- 1. [RTTY] Roundup (score: 1)
- Author: "John GW4SKA" <ska@bartg.org.uk>
- Date: Sat, 03 Jan 2009 08:12:04 -0800
- Does the 6 band change per hour rule apply to single ops? It's not clear from the rules. Thanks, John GW4SKA _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http
- /archives//html/RTTY/2009-01/msg00074.html (7,199 bytes)
- 2. [RTTY] BARTG Sprint .. this weekend (score: 1)
- Author: "John GW4SKA" <ska@bartg.org.uk>
- Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 11:28:20 -0800
- Just a reminder that the BARTG rules and Cabrillo templates can be found at: http://www.bartg.org.uk/contests.htm PLEASE NOTE THE E-MAIL ADDRESS FOR LOGS .. IT HAS CHANGED SINCE LAST YEAR. See you at
- /archives//html/RTTY/2009-01/msg00434.html (7,181 bytes)
- 3. Re: [RTTY] BARTG Sprint Rules Questions (score: 1)
- Author: "John GW4SKA" <ska@bartg.org.uk>
- Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2009 04:30:46 -0800
- Hello Ed, No restrictions in the rules so do what you like; same with serial numbers. I have just checked the rules on the BARTG web site and there is no mention of dupes. We removed it as it does no
- /archives//html/RTTY/2009-01/msg00486.html (10,803 bytes)
- 4. [RTTY] BARTG Sprint logs (score: 1)
- Author: "John GW4SKA" <ska@bartg.org.uk>
- Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2009 04:39:59 -0800
- Please help me by following the rules on log submission. The subject must include your call and either SOE, SOAB, MO or SWL. Failure to follow this rule will cause the contest manager to get unhappy,
- /archives//html/RTTY/2009-01/msg00488.html (6,435 bytes)
- 5. Re: [RTTY] BARTG Sprint Rules Questions (score: 1)
- Author: "John GW4SKA" <ska@bartg.org.uk>
- Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2009 05:03:45 -0800
- Ed, Sorry about that. You were quite right. I have just found the dupes statement in the PDF, on the website. It shouldn't be there, I don't know why it's there but it will be changed. Thanks for the
- /archives//html/RTTY/2009-01/msg00489.html (12,641 bytes)
- 6. Re: [RTTY] Bartg-Sprint logs (score: 1)
- Author: "John Barber GW4SKA" <ska@bartg.org.uk>
- Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2009 10:17:00 -0800
- No. It's not a robot. It's me, ska@bartg.org.uk, but sometimes me and my computer sleep (in separate rooms). Cheers, John GW4SKA BARTG Contest Manager _______________________________________________
- /archives//html/RTTY/2009-01/msg00634.html (10,111 bytes)
- 7. Re: [RTTY] Bartg-Sprint logs (score: 1)
- Author: "John Barber GW4SKA" <ska@bartg.org.uk>
- Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2009 13:34:58 -0800
- Hi Curt, Here is what happens when a Sprint log comes in: All mail with an attachment gets a standard acknowledgement. If the subject includes a valid class e.g. SOE it gets in to the right folder, w
- /archives//html/RTTY/2009-01/msg00639.html (15,049 bytes)
- 8. [RTTY] BARTG Sprint logs (score: 1)
- Author: "John Barber GW4SKA" <ska@bartg.org.uk>
- Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2009 03:22:26 -0800
- The deadline for BARTG Sprint logs is tomorrow. If you took part in our contest please send me your log, even if just as a check log. If you have already submitted a log you will have received an ack
- /archives//html/RTTY/2009-02/msg00389.html (6,378 bytes)
- 9. Re: [RTTY] BARTG questions (score: 1)
- Author: "John Barber GW4SKA" <ska@bartg.org.uk>
- Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2009 15:16:08 -0800
- Martin, There are no power categories in the BARTG RTTY contests. You are allowed to use the cluster from any source. Generally the best (certainly the most accurate) source of information for any co
- /archives//html/RTTY/2009-03/msg00196.html (8,525 bytes)
- 10. Re: [RTTY] RTTY AMPLIFIER QUESTION.. (score: 1)
- Author: "John Barber GW4SKA" <ska@bartg.org.uk>
- Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2009 03:11:40 -0800
- My homebrew 4CX1000 amp has always been run in Class C for RTTY. The extra power is hardly worth bothering about; the benefits are in general reliability with less strain on power supplies, cooler sh
- /archives//html/RTTY/2009-03/msg00277.html (8,670 bytes)
- 11. [RTTY] BARTG contests (score: 1)
- Author: "John Barber GW4SKA" <ska@bartg.org.uk>
- Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2009 11:59:15 -0800
- Just a reminder that the contest this weekend is the BARTG HF RTTY (not the Sprint) so make sure you set up your logging for the right one. The log must have RST, Serial and Time both sent and receiv
- /archives//html/RTTY/2009-03/msg00286.html (6,576 bytes)
- 12. Re: [RTTY] BARTG contests (score: 1)
- Author: "John Barber GW4SKA" <ska@bartg.org.uk>
- Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2009 16:25:40 -0800
- Eduardo, The rules and log format can be found on the BARTG website at http://www.bartg.org.uk/contests.htm 73, John GW4SKA BARTG Contest Manager _______________________________________________ RTTY
- /archives//html/RTTY/2009-03/msg00290.html (9,334 bytes)
- 13. [RTTY] BARTG Sprint results (score: 1)
- Author: "John Barber GW4SKA" <ska@bartg.org.uk>
- Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2009 16:28:14 -0800
- The 2009 BARTG Sprint results are now up on the website: http://www.bartg.org.uk/contests/Sprint2009results.pdf Cheers, John GW4SKA BARTG Contest Manager _____________________________________________
- /archives//html/RTTY/2009-03/msg00291.html (6,671 bytes)
- 14. Re: [RTTY] RTTY Contesting (score: 1)
- Author: "John Barber GW4SKA" <ska@bartg.org.uk>
- Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2009 03:57:16 -0800
- Just a note on verticals. Don't write off running a vertical with limited radials or not on the ground. It's not the right way to do it but can still give reasonable results if there is no other opti
- /archives//html/RTTY/2009-03/msg00355.html (14,655 bytes)
- 15. Re: [RTTY] RTTY Contesting and Verticals (score: 1)
- Author: "John Barber GW4SKA" <ska@bartg.org.uk>
- Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2009 15:16:26 -0800
- Given a choice between stacked TH7s and my verticals, maybe the beams would win! In the real world of many contesters, especially beginners, not many will have the space or the cash for big towers an
- /archives//html/RTTY/2009-03/msg00375.html (12,471 bytes)
- 16. [RTTY] ANARTS and BARTG contests .. the future (score: 1)
- Author: "John Barber GW4SKA" <ska@bartg.org.uk>
- Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 20:00:56 +0100
- Pat Leeper recently informed me that she would be unable to continue managing the ANARTS RTTY contest due to failing health. She has made every effort to find someone else in VK to take over the cont
- /archives//html/RTTY/2009-03/msg00391.html (7,912 bytes)
- 17. Re: [RTTY] ANARTS and BARTG contests .. the future (score: 1)
- Author: "John Barber GW4SKA" <ska@bartg.org.uk>
- Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2009 18:20:14 +0100
- Biggest problem is the clash with RDXC on CW and Phone. It has got to be a very popular contest and there were even comments on a contest reflector saying how stupid it was to run a RTTY contest on t
- /archives//html/RTTY/2009-03/msg00397.html (12,425 bytes)
- 18. [RTTY] BARTG contests (score: 1)
- Author: "John Barber GW4SKA" <ska@bartg.org.uk>
- Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2009 11:29:56 +0100
- Thanks for all the comments and suggestions. The general opinion seems to be that moving to a June date would be a bad idea, both for propagation and because there are better things to do in June. Th
- /archives//html/RTTY/2009-04/msg00001.html (6,957 bytes)
- 19. Re: [RTTY] EA Contest Rules (score: 1)
- Author: "John Barber GW4SKA" <ska@bartg.org.uk>
- Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2009 00:30:12 +0100
- Unique calls that show up in a contest log occur for many reasons, but most are due to bad logging. These can usually be picked out by the log checker and the contacts flagged as invalid. Contest che
- /archives//html/RTTY/2009-04/msg00032.html (10,788 bytes)
- 20. [RTTY] BARTG logs (score: 1)
- Author: "John Barber GW4SKA" <ska@bartg.org.uk>
- Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 17:45:55 +0100
- The closing date for logs is coming up next week. If you took part in the BARTG HF RTTY Contest and have not sent a log, even if just a checklog, please send it in now to ska@bartg.org.uk Note that I
- /archives//html/RTTY/2009-04/msg00092.html (6,445 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu