Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:recordupe@verizon.net: 64 ]

Total 64 documents matching your query.

21. [RTTY] What to do about ARRL's Baud Rate Proposal (score: 1)
Author: Dave Barr <recordupe@verizon.net>
Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2013 08:39:48 -0500
I am gratified to see that most of the comments on this subject are calm and reasoned, and hope that terminology like "attack" will not be used in any effort to revise the ARRL's attempt to change pa
/archives//html/RTTY/2013-11/msg00110.html (7,453 bytes)

22. [RTTY] Filing by Consumer and Governmental Affairs Bureau in RM-11708 on 11/21/2013 (score: 1)
Author: Dave Barr <recordupe@verizon.net>
Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2013 08:31:55 -0500
Here is the link to the RM. http://apps.fcc.gov/ecfs/comment/view?id=6017477620 Dave, K2YG _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http://lists.contestin
/archives//html/RTTY/2013-11/msg00137.html (7,430 bytes)

23. [RTTY] What are the best K3 filters for digital use? (score: 1)
Author: Dave Barr <recordupe@verizon.net>
Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2013 11:01:45 -0500
Which two of the 200/250/400 and 500 filters are best for digital use, primarily RTTY contests and dx. I understand that for JT-65 and PSK the standard ssb filter, or even an AM filter is useable. I
/archives//html/RTTY/2013-11/msg00335.html (7,742 bytes)

24. Re: [RTTY] RTTY Digest, Vol 131, Issue 67 (score: 1)
Author: Dave Barr <recordupe@verizon.net>
Date: Sat, 30 Nov 2013 00:04:18 -0500
5 watt K2 power level set: CW: 4.41 watts on 20; 4.25 on 15; 3.95 on 10. RTTY: 4.37 on 20; 3.96 on 15; 3.61 on 10 with audio level above saturation. These figures are probably about as accurate as th
/archives//html/RTTY/2013-11/msg00372.html (10,748 bytes)

25. Re: [RTTY] RTTY Digest, Vol 131, Issue 67 (score: 1)
Author: Dave Barr <recordupe@verizon.net>
Date: Sat, 30 Nov 2013 00:07:51 -0500
Please ignore my recent post. Wrong address. Late at night. Dave, K2YG _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listin
/archives//html/RTTY/2013-11/msg00373.html (6,571 bytes)

26. [RTTY] Does ARRL Erratum Extend Comment Deadline? (score: 1)
Author: Dave Barr <recordupe@verizon.net>
Date: Mon, 02 Dec 2013 16:06:33 -0500
Does the erratum file by the ARRL on Nov 26th cause an extension of period for comments to December 26th? Dave, K2YG _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.
/archives//html/RTTY/2013-12/msg00002.html (6,505 bytes)

27. [RTTY] RM 11708 Comments (score: 1)
Author: Dave Barr <recordupe@verizon.net>
Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2013 21:17:00 -0500
It is rather depressing to see the number of positive comments on the FCC website. I looked at a number of the most recent listings, and saw no negative comments. Guess it's going to go through. 73 D
/archives//html/RTTY/2013-12/msg00128.html (7,002 bytes)

28. Re: [RTTY] FREQUENCY IN USE BY ... (JT65/JT9) (score: 1)
Author: Dave Barr <recordupe@verizon.net>
Date: Mon, 06 Jan 2014 11:05:32 -0500
I thought the JT65/JT9 customary segment on 20 meters was 14076-14080, so the complaint sounds a bit disingenuous. At any rate, if you could hear neither side of a qso at the qrg you were on, you can
/archives//html/RTTY/2014-01/msg00037.html (8,618 bytes)

29. Re: [RTTY] RTTY RM 11708 in ARRL BOD (score: 1)
Author: Dave Barr <recordupe@verizon.net>
Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2014 14:33:38 -0500
Here's item 51 (with my underlining): WHEREAS the Board of Directors has received *_inquiries_**concerning RM -11708 (the symbol rate petition); and WHEREAS it is imperative that the Board of Directo
/archives//html/RTTY/2014-01/msg00328.html (9,416 bytes)

30. Re: [RTTY] [RTTY} DX Pile ups (score: 1)
Author: Dave Barr <recordupe@verizon.net>
Date: Wed, 05 Feb 2014 16:39:17 -0500
Dick, it is most important to keep playing the game. Getting the qso is the icing. And, I hope I'll still be playing if I get to 87. 73 Dave, K2YG, 72 On 2/5/2014 12:47 PM, rtty-request@contesting.co
/archives//html/RTTY/2014-02/msg00131.html (8,929 bytes)

31. [RTTY] Data sub-mode switching on K3 (score: 1)
Author: Dave Barr <recordupe@verizon.net>
Date: Wed, 02 Apr 2014 17:55:11 -0400
Sometimes I want to monitor RTTY while I am operating JT65/9 on my K3 (sn7901) which has the sub-rx. The only way I have figured out to do this is to set both vfo A and B with [A>B] to data sub-mode
/archives//html/RTTY/2014-04/msg00016.html (7,101 bytes)

32. Re: [RTTY] RTTY Digest, Vol 142, Issue 32 (score: 1)
Author: Dave Barr <recordupe@verizon.net>
Date: Sun, 26 Oct 2014 23:55:06 -0400
When I go to the submitted log list (as directed in the link below) I see nothing but an empty grid. What am I doing wrong? Dave, K2YG On 10/24/2014 12:00 PM, rtty-request@contesting.com wrote: Messa
/archives//html/RTTY/2014-10/msg00189.html (7,249 bytes)

33. Re: [RTTY] RTTY Digest, Vol 142, Issue 36 (score: 1)
Author: Dave Barr <recordupe@verizon.net>
Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2014 13:13:14 -0400
Thanks everyone for letting me know I am listed on the JARTS logs received page. When I access the url everyone is mentioning, I see only about a ten line 2 column empty grid. I am using Firefox 30.0
/archives//html/RTTY/2014-10/msg00194.html (8,450 bytes)

34. Re: [RTTY] CONFIG:AFSK TX = FIL on K3 (score: 1)
Author: Dave Barr <recordupe@verizon.net>
Date: Tue, 02 Dec 2014 12:47:59 -0500
Is this filter in the audio tx path, affecting AFSK tones generated by a computer sound card, or is it only in the internally generated RTTY capability of the K3? 73, Dave K2YG == On 12/2/2014 6:59 A
/archives//html/RTTY/2014-12/msg00011.html (7,524 bytes)

35. [RTTY] Odd RTTY like signal on 7047 khz (score: 1)
Author: Dave Barr <recordupe@verizon.net>
Date: Sat, 06 Dec 2014 17:34:32 -0500
Has anyone heard or does any one recognize the digital signal that has been appearing at about 7047khz in the early evening, today qrming some TARA contester. Transmissions are of comparatively long
/archives//html/RTTY/2014-12/msg00025.html (6,702 bytes)

36. [RTTY] Contest QRMing of other digimodes (score: 1)
Author: Dave Barr <recordupe@verizon.net>
Date: Wed, 07 Jan 2015 16:17:11 -0500
I support Ed's statement regarding LID comments from v145/19. In regard to qrm to other digital modes during contests: During over 25 years of RTTY contesting, I have never seen the rtty sub-bands wi
/archives//html/RTTY/2015-01/msg00136.html (7,467 bytes)

37. [RTTY] Leading Zeros in N1MM (score: 1)
Author: Dave Barr <recordupe@verizon.net>
Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2015 15:30:45 -0500
Hi Glenn From the menu line in the call entry window of N1MM (I am still using classic), click <Config>, then <Control Ports, Mode Control, Audio...>; next, the Function Keys tab. Check the box in th
/archives//html/RTTY/2015-02/msg00056.html (7,168 bytes)

38. Re: [RTTY] CQ at the end and skimmers (score: 1)
Author: Dave Barr <recordupe@verizon.net>
Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2015 20:22:27 -0500
A cq after a call sign calling cq is good. But for the rest of it: what happened to radio; what happened to a little wrist and finger work on the knob, and a bit of brain work? Is this radio or inter
/archives//html/RTTY/2015-02/msg00113.html (7,124 bytes)

39. Re: [RTTY] RTTY Digest, Vol 146, Issue 21 (score: 1)
Author: Dave Barr <recordupe@verizon.net>
Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2015 20:51:47 -0500
The reason nobody sends CQ at the end of a CQ transmission in a CW contest is because the stations working the CQer don't send their call in their exchange transmission, hence no confusion as to who
/archives//html/RTTY/2015-02/msg00115.html (7,928 bytes)

40. [RTTY] TS-450 Power Rating (score: 1)
Author: Dave Barr <recordupe@verizon.net>
Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2015 11:19:24 -0500
On 2/26/2015 5:43 PM, rtty-request@contesting.com wrote: It would just be nice not to have to crank my TS-450 down and only run 40 watts when doing a RTTY contest. Yeah, I know, I know, 'buy a better
/archives//html/RTTY/2015-02/msg00198.html (7,046 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu