- 101. Re: [RTTY] B4 (score: 1)
- Author: "John GW4SKA" <ska@bartg.org.uk>
- Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2012 12:30:30 +0100
- 3830 is specifically for scores and comments .. it's made just for those posts. If everyone put them on the reflector it would wipe out everything else. The regular summary of claimed scores posted h
- /archives//html/RTTY/2012-10/msg00049.html (12,864 bytes)
- 102. Re: [RTTY] B4 - another angle to it (score: 1)
- Author: "John GW4SKA" <ska@bartg.org.uk>
- Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2012 13:45:29 +0100
- Very good reasons to just work them again. Maybe his log is wrong, maybe my log is wrong but it doesn't matter. Any dupes just get binned when the log is scored, without any penalties. It also keeps
- /archives//html/RTTY/2012-10/msg00051.html (9,801 bytes)
- 103. Re: [RTTY] CQ WW RTTY Contest Log Deadline (score: 1)
- Author: "John GW4SKA" <ska@bartg.org.uk>
- Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2012 14:44:45 +0100
- Trevor .. get more positive! We don't get terrible prop all the time. Your score with the gear you have is way down on what is possible. SO2R may give you another 30% if you are good (figures from Do
- /archives//html/RTTY/2012-10/msg00210.html (9,575 bytes)
- 104. [RTTY] Creed 25 (score: 1)
- Author: "John GW4SKA" <ska@bartg.org.uk>
- Date: Mon, 05 Nov 2012 09:30:08 -0500
- Does anyone have a spare Creed 25 reperforator? A friend is setting up some historic computer gear and needs a 25 to keep it in period. Please contact me direct as it's hardly of interest here! Cheer
- /archives//html/RTTY/2012-11/msg00012.html (6,345 bytes)
- 105. Re: [RTTY] 10m WAS (score: 1)
- Author: "John GW4SKA" <ska@bartg.org.uk>
- Date: Thu, 08 Nov 2012 08:44:04 -0500
- Congratulations Ron. I can't see the problem with WAS on10m. 80m is a real pain though :-) Cheers, John GW4SKA I just got my 10m RTTY WAS certificate, #438. If that's the correct number it's no wonde
- /archives//html/RTTY/2012-11/msg00020.html (7,652 bytes)
- 106. Re: [RTTY] CO8LY (score: 1)
- Author: "John GW4SKA" <ska@bartg.org.uk>
- Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2012 13:39:14 -0500
- Thanks Don. It certainly makes you stop and think how lucky most of us are. Let's hope to see CO8LY back in his home soon, then maybe he will get back on the screen as well. Cheers, John GW4SKA CO8LY
- /archives//html/RTTY/2012-11/msg00069.html (7,722 bytes)
- 107. [RTTY] Teleprinters (score: 1)
- Author: "John GW4SKA" <ska@bartg.org.uk>
- Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2012 11:29:32 -0500
- Just did a search 'teleprinters' on ebay. Was amused to find a copy of the RSGB Teleprinter Handbook in the "fiction-genre fiction" category. Then spotted "723 Mechanical Teleprinter Patents on CD-RO
- /archives//html/RTTY/2012-11/msg00077.html (6,475 bytes)
- 108. Re: [RTTY] BARTG Sprint 2013 (score: 1)
- Author: "John GW4SKA" <ska@bartg.org.uk>
- Date: Mon, 07 Jan 2013 07:50:03 -0500
- Gary, Ken, you have said it all. The rules work for the rest of the world ... it's the mess with calls in the US that is raising this question. Something more important is the difficulty in assessing
- /archives//html/RTTY/2013-01/msg00036.html (12,904 bytes)
- 109. Re: [RTTY] Cabrillo Converter (score: 1)
- Author: "John GW4SKA" <ska@bartg.org.uk>
- Date: Mon, 07 Jan 2013 12:20:01 -0500
- Randy, send it to me with your details (class entered, name, address) and I will convert it for you. John GW4SKA ska@bartg.org.uk Hello, I am still using RTTY5.02 by WF1B for the RTTY contests. I use
- /archives//html/RTTY/2013-01/msg00045.html (8,167 bytes)
- 110. Re: [RTTY] BARTG Sprint 2013 (score: 1)
- Author: "John GW4SKA" <ska@bartg.org.uk>
- Date: Tue, 08 Jan 2013 19:34:59 -0500
- Joe, You know that a G station DOES change calls within different areas of the UK. G, F and DL are also just a little bit smaller than the United States. *Otherwise* keep your nose out of US regulato
- /archives//html/RTTY/2013-01/msg00127.html (17,000 bytes)
- 111. Re: [RTTY] US call signs (BARTG) (score: 1)
- Author: "John GW4SKA" <ska@bartg.org.uk>
- Date: Wed, 09 Jan 2013 20:20:11 -0500
- Let's say that you are W6XXX operating from Florida, and you enter the BARTG contest as W6XXX only. If your log was to be classed as a check-log only, because you weren't following the rules, would y
- /archives//html/RTTY/2013-01/msg00169.html (11,218 bytes)
- 112. Re: [RTTY] AFSK Tips (score: 1)
- Author: "John GW4SKA" <ska@bartg.org.uk>
- Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2013 10:30:15 -0500
- If you want to avoid any problems with not hearing stations through AFC pulling off to one side, forgetting to switch AFC/NET on and off and general confusion, don't use them. Just use the RIT or 2nd
- /archives//html/RTTY/2013-01/msg00301.html (9,751 bytes)
- 113. Re: [RTTY] BARTG Sprint Cabrillo.log (score: 1)
- Author: "John GW4SKA" <ska@bartg.org.uk>
- Date: Fri, 01 Feb 2013 18:38:41 -0500
- Bob, Better if you ask the BARTG contest manager direct. Arthur Bard G1XKZ [arthur.bard@btinternet.com] is the manager. You may not get an acknowledgement for your log immediately but you will get a
- /archives//html/RTTY/2013-02/msg00008.html (9,036 bytes)
- 114. Re: [RTTY] BARTG Sprint Cabrillo.log (score: 1)
- Author: "John GW4SKA" <ska@bartg.org.uk>
- Date: Sat, 02 Feb 2013 16:23:00 -0500
- Better if you ask the BARTG contest manager direct. Arthur Bard G1XKZ [arthur.bard@btinternet.com] is the manager. You may not get an acknowledgement for your log immediately but you will get a repor
- /archives//html/RTTY/2013-02/msg00021.html (8,570 bytes)
- 115. Re: [RTTY] WPX suggestion (score: 1)
- Author: "John GW4SKA" <ska@bartg.org.uk>
- Date: Fri, 08 Feb 2013 11:57:53 -0500
- Manually ... you mean typing something on the keyboard? John GW4SKA I usually send the serial number 599 exchange manually with: 599 AND SERIAL NUMBER ALSO 599 599 73, Don AA5AU and after you send #
- /archives//html/RTTY/2013-02/msg00113.html (11,343 bytes)
- 116. Re: [RTTY] Dash vs space Etc. (score: 1)
- Author: "John GW4SKA" <ska@bartg.org.uk>
- Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2013 18:36:35 -0500
- The letters aren't wrongly sent by some stations and you didn't receive them fine. They have actually sent some data that you decode as letters, then a special character that shifts your decoder to n
- /archives//html/RTTY/2013-02/msg00256.html (12,101 bytes)
- 117. Re: [RTTY] Debate (score: 1)
- Author: "John GW4SKA" <ska@bartg.org.uk>
- Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2013 06:56:12 -0500
- The BARTG Expert rules were intended to 'burden' the minority of SOAB stations running SO2R. It simply puts them all together in a class with an 'expert' label. This leaves the SO1R majority (the 'ca
- /archives//html/RTTY/2013-02/msg00373.html (10,114 bytes)
- 118. Re: [RTTY] BARTG (score: 1)
- Author: "John GW4SKA" <ska@bartg.org.uk>
- Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2013 12:33:59 -0500
- It's not a good question! The rules are on the BARTG website and clearly state: 'No station may enter more than one class.' Torben contacted BARTG and I have let him know the answer. The other questi
- /archives//html/RTTY/2013-03/msg00088.html (10,561 bytes)
- 119. Re: [RTTY] BARTG (score: 1)
- Author: "John GW4SKA" <ska@bartg.org.uk>
- Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2013 12:37:38 -0500
- -- Original Message -- From: "Al Kozakiewicz" <akozak@hourglass.com> To: "Don AA5AU" <aa5au@bellsouth.net>; "RTTY" <rtty@contesting.com> Cc: <arthur.bard@btinternet.com> Sent: Friday, March 15, 2013
- /archives//html/RTTY/2013-03/msg00089.html (8,871 bytes)
- 120. Re: [RTTY] [Amps] BAD DEAL STAY AWAY! / an alternative source (score: 1)
- Author: "John GW4SKA" <ska@bartg.org.uk>
- Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2013 13:47:05 -0500
- Biggest problem for me as a seller is that the feedback looks perfect but the buyer could be a really bad payer. Every time I get a non-payer they have 100% good feedback .. it's just not a true pict
- /archives//html/RTTY/2013-03/msg00145.html (11,342 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu