Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:plaws0@gmail.com: 353 ]

Total 353 documents matching your query.

81. Re: [RTTY] QSL'ing (score: 1)
Author: Peter Laws <plaws0@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2006 12:36:00 -0600
If I got 50 cards a week, or maybe even half that, and they were all post cards, I might get annoyed ... But I'd also make sure that my qrz.com entry (and other places) said "SASE ONLY". If you want
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-01/msg00633.html (8,321 bytes)

82. Re: [RTTY] thats very sad Gert (score: 1)
Author: Peter Laws <plaws0@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2006 13:37:06 -0600
You're confusing "ultimate control" and micromanaging. The ARRL Board doesn't need to use LoTW to judge its effectiveness (tho' it certainly wouldn't hurt) any more than the board of the company I wo
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-01/msg00634.html (9,116 bytes)

83. Re: [RTTY] Missing contact (score: 1)
Author: Peter Laws <plaws0@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2006 09:07:37 -0600
Is a /MM station valid in the Sprint? I've seen some contest rules that specifically exclude aero- and maritime-mobile stations ... -- Peter Laws | N5UWY/9 | plaws0 gmail | Travel by Train! "They tha
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-01/msg00690.html (7,497 bytes)

84. Re: [RTTY] External DSP devices (score: 1)
Author: Peter Laws <plaws0@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2006 09:33:14 -0600
I came to the same conclusion 2 years ago. I had (well, still have) an Icom IC-725 that I used for a half-dozen or more contests back in '04 when I got back on the air seriously. I did OK with *no* f
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-01/msg00693.html (7,912 bytes)

85. Re: [RTTY] Tips for contesting... (score: 1)
Author: Peter Laws <plaws0@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2006 09:54:29 -0600
Interesting comment. I'm a 100W+dipole station (and a dipole at about 5 m at the east end at that!) and while I've called CQ a few times, I always stop because, ta da!, I don't feel busy. I'll try to
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-01/msg00695.html (7,967 bytes)

86. [RTTY] AGC: on or off? (score: 1)
Author: Peter Laws <plaws0@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2006 19:26:34 -0600
I keep seeing mention of AGC. That's the one control on my IC-746Pro I admit to not knowing how to set. I've read the Handbook section on AGC and the manual entry and, of course, fiddled with it ...
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-01/msg00710.html (6,623 bytes)

87. Re: [RTTY] AGC: on or off? (score: 1)
Author: Peter Laws <plaws0@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2006 18:29:08 -0600
But the 746Pro does, which is why I'm glad I eBayed that one and not its predecessor! Thanks to all for the great replies - I'll work with it during the XE test this weekend! -- Peter Laws | N5UWY/9
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-01/msg00731.html (7,904 bytes)

88. Re: [RTTY] What is MINIRTTY? (score: 1)
Author: Peter Laws <plaws0@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 3 Feb 2006 10:54:29 -0600
Assuming those of us who posted comments against the ARRL's proposal to allow email robots to take over the phone bands ... um, I mean, "regulate by bandwidth" ... do NOT prevail, then 23 Hz-shift RT
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-02/msg00032.html (7,969 bytes)

89. Re: [RTTY] 3Y0X says RTTY tomorrow (score: 1)
Author: Peter Laws <plaws0@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 12 Feb 2006 22:24:49 -0600
I just worked them on 20m SSB at 2200 CST ... Only guys on the band. Spent all weekend chasing them instead of working in WPX. Did manage to pick up two other new ones, though, so I'm happy. At this
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-02/msg00142.html (7,834 bytes)

90. Re: [RTTY] The RTTY 160 Meter contest (score: 1)
Author: "Peter Laws" <plaws0@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 2 Mar 2006 18:25:54 -0600
What do you use for an antenna? -- Peter Laws | N5UWY/9 | plaws0 gmail | Travel by Train! "They that can give up essential Liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safe
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-03/msg00039.html (7,149 bytes)

91. Re: [RTTY] MixW on RTTY (score: 1)
Author: "Peter Laws" <plaws0@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 4 Mar 2006 13:42:24 -0600
MMTTY has no problem with FSK. You just need to tell it how to key on the Misc tab of the setup screen (assumes you have the HW necessary to do the keying!). -- Peter Laws | N5UWY/9 | plaws0 gmail |
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-03/msg00078.html (8,439 bytes)

92. Re: [RTTY] MixW on RTTY (score: 1)
Author: "Peter Laws" <plaws0@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 4 Mar 2006 16:05:16 -0600
That's too bad. MMTTY has a "RTTY engine" that *can* be used by other programs. N1MM's Logger integrates MMTTY quite nicely and is also available at no charge (like MMTTY). -- Peter Laws | N5UWY/9 |
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-03/msg00085.html (7,416 bytes)

93. Re: [RTTY] Quiet PC power supply? (score: 1)
Author: "Peter Laws" <plaws0@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 11 Mar 2006 16:46:06 -0600
Assume you mean for the radio. I am happy with my Alinco DM-330MV. It did have one spur near 720 kHz, which is a problem in baseball season (WGN). No problem - the PS has a knob that allows you to sh
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-03/msg00181.html (7,646 bytes)

94. Re: [RTTY] WAS RTTY (score: 1)
Author: "Peter Laws" <plaws0@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 25 May 2006 09:35:16 -0500
IMO, the League could do a little better job with the WAS award certificates, especially the specialty awards. I'm biased because I don't care for the "portrait" orientation, but beyond that, the com
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-05/msg00172.html (7,467 bytes)

95. Re: [RTTY] RTTY is getting lower and lower in frequency on 20 (score: 1)
Author: "Peter Laws" <plaws0@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 11 Feb 2007 20:20:45 -0600
No kiddin'. The CW folks act as if their best friend was killed. Geez, they can already use CW on every single stinkin' band (in the US, save for 60 m and the 219-220 band), yet they complain about e
/archives//html/RTTY/2007-02/msg00125.html (9,107 bytes)

96. Re: [RTTY] WPX contest (score: 1)
Author: "Peter Laws" <plaws0@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2007 16:42:52 -0600
It doesn't. Log the Q and the next one up has the next higher number. If it didn't ... what would be the point? -- Peter Laws | N5UWY | plaws0 gmail | Travel by Train! "They that can give up essentia
/archives//html/RTTY/2007-02/msg00159.html (6,957 bytes)

97. Re: [RTTY] Callsign confusion (Eh-Eee Who?) (score: 1)
Author: "Peter Laws" <plaws0@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2007 13:34:43 -0600
Likewise, N5UW has many credits in LoTW that won't match up with anything. I've probably got a bunch in there that don't match up either, but I don't play LoTW yet. N9UWY probably has a lot of credit
/archives//html/RTTY/2007-02/msg00194.html (7,701 bytes)

98. Re: [RTTY] Callsign confusion (Eh-Eee Who?) (score: 1)
Author: "Peter Laws" <plaws0@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2007 20:34:04 -0600
You are probably correct. Can one request that one's call be taken out of the cheat file that's passed around? -- Peter Laws | N5UWY | plaws0 gmail | Travel by Train! "They that can give up essential
/archives//html/RTTY/2007-02/msg00225.html (7,720 bytes)

99. Re: [RTTY] 2006 CQWW RTTY WPX Results (score: 1)
Author: "Peter Laws" <plaws0@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2007 20:17:20 -0600
I, too, noticed that CQ, like QST before it, is now only catering to the contesting elite while ignoring the hundreds of others that put the elite "in the box" in the first place. Quite rude, IMHO. T
/archives//html/RTTY/2007-02/msg00270.html (7,978 bytes)

100. Re: [RTTY] Fw: RTTY presentation to radio club... (score: 1)
Author: "Peter Laws" <plaws0@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 25 Feb 2007 14:21:28 -0600
How about this for perspective: Have a running Model 28 in the room as folks arrive and then tell them that it's all been replaced by "This!" and pull the sheet back on a laptop running MMTTY. Failin
/archives//html/RTTY/2007-02/msg00403.html (7,753 bytes)

Current List: 81 - 100
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] [17] [18]
This search system is powered by Namazu