note that many of the contests that support all three modes vary their rules between CW/SSB and RTTY in recognition of the different size of the community: WAE (ev
/archives//html/RTTY/2005-09/msg00229.html (9,497 bytes)

40. Re: [RTTY] Wow! check out this USB to Serial adapter (score: 1)
Author: Richard Ferch <ve3iay@rac.ca>
Date: Sun, 09 Oct 2005 15:57:06 -0400
Just a caveat, Charlie: Dave AA6YQ mentioned rotor control, radio control, CW and TNCs, but he did NOT mention a subject of particular interest on this reflector, namely direct FSK keying. Before pur
/archives//html/RTTY/2005-10/msg00083.html (11,058 bytes)

Current List: 21 - 40
Page: [1] [2] [3]
This search system is powered by Namazu