Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:rkolarik@neb.rr.com: 275 ]

Total 275 documents matching your query.

221. [RTTY] 7082 Winmor interference (score: 1)
Author: Ron Kolarik <rkolarik@neb.rr.com>
Date: Thu, 05 Feb 2015 20:55:13 -0600
If you got blasted by the real wide Winmor tonight on 7082 the callsign associated with it is W0ECM-1. I sent him an email about a week ago to let him know he has a problem, no answer. According to t
/archives//html/RTTY/2015-02/msg00003.html (6,489 bytes)

222. [RTTY] K1N vs ARRL (score: 1)
Author: Ron Kolarik <rkolarik@neb.rr.com>
Date: Thu, 05 Feb 2015 21:00:23 -0600
It may have been a poor choice of calling frequency, 14095 split down, and when the ARRL bulletin came up right on time it was fun to watch. Lots of yelling and guys submitting a DQRM report. Remembe
/archives//html/RTTY/2015-02/msg00004.html (6,413 bytes)

223. Re: [RTTY] K1N vs ARRL (score: 1)
Author: Ron Kolarik <rkolarik@neb.rr.com>
Date: Sat, 07 Feb 2015 17:10:02 -0600
Pete, while the ARRL bulletins are a special case the problem could easily be solved by adding plus-minus depending on frequency occupancy the way some nets publish their schedule. They also are gett
/archives//html/RTTY/2015-02/msg00015.html (10,204 bytes)

224. [RTTY] RM-11708 (score: 1)
Author: Ron Kolarik <rkolarik@neb.rr.com>
Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2015 00:23:28 -0600
If you don't care about this delete it now. The most recent ARRL Letter has as it's first article a warning about the Mitre license for experimental wideband digital tests. You can read it on the ARR
/archives//html/RTTY/2015-02/msg00140.html (6,907 bytes)

225. Re: [RTTY] ARRL Request for Member comment on Proposed HF Band Plan Change (score: 1)
Author: Ron Kolarik <rkolarik@neb.rr.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2015 19:14:38 -0600
Be sure to read the K1ZZ editorial linked from the article. I also just got some material sent to me about the "unattended" guys pushing for exclusive use of the auto sub bands in their comments to t
/archives//html/RTTY/2015-02/msg00200.html (7,660 bytes)

226. Re: [RTTY] ARRL Request for Member comment on Proposed HF Band Plan Change (score: 1)
Author: Ron Kolarik <rkolarik@neb.rr.com>
Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2015 00:07:56 -0600
Fluorescent yellow vests, wacker lights and DHS grants would be a fair guess and ARRL wants to hold the control strings. Ron K0IDT There are thousands of guys around the world on RTTY and probably ju
/archives//html/RTTY/2015-02/msg00203.html (8,791 bytes)

227. Re: [RTTY] ARRL Request for Member comment on Proposed HF Band Plan Change (score: 1)
Author: Ron Kolarik <rkolarik@neb.rr.com>
Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2015 00:45:46 -0600
Well the Band Plan proposal has stirred up a hornet's nest on the Digital Radio group and the Winlink crowd is soliciting for a letter writing campaign to the committee. I can forward the mail to any
/archives//html/RTTY/2015-02/msg00204.html (8,249 bytes)

228. Re: [RTTY] ARRL Request for Member comment on Proposed HF Band PlanChange (score: 1)
Author: Ron Kolarik <rkolarik@neb.rr.com>
Date: Sun, 01 Mar 2015 22:26:08 -0600
Jeff I sent in my comments to the committee and requested they make the comments and survey results public since they have a track record of not being up front in the past. I don't know if it will go
/archives//html/RTTY/2015-03/msg00008.html (8,689 bytes)

229. Re: [RTTY] ARRL (score: 1)
Author: Ron Kolarik <rkolarik@neb.rr.com>
Date: Sun, 01 Mar 2015 23:39:04 -0600
Ed, Joe has answered most of your points pretty well but he missed a few Lastly, divulge un- encrypting methods for select OO's to police the traffic so rendered. There recently was congratulatory em
/archives//html/RTTY/2015-03/msg00010.html (7,619 bytes)

230. Re: [RTTY] E30FB rtty? (score: 1)
Author: Ron Kolarik <rkolarik@neb.rr.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2015 17:05:28 -0500
Joe at least the skimmers are hearing you. They're weak out here with a tribander and I'm not being heard by the skimmers :(. 73, Ron K0IDT Unfortunately, they are back on 15 meters *now* ... still r
/archives//html/RTTY/2015-03/msg00033.html (10,343 bytes)

231. [RTTY] ARRL band plan (score: 1)
Author: Ron Kolarik <rkolarik@neb.rr.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2015 21:33:20 -0500
The last day for input to the ARRL band plan proposal is the 19th of this month. If you haven't already taken the survey or sent a comment please do it soon. The ACDS guys are pushing to get their us
/archives//html/RTTY/2015-04/msg00053.html (6,924 bytes)

232. Re: [RTTY] ARRL band plan (score: 1)
Author: Ron Kolarik <rkolarik@neb.rr.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2015 23:08:06 -0500
Hi Bill, Here's a few good references to what's going on but in the end it's going to be how you feel about it. http://apps.fcc.gov/ecfs/comment/view?id=60001025941 http://lists.contesting.com/piperm
/archives//html/RTTY/2015-04/msg00055.html (9,094 bytes)

233. Re: [RTTY] ARRL band plan (score: 1)
Author: Ron Kolarik <rkolarik@neb.rr.com>
Date: Sat, 11 Apr 2015 13:49:39 -0500
Actually it may be a good idea. I just got a private email letting me know some of the ACDS users are not happy with the prospect of even more narrow bandwidth signals encroaching on their "channels"
/archives//html/RTTY/2015-04/msg00057.html (11,824 bytes)

234. Re: [RTTY] JT65 QUESTION (score: 1)
Author: Ron Kolarik <rkolarik@neb.rr.com>
Date: Mon, 04 May 2015 21:23:08 -0500
Yes, WAS 160m JT65 but 1.838MHz is the better choice. Nothing special, DX-A for an antenna and usually less than 20 watts out. 73, Ron K0IDT 73 de Jack / W7LD / "Lucky Dog" __________________________
/archives//html/RTTY/2015-05/msg00023.html (7,646 bytes)

235. Re: [RTTY] DE W7LD JT65 HELP THANK YOU ALL (score: 1)
Author: Ron Kolarik <rkolarik@neb.rr.com>
Date: Tue, 05 May 2015 20:15:20 -0500
Hey Jack, Why wait until winter? It's winter in the southern hemisphere and I made my first ever 160m JT65 contact with summer noise levels, first ever contact on 160m for that matter. Any time you c
/archives//html/RTTY/2015-05/msg00037.html (7,993 bytes)

236. [RTTY] ARRL board meeting (score: 1)
Author: Ron Kolarik <rkolarik@neb.rr.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2015 14:56:52 -0500
Just a reminder that ARRL has a board meeting coming up next month, not announced yet. Anything you want to bug your directors about then now's the time. Ron K0IDT ___________________________________
/archives//html/RTTY/2015-06/msg00011.html (6,329 bytes)

237. Re: [RTTY] ARRL Board Meeting - Approved modified HF band plan changes (score: 1)
Author: Ron Kolarik <rkolarik@neb.rr.com>
Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2015 17:39:02 -0500
One thing overlooked so far in the discussion is Novices/Techs already have RTTY/digital privileges on 10m, where are they? It's the easiest and least expensive HF band to get on and play. When I was
/archives//html/RTTY/2015-07/msg00085.html (11,568 bytes)

238. [RTTY] Windows 10 upgrade (score: 1)
Author: Ron Kolarik <rkolarik@neb.rr.com>
Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2015 19:03:14 -0500
I will NOT be upgrading my Win 7 installs <http://thenextweb.com/microsoft/2015/07/29/wind-nos/> Yeah, I know they say you can turn off all the privacy stealing stuff but read the EULA, they can get
/archives//html/RTTY/2015-07/msg00122.html (7,050 bytes)

239. Re: [RTTY] Roundup (score: 1)
Author: Ron Kolarik <rkolarik@neb.rr.com>
Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2015 16:44:19 -0500
Steve, this will get you close http://www.arrl.org/results-records-and-awards then check "Learn more" in the contest results box, lower left then open 2015 Line scores, LCR's and database but not the
/archives//html/RTTY/2015-07/msg00134.html (7,924 bytes)

240. Re: [RTTY] SO2R (score: 1)
Author: Ron Kolarik <rkolarik@neb.rr.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2015 22:21:34 -0500
I only had one station run the RST and zone together and you're right it doesn't seem to work in N1MM+ but it's the first time I used N1MM+ so it could be me. Ron K0IDT 73 Mike K5TRI ________________
/archives//html/RTTY/2015-09/msg00123.html (9,278 bytes)

Current List: 221 - 240
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14]
This search system is powered by Namazu