Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:rkolarik@neb.rr.com: 275 ]

Total 275 documents matching your query.

201. Re: [RTTY] Hardes RTTY Station to Work - EVER (score: 1)
Author: "Ron Kolarik" <rkolarik@neb.rr.com>
Date: Sat, 17 May 2014 12:48:04 -0500
Dick I ran RTTY as W1AW/0 NE, one of many, and UP means just that at least to me. THe smart callers would go up to +2 or so and I could get them first pass. If I said UP 1, that's exactly what I got,
/archives//html/RTTY/2014-05/msg00104.html (8,593 bytes)

202. Re: [RTTY] Hardest RTTY Station to Work - EVER (score: 1)
Author: "Ron Kolarik" <rkolarik@neb.rr.com>
Date: Sat, 17 May 2014 19:08:22 -0500
I was using the multi-rx in MMVARI and would get partial decodes was easy enough but as has been noted when asking for N9Y?? I got everything except that call. Simple, call the N9 until the pile shut
/archives//html/RTTY/2014-05/msg00124.html (11,150 bytes)

203. Re: [RTTY] Commerical Marine Station Using PACTOR (score: 1)
Author: "Ron Kolarik" <rkolarik@neb.rr.com>
Date: Sun, 18 May 2014 12:30:33 -0500
YellowBrick tracking through Iridium allows position reports, SMS, and short 2-way emails. No computer or expensive modem needed and 100% global coverage. http://www.yellowbrick-tracking.com/?page_id
/archives//html/RTTY/2014-05/msg00129.html (8,948 bytes)

204. Re: [RTTY] Hardest RTTY Station to Work - EVER (score: 1)
Author: "Ron Kolarik" <rkolarik@neb.rr.com>
Date: Sun, 18 May 2014 13:00:31 -0500
I had never worked a massive pileup from the "dark side" before this operation either. Learning under fire will either make or break you, I did learn a lot of tricks that will be handy when chasing D
/archives//html/RTTY/2014-05/msg00130.html (12,627 bytes)

205. [RTTY] ARRL National Convention (score: 1)
Author: "Ron Kolarik" <rkolarik@neb.rr.com>
Date: Fri, 23 May 2014 11:38:46 -0500
I just got a registration flyer for the July convention, are any "buttons" going or is that too much over the top? Ron K0IDT _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@con
/archives//html/RTTY/2014-05/msg00165.html (6,365 bytes)

206. Re: [RTTY] 5/22 ARRL BOD meeting (score: 1)
Author: "Ron Kolarik" <rkolarik@neb.rr.com>
Date: Fri, 23 May 2014 18:29:22 -0500
Ethics? Conflict of interest?......nah, that's to easy a target to shoot at :) Ron K0IDT Here is a link to the subject matter: http://www.arrl.org/files/file/About%20ARRL/Board%20Meetings/Special_Mee
/archives//html/RTTY/2014-05/msg00173.html (7,422 bytes)

207. Re: [RTTY] W1AW portables on JT65 (score: 1)
Author: "Ron Kolarik" <rkolarik@neb.rr.com>
Date: Wed, 28 May 2014 23:10:15 -0500
We made a few JT65 contacts for the Nebraska operation. If band conditions are marginal in your time slot it may be worth a try. I had no trouble getting pileups except on 160m and I think that was b
/archives//html/RTTY/2014-05/msg00196.html (8,833 bytes)

208. Re: [RTTY] QRM to W1AW/0 (MO) RTTY (score: 1)
Author: "Ron Kolarik" <rkolarik@neb.rr.com>
Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2014 14:26:16 -0500
Gary you should also go to the temporary Winlink site and the HFlink site and download their "channels", they operate without a published schedule. Stay out of the auto sub bands too even if they are
/archives//html/RTTY/2014-06/msg00024.html (10,849 bytes)

209. [RTTY] RM-11708 (score: 1)
Author: "Ron Kolarik" <rkolarik@neb.rr.com>
Date: Sun, 8 Jun 2014 21:00:45 -0500
I've been debating whether or not to post this to the list but since I've had no answer to my original question, I did get a reply but no answer on how to proceed with a formal complaint, here's what
/archives//html/RTTY/2014-06/msg00090.html (14,765 bytes)

210. Re: [RTTY] Goodbye fellows (score: 1)
Author: "Ron Kolarik" <rkolarik@neb.rr.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2014 20:08:44 -0500
I should apologize as well for starting this latest round. Sorry the thread got hijacked, no particular axe to grind with ARRL except the RM. I'll shut up now but not leaving the list. Ron K0IDT I ap
/archives//html/RTTY/2014-06/msg00147.html (8,999 bytes)

211. [RTTY] Fwd: Southeastern Division Survey Question (score: 1)
Author: "Ron Kolarik" <rkolarik@neb.rr.com>
Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2014 20:56:56 -0500
Just got this, not sure what the point is though. Most techs only have an HT and not interested in HF.....yet. Ron K0IDT _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contest
/archives//html/RTTY/2014-06/msg00301.html (9,956 bytes)

212. Re: [RTTY] ARES E-Letter for July 16, 2014 (score: 1)
Author: Ron Kolarik <rkolarik@neb.rr.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2014 12:09:00 -0500
Joe the event is no different than an annual parade or bike race with amateur radio support and since the US Power Squadron is one of the served agencies for ARES it's nothing to get excited about. O
/archives//html/RTTY/2014-07/msg00067.html (10,493 bytes)

213. Re: [RTTY] W1AW/0 KANSAS RTT (score: 1)
Author: Ron Kolarik <rkolarik@neb.rr.com>
Date: Wed, 05 Nov 2014 14:17:01 -0600
Jeff that's pretty much what I did when it was my turn. It helps spread the pile out once they figure out you won't work more than one on the same frequency. 73, Ron K0IDT Today its 12m & 17m from 18
/archives//html/RTTY/2014-11/msg00008.html (8,280 bytes)

214. Re: [RTTY] W1AW/0 [KS] (score: 1)
Author: Ron Kolarik <rkolarik@neb.rr.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2014 15:55:14 -0600
Mark, here's one video on how it works http://vimeo.com/27314726 I used a similar setup for W1AW/0 from NE and it does work quite well. 73, Ron K0IDT Tnx, Mark And hope AC0C might do a "how to" on hi
/archives//html/RTTY/2014-11/msg00072.html (7,967 bytes)

215. [RTTY] W1AW/9 (score: 1)
Author: Ron Kolarik <rkolarik@neb.rr.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2014 21:05:11 -0600
W1AW/9 is on 160m, 1830 split up and nice signal! Ron K0IDT _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
/archives//html/RTTY/2014-12/msg00031.html (6,390 bytes)

216. Re: [RTTY] W1AW/4 RTTY on 3606.6 QSX UP!! (score: 1)
Author: Ron Kolarik <rkolarik@neb.rr.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2014 23:37:13 -0600
When we operated W1AW/0 NE we had to list all the operators and op times with the coordinator and it had to be kept current with ARRL HQ presumably so they could prevnet things like this. Ron K0IDT U
/archives//html/RTTY/2014-12/msg00062.html (8,143 bytes)

217. Re: [RTTY] Dupes in log? (score: 1)
Author: Ron Kolarik <rkolarik@neb.rr.com>
Date: Sun, 04 Jan 2015 18:09:59 -0600
Leave the dupes in.....you don't know which log is wrong if any and no penalty for leaving them in. Ron K0IDT _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com htt
/archives//html/RTTY/2015-01/msg00038.html (7,275 bytes)

218. Re: [RTTY] Lids running RTTY on the JT65 Freq (score: 1)
Author: Ron Kolarik <rkolarik@neb.rr.com>
Date: Mon, 05 Jan 2015 20:53:04 -0600
Joe I get your point, 9 BWAS JT65 so I'm used to getting flattened by almost every other mode including SSB on 40m, but to penalize a station for operating in a certain frequency range won't work. If
/archives//html/RTTY/2015-01/msg00091.html (8,137 bytes)

219. Re: [RTTY] Contest QRMing of other digimodes (ARRL BOD) (score: 1)
Author: Ron Kolarik <rkolarik@neb.rr.com>
Date: Wed, 07 Jan 2015 20:43:05 -0600
It's a great idea if the results and comments are posted for everyone to read. Ron K0IDT 73/jeff/ac0c www.ac0c.com alpha-charlie-zero-charlie Too late that train has already left. This is from the la
/archives//html/RTTY/2015-01/msg00148.html (9,879 bytes)

220. Re: [RTTY] ARRL BOD minutes published (score: 1)
Author: Ron Kolarik <rkolarik@neb.rr.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2015 23:49:18 -0600
You may want to dig a bit deeper and read the committee reports from that meeting. The HF Band Planning committee recommends giving Novices and Techs data/RTTY privileges on 80m. Technicians are the
/archives//html/RTTY/2015-01/msg00237.html (8,617 bytes)

Current List: 201 - 220
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14]
This search system is powered by Namazu