Mail Archive Search: <+from:ska@bartg.org.uk>

Results:

References: [ +from:ska@bartg.org.uk: 176 ]

Total 176 documents matching your query.

81. Re: [RTTY] WAS RTTY done from LOTW . (score: 1): Author: "John GW4SKA" <ska@bartg.org.uk>; Date: Sat, 26 Nov 2011 09:38:13 -0800; Well done Salvo. Just checked back through my log since getting a tower and beam up in September. 10M has been amazing. Starting with the CQWW and making a few non-contest contacts since, I am only 7; /archives//html/RTTY/2011-11/msg00084.html (9,844 bytes)
82. [RTTY] 10-RTTY Contest (score: 1): Author: "John GW4SKA" <ska@bartg.org.uk>; Date: Mon, 05 Dec 2011 06:03:56 -0800; What a great contest that turned out to be. Started a bit slow here and no sign of any of the Far East / Pacific DX that has been around lately. The band started to open around 07:30 to Europe and wa; /archives//html/RTTY/2011-12/msg00029.html (8,382 bytes)
83. Re: [RTTY] 10m RTTY power levels (score: 1): Author: "John GW4SKA" <ska@bartg.org.uk>; Date: Wed, 07 Dec 2011 12:57:41 -0800; Exactly. That's why power classes in a contest are a waste of time. Unenforceable, unfair, where do you draw the line? I ran 100W to an Optibeam 11-5 at 60ft. Had an email from one station in W8 who; /archives//html/RTTY/2011-12/msg00088.html (9,262 bytes)
84. [RTTY] RTTY Roundup and Email (score: 1): Author: "John GW4SKA" <ska@bartg.org.uk>; Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2012 14:06:52 -0800; Some time during the contest this was sent to me: *Hello John, GW4SKA *I noticed you answering several hams on 15m. I would like to work you on this contest. If you plan on calling CQ, let me know th; /archives//html/RTTY/2012-01/msg00037.html (7,337 bytes)
85. Re: [RTTY] RTTY Exchange (score: 1): Author: "John GW4SKA" <ska@bartg.org.uk>; Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2012 15:21:28 -0800; I'd be happier with line 4: "(CR/LF)599 AZ AZ W7WW " Slower but sure you have the right station coming back. John GW4SKA _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contest; /archives//html/RTTY/2012-01/msg00148.html (10,663 bytes)
86. Re: [RTTY] CQ WPX RTTY (score: 1): Author: "John GW4SKA" <ska@bartg.org.uk>; Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2012 07:51:33 -0800; Dick, Sorry you had the problem with a station too close. This happened to me 3 times in the WPX when I had been holding a frequency for a long time. Each time I went exactly on their frequency and a; /archives//html/RTTY/2012-02/msg00147.html (8,748 bytes)
87. Re: [RTTY] Dupes how to handle (score: 1): Author: "John GW4SKA" <ska@bartg.org.uk>; Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2012 03:18:31 -0800; AFC is an evil device that should be banished from the screen! Far better to net properly. Another reason for off frequency calls is clicking on spots then not listening. Spots are usually going to b; /archives//html/RTTY/2012-02/msg00205.html (13,250 bytes)
88. Re: [RTTY] GU0SUP in WPX (score: 1): Author: "John GW4SKA" <ska@bartg.org.uk>; Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2012 03:24:12 -0800; There would never be a G0SUP in the contest unless Phil operated from England. That's the way the callsigns work here. G4SKA moved to Wales in 1994 and became GW4SKA. If I moved to the Isle of Man it; /archives//html/RTTY/2012-02/msg00206.html (9,934 bytes)
89. Re: [RTTY] SO2R Problem (score: 1): Author: "John GW4SKA" <ska@bartg.org.uk>; Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2012 07:10:53 -0800; And with all those big antennas, do you really NEED 1200 Watts? John GW4SKA _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/l; /archives//html/RTTY/2012-02/msg00215.html (11,494 bytes)
90. Re: [RTTY] RTTY Digest, Vol 110, Issue 28 (score: 1): Author: "John GW4SKA" <ska@bartg.org.uk>; Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2012 08:59:57 -0800; Fine on the QRP, but what's it got to do with the RTTY Digest :-) Maybe some of these threads need to get a new subject when they drift too far 73, John GW4SKA _______________________________________; /archives//html/RTTY/2012-02/msg00225.html (10,805 bytes)
91. Re: [RTTY] WPX funnies (score: 1): Author: "John GW4SKA" <ska@bartg.org.uk>; Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2012 15:12:36 -0800; Dave, Agree, agree, agree .....except for: I work them and if not too busy, hit alt-k, go on the keys and thank them for the contact. They may be non-contesters who need a card from me, friends who h; /archives//html/RTTY/2012-02/msg00281.html (11,855 bytes)
92. Re: [RTTY] Macros again (score: 1): Author: "John GW4SKA" <ska@bartg.org.uk>; Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2012 01:04:54 -0800; I get a few who are definitely working me but have a totally different call in their computer. Maybe the last station they called didn't answer, so they moved on but forgot to wipe the call. It is im; /archives//html/RTTY/2012-02/msg00287.html (11,617 bytes)
93. [RTTY] Mults (score: 1): Author: "John GW4SKA" <ska@bartg.org.uk>; Date: Sat, 25 Feb 2012 02:12:26 -0800; Having a play in the NAQP for the first time tonight and have a very late question. I've read the rules several times but can't find anything that says if mults count once only or once per band. Make; /archives//html/RTTY/2012-02/msg00321.html (6,910 bytes)
94. Re: [RTTY] WB4YDL - NAQP RTTY Team #1 (score: 1): Author: "John GW4SKA" <ska@bartg.org.uk>; Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2012 11:19:08 -0800; Twice I've seen this and not understood it. What is a 'TCG station' ?? John GW4SKA Fully paid up member of the English Language cut the BS club! -- Original Message -- From: "James C. Hall, MD" <hear; /archives//html/RTTY/2012-02/msg00342.html (8,483 bytes)
95. Re: [RTTY] C21HA OQRS (score: 1): Author: "John GW4SKA" <ska@bartg.org.uk>; Date: Fri, 18 May 2012 18:14:30 +0100; Ed, I requested a card on 21st Jan and got it on 1st April, so maybe your application went wrong. Drop them a mail? 73, John GW4SKA _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list R; /archives//html/RTTY/2012-05/msg00247.html (8,503 bytes)
96. Re: [RTTY] BARTG Web site (score: 1): Author: "John GW4SKA" <ska@bartg.org.uk>; Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2012 20:45:07 +0100; The BARTG website is up again after a mix-up over renewal. Sorry for the inconvenience. The forum remains out of action due to a corruption in some coding. The providers are currently trying to put i; /archives//html/RTTY/2012-07/msg00128.html (9,304 bytes)
97. Re: [RTTY] AFSK to FSK converter (score: 1): Author: "John GW4SKA" <ska@bartg.org.uk>; Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2012 19:12:11 +0100; OOK ... I still have an ATU-1000 here run in parallel with the soundcard at times. Nice buttons on the front panel that choose between mark and space, mark only or space only. I bet some folks here d; /archives//html/RTTY/2012-09/msg00085.html (14,563 bytes)
98. Re: [RTTY] Heathkit SB-1000 On RTTY (score: 1): Author: "John GW4SKA" <ska@bartg.org.uk>; Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2012 17:00:11 +0100; My old 3-500Z amp would run around 300-350W output in RTTY contests without getting too hot. That was with a decent fan and a chimney round the tube. Your plate current for that output would be 225-2; /archives//html/RTTY/2012-09/msg00114.html (8,781 bytes)
99. Re: [RTTY] CQ-WW-RTTY Cabrillo format (score: 1): Author: "John GW4SKA" <ska@bartg.org.uk>; Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2012 22:44:33 +0100; It's a real shame that these problems come up with well known RTTY software. We have seen similar issues with BARTG contest logs. There is a Cabrillo format for each RTTY contest. Software comes up w; /archives//html/RTTY/2012-10/msg00033.html (10,114 bytes)
100. Re: [RTTY] B4 (score: 1): Author: "John GW4SKA" <ska@bartg.org.uk>; Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2012 22:50:00 +0100; Agree with all you say Shelby. Put your scores, brags and moans on 3830 if you must. It's the right place for them. 73, John GW4SKA "banning QSO B4 from the airwaves" If banning B4 from the airwaves; /archives//html/RTTY/2012-10/msg00034.html (9,413 bytes)

Current List: 81 - 100
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9]