- 1. Re: [RTTY] Interesting Buro SWL Card (score: 1)
- Author: "Larry Lowry" <rtty@cebridge.net>
- Date: Sun, 14 Aug 2005 08:57:25 -0500
- Hello All, Just a response to Darren's post. I think RTTY on 160 is as rare as we make it. I have been inactive for quite a long time. I have only made 1 RTTY contact on 160 but listened for it frequ
- /archives//html/RTTY/2005-08/msg00061.html (10,070 bytes)
- 2. Re: [RTTY] 160 Meter RTTY (score: 1)
- Author: "Larry Lowry" <rtty@cebridge.net>
- Date: Sun, 14 Aug 2005 17:25:52 -0500
- Hello All again, I did a quick search to find out just what is the current band plan for 160. Obviously there is room down there. I found the "Recommended" band plan and it looks like it seriously co
- /archives//html/RTTY/2005-08/msg00075.html (19,704 bytes)
- 3. Re: [RTTY] 160 Mtrs (score: 1)
- Author: "Larry Lowry" <rtty@cebridge.net>
- Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2005 21:25:59 -0500
- I was, Larry WD5CFJ. Called CQ several times, only heard one weak station, not strong enough to copy, around midnight CST. My noise level was 10 - 20 over. DSP helped but no luck. Will try again. 73
- /archives//html/RTTY/2005-08/msg00105.html (8,541 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu