Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:rkolarik@neb.rr.com: 275 ]

Total 275 documents matching your query.

121. [RTTY] BoD wideband digital (score: 1)
Author: "Ron Kolarik" <rkolarik@neb.rr.com>
Date: Fri, 26 Jul 2013 17:45:26 -0500
Please note the subject change. I got a response back from my director, positive one, but I don't have permission to repost it. I don't want to appear as bashing one mode or another so here's some id
/archives//html/RTTY/2013-07/msg00136.html (10,689 bytes)

122. Re: [RTTY] Question... (score: 1)
Author: "Ron Kolarik" <rkolarik@neb.rr.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2013 21:07:02 -0500
Another question, if all the hams at sea are doing is sending position reports then wouldn't APRS be more appropriate? Ron K0IDT Show some text of some on the ham band, any ham band. Other then ham's
/archives//html/RTTY/2013-07/msg00163.html (8,876 bytes)

123. Re: [RTTY] CQ WPX 2103 results (score: 1)
Author: "Ron Kolarik" <rkolarik@neb.rr.com>
Date: Mon, 5 Aug 2013 13:23:37 -0500
Trevor try here: <http://www.cq-amateur-radio.com/cq_highlights/2013_cq/2013_07_cq/2013_07_cq_Num1_WPX_RTTY_SCORES.pdf> I guess I picked the wrong category to enter, only one I could work at the time
/archives//html/RTTY/2013-08/msg00010.html (7,878 bytes)

124. [RTTY] CQWW robot problem (score: 1)
Author: "Ron Kolarik" <rkolarik@neb.rr.com>
Date: Sun, 29 Sep 2013 19:23:35 -0500
Okay guys where did I mess up, tried to submit a checklog and the robot says that's not a valid category and changed it to 'assisted'? Not terribly important but need to know what I missed. Thanks Ro
/archives//html/RTTY/2013-09/msg00139.html (7,108 bytes)

125. Re: [RTTY] The /qrp thing (score: 1)
Author: "Ron Kolarik" <rkolarik@neb.rr.com>
Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2013 15:32:40 -0500
The other major problem with /QRP is LOTW. Unless the QRP station has set up an account with /QRP he will never get a match if you submit the call as received, at least that's how it used to work. Ro
/archives//html/RTTY/2013-09/msg00192.html (8,004 bytes)

126. Re: [RTTY] Courtesy (score: 1)
Author: "Ron Kolarik" <rkolarik@neb.rr.com>
Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2013 17:51:29 -0500
Steve I rather enjoyed that from Jenny along with the several DX stations that thanked me by name. It's not all about points :) Ron K0IDT -- Original Message -- From: "Steve Bookout" <steve@nr4m.com>
/archives//html/RTTY/2013-09/msg00198.html (8,249 bytes)

127. Re: [RTTY] Warble at beginning of RTTY macro (score: 1)
Author: "Ron Kolarik" <rkolarik@neb.rr.com>
Date: Wed, 2 Oct 2013 19:04:11 -0500
Most likely had RSID turned on, a bit redundant in a RTTY contest :) Ron K0IDT During the CQ WW I had one station return to my call, and for about the first second of his transmit there was a warble
/archives//html/RTTY/2013-10/msg00058.html (7,783 bytes)

128. Re: [RTTY] 160 m (score: 1)
Author: "Ron Kolarik" <rkolarik@neb.rr.com>
Date: Wed, 9 Oct 2013 00:14:39 -0500
Bill I think I told you this before but maybe not. JT65 is a weak signal mode and not low power, run as much as you want. The EME guys are usually full limit with gain antennas. For the record I did
/archives//html/RTTY/2013-10/msg00143.html (9,126 bytes)

129. [RTTY] ARRL Symbol rate proposal (score: 1)
Author: "Ron Kolarik" <rkolarik@neb.rr.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2013 21:48:50 -0500
The latest ARRL letter says the executive committee is going ahead with the 'symbol rate modernization' proposal. Do your research on this and get ready to file concise, technical comments on the FCC
/archives//html/RTTY/2013-10/msg00252.html (6,803 bytes)

130. Re: [RTTY] ARRL Symbol rate proposal (score: 1)
Author: "Ron Kolarik" <rkolarik@neb.rr.com>
Date: Sat, 19 Oct 2013 16:09:42 -0500
Everything that W4TV, W7AY and AA6YQ said should just about cover it for you Peter. The backers of the proposal at the league are all involved with Winlink one way or another and the league has adopt
/archives//html/RTTY/2013-10/msg00278.html (9,946 bytes)

131. Re: [RTTY] ARRL Symbol rate proposal (score: 1)
Author: "Ron Kolarik" <rkolarik@neb.rr.com>
Date: Sat, 19 Oct 2013 16:15:55 -0500
John we had this discussion in another venue and it turned into a circular argument. You want the auto-subbands to be exclusive for the mailboxes? The rest of the world doesn't give a flyin' rip abou
/archives//html/RTTY/2013-10/msg00279.html (10,654 bytes)

132. Re: [RTTY] ARRL Symbol rate proposal (score: 1)
Author: "Ron Kolarik" <rkolarik@neb.rr.com>
Date: Sat, 19 Oct 2013 16:26:03 -0500
As it stands now we can't easily identify offending mailbox operations nor verify the content of the messages, we're supposed to be self-policing and that's impossible with the current conditions. I
/archives//html/RTTY/2013-10/msg00280.html (12,039 bytes)

133. Re: [RTTY] If your birthday was Sunday and you worked theJARTScontest... (score: 1)
Author: "Ron Kolarik" <rkolarik@neb.rr.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2013 20:01:42 -0500
A quick scan of my log shows a peak in the mid 60's for age. I was only playing off and on and trying to help someone with the last 2 for 5BWAS, 235 Q's. He did find me for his needed contacts, close
/archives//html/RTTY/2013-10/msg00340.html (8,835 bytes)

134. [RTTY] test (score: 1)
Author: "Ron Kolarik" <rkolarik@neb.rr.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2013 23:29:41 -0600
Sorry, it appears my ISP is bouncing the RTTY messages again. Ron K0IDT _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listi
/archives//html/RTTY/2013-11/msg00084.html (6,151 bytes)

135. Re: [RTTY] List of Illegal Data modes in the US (score: 1)
Author: "Ron Kolarik" <rkolarik@neb.rr.com>
Date: Sat, 23 Nov 2013 15:07:35 -0600
That would be ROS Chen. The author screwed up the description in the submission to the FCC and got it classified as SS. Still running behind from this viral bug. Ron K0IDT -- Original Message -- From
/archives//html/RTTY/2013-11/msg00193.html (9,321 bytes)

136. Re: [RTTY] ARRL attack on current RTTY users (score: 1)
Author: "Ron Kolarik" <rkolarik@neb.rr.com>
Date: Sat, 23 Nov 2013 20:19:35 -0600
Dave that looks like more lawyer type weasel words. It says it does not change the status of AUTOMATICALLY controlled stations. Look at Sec. IV where the remotely controlled stations are permitted 2.
/archives//html/RTTY/2013-11/msg00209.html (10,674 bytes)

137. [RTTY] Hints and tips on how to file comments on RM-11708 (score: 1)
Author: "Ron Kolarik" <rkolarik@neb.rr.com>
Date: Sat, 23 Nov 2013 23:09:15 -0600
Okay, some questions both on and off list and a few new people arriving to the party. I'm no expert and maybe a someone else could chime in with suggestions. First read the RM and research anything y
/archives//html/RTTY/2013-11/msg00215.html (10,008 bytes)

138. Re: [RTTY] ARRL attack on current RTTY users (score: 1)
Author: "Ron Kolarik" <rkolarik@neb.rr.com>
Date: Sun, 24 Nov 2013 18:44:59 -0600
Okay guys I'm back and almost functional. Jeff I got a note back from our Director, mostly positive. He's okay with eliminating the baud limit but not sure what to do about the bandwidth issue, might
/archives//html/RTTY/2013-11/msg00238.html (12,184 bytes)

139. [RTTY] TU5AX (score: 1)
Author: "Ron Kolarik" <rkolarik@neb.rr.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2013 00:33:17 -0600
Just got them 7040 up 3. Starting to get stronger and I was at 70 watts. Ron K0IDT _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/ma
/archives//html/RTTY/2013-11/msg00265.html (6,169 bytes)

140. Re: [RTTY] Hints and tips on how to file comments on RM-11708 (score: 1)
Author: "Ron Kolarik" <rkolarik@neb.rr.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2013 20:04:01 -0600
Stan don't take this the wrong way but if the ARRL wants support from hams then they need to support us not work against us. Did they put it up to the membership or ham community at large before they
/archives//html/RTTY/2013-11/msg00287.html (10,165 bytes)

Current List: 121 - 140
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14]
This search system is powered by Namazu