- 1. Re: [RTTY] ST0R rtty and rtty calling (score: 1)
- Author: Dave Barr <recordupe@verizon.net>
- Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2011 16:24:38 -0400
- I think the thing to be grateful for in re ST0R is that as far as I could tell, they had a station on rtty all the time. I don't think any first time new entity dxpedition has ever done that. And I w
- /archives//html/RTTY/2011-08/msg00168.html (7,043 bytes)
- 2. [RTTY] RTTY vs Digital DXCC (score: 1)
- Author: Dave Barr <recordupe@verizon.net>
- Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2011 09:54:46 -0400
- Come on guys. The accomplishment is the same whether the name on the DXCC certificate is RTTY or Digital. Just because some of us have the former doesn't mean we made all the q's on RTTY. When you ge
- /archives//html/RTTY/2011-08/msg00210.html (6,692 bytes)
- 3. [RTTY] RTTY RU Exchange Complaints (score: 1)
- Author: Dave Barr <recordupe@verizon.net>
- Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2012 18:25:00 -0500
- What bothers me more often than dropped last letters or extra noise generated characters when no space is sent after the call sign is the relatively high number of participants who send 3 or 4 or mor
- /archives//html/RTTY/2012-01/msg00056.html (7,235 bytes)
- 4. [RTTY] Exchanges and qrp. (score: 1)
- Author: Dave Barr <recordupe@verizon.net>
- Date: Sun, 15 Jan 2012 13:11:42 -0500
- I have been running QRP in RTTY contests, almost always S&P, for more than ten years. Requests for repeats are infrequent on 20 thru 10 meters, and surprisingly few on 40 and 80. I usually send the e
- /archives//html/RTTY/2012-01/msg00171.html (8,630 bytes)
- 5. [RTTY] HK0NA - is there no SSB/CW (score: 1)
- Author: Dave Barr <recordupe@verizon.net>
- Date: Fri, 03 Feb 2012 16:09:25 -0500
- At 2100z Friday (2/3) HK0NA was running RTTY on 14080, 18100.1, and 21081.6 simultaneously. Is this a first ever for a dxpedition? Is someone running SO3R, or are they just trying the ultimate "spead
- /archives//html/RTTY/2012-02/msg00057.html (7,008 bytes)
- 6. Re: [RTTY] 3 stations on rtty at one time (score: 1)
- Author: Dave Barr <recordupe@verizon.net>
- Date: Sun, 05 Feb 2012 16:53:30 -0500
- Actually, John, I made a poor choice of subject line. My tongue in cheek reference to "no CW/SSB" was simply admiration of the good treatment of the RTTY community. I was just reporting that I could
- /archives//html/RTTY/2012-02/msg00076.html (8,600 bytes)
- 7. Re: [RTTY] RTTY Digest, Vol 110, Issue 22 (score: 1)
- Author: Dave Barr <recordupe@verizon.net>
- Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2012 13:21:26 -0500
- Paul Gutsy; QRP and a small loop antenna. I fully agree with your suggestion for qrp catagories in the Roundup and the CQWW RTTY, and others too! Whose arms do we twist? 73, Dave, K2YG -- Original me
- /archives//html/RTTY/2012-02/msg00153.html (7,991 bytes)
- 8. Re: [RTTY] RTTY Digest, Vol 110, Issue 28 (score: 1)
- Author: Dave Barr <recordupe@verizon.net>
- Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2012 11:33:24 -0500
- Dick, I'm sorry I didn't work you in the WPX to see if my exchange was received ok on the first try. I have been running qrp in rtty contests for 12 years or so, and normally I get less than 5% repea
- /archives//html/RTTY/2012-02/msg00220.html (9,134 bytes)
- 9. Re: [RTTY] 9M0L 18103 up (score: 1)
- Author: Dave Barr <recordupe@verizon.net>
- Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2012 22:26:22 -0400
- One of the major reasons that stations keep calling a DXpedition station after they've called some else is simply the length of the DXpedition's transmission, which is usually CALLSIGN 599 CALLSIGN.
- /archives//html/RTTY/2012-04/msg00141.html (8,642 bytes)
- 10. [RTTY] French overseas prefixes (score: 1)
- Author: Dave Barr <recordupe@verizon.net>
- Date: Fri, 25 May 2012 20:58:59 -0400
- The new calls in the country files reminded me to complain. What is with the French that they can't continue prefixes that designate individual colonial entities. Just another example of governments
- /archives//html/RTTY/2012-05/msg00290.html (6,463 bytes)
- 11. Re: [RTTY] RTTY Digest, Vol 113, Issue 45 (score: 1)
- Author: Dave Barr <recordupe@verizon.net>
- Date: Sat, 26 May 2012 20:29:51 -0400
- Jeff, I agree that the USA confuses things just as badly as anyone else. My point is that there was a good system in effect, allowing anyone to instantly know to which DX entity a station belonged. B
- /archives//html/RTTY/2012-05/msg00292.html (8,191 bytes)
- 12. Re: [RTTY] Feld Day Invite (score: 1)
- Author: Dave Barr <recordupe@verizon.net>
- Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2012 01:55:11 -0400
- Too far to visit, but applaud the effort. Let's all push for more FD activity on RTTY. I realize it is tough in some cases to get digital time, but be rude and push. Dave, K2YG ______________________
- /archives//html/RTTY/2012-06/msg00054.html (9,737 bytes)
- 13. Re: [RTTY] Question marks (score: 1)
- Author: Dave Barr <recordupe@verizon.net>
- Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2012 23:35:20 -0400
- For some time now, I have received Bill's messages with question marks where spaces should be. Thus they are readable, but not what they should be. Dave/K2YG _________________________________________
- /archives//html/RTTY/2012-06/msg00087.html (7,438 bytes)
- 14. Re: [RTTY] B4 (score: 1)
- Author: Dave Barr <recordupe@verizon.net>
- Date: Mon, 01 Oct 2012 11:48:08 -0400
- When someone tells me I am a dupe and my N1MM disagrees, I have a macro ready: <You are not in my log on this band. Please work me again.> On the few occasions that I have to use that, no one has ref
- /archives//html/RTTY/2012-10/msg00011.html (6,745 bytes)
- 15. [RTTY] Short Makrothen Score Report (score: 1)
- Author: Dave Barr <recordupe@verizon.net>
- Date: Sun, 14 Oct 2012 16:27:36 -0400
- At risk of offending "3830 only" supporters: Makrothen contest summary: 117 q's 517060 points 1 watt 73, Dave, K2YG _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.c
- /archives//html/RTTY/2012-10/msg00151.html (6,281 bytes)
- 16. Re: [RTTY] RTTY Digest, Vol 122, Issue 70 (score: 1)
- Author: Dave Barr <recordupe@verizon.net>
- Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2013 12:08:30 -0500
- Older than that, but spelled differently (from Wikipedia) Farfel the Dog was a ventriloquist's <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ventriloquism#Ventriloquist.27s_dummy>hound dog <http://en.wikipedia.org/w
- /archives//html/RTTY/2013-02/msg00483.html (7,867 bytes)
- 17. [RTTY] Field Day Digital (score: 1)
- Author: Dave Barr <recordupe@verizon.net>
- Date: Fri, 05 Jul 2013 14:35:54 -0400
- I am not surprised that PSK affords more activity on Field Day than RTTY. As mentioned, it is just much simpler to train digitally inexperienced hams to punch a couple of buttons and make some Qs, wi
- /archives//html/RTTY/2013-07/msg00025.html (6,995 bytes)
- 18. [RTTY] The /qrp thing (score: 1)
- Author: Dave Barr <recordupe@verizon.net>
- Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2013 16:22:03 -0400
- I agree with Tom - never use "/qrp", although in minor non-contest pileups it might work to get the attention of a soft-hearted op in ssb or cw. Other than when chasing a RTTY new one, I have been ru
- /archives//html/RTTY/2013-09/msg00191.html (8,736 bytes)
- 19. Re: [RTTY] Courtesy (score: 1)
- Author: Dave Barr <recordupe@verizon.net>
- Date: Tue, 01 Oct 2013 12:29:55 -0400
- Having worked RTTY for more than 25 years I thought the use of TU in addition to being Thank You was also the equivalent of QSL, as in, when S&Ping, responding to the running station's exchange by se
- /archives//html/RTTY/2013-10/msg00010.html (8,200 bytes)
- 20. [RTTY] Frequency Usage (score: 1)
- Author: Dave Barr <recordupe@verizon.net>
- Date: Fri, 04 Oct 2013 12:43:19 -0400
- I think we are missing a statistic in this which shows how popular RTTY contesting has become. The contest use above 21.100 in certainly increasing (as on 20 and 10), but the width of the used band s
- /archives//html/RTTY/2013-10/msg00115.html (6,942 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu