Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:plaws0@gmail.com: 353 ]

Total 353 documents matching your query.

61. Re: [RTTY] Sending DE before a callsign (score: 1)
Author: Peter Laws <plaws0@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 1 Jan 2006 11:00:39 -0600
To me, this seems to be more dare I say it, ethical :-), than using a look-up table. It also catches callsigns that are not in the databases. -- Peter Laws | N5UWY/9 | plaws0 gmail | Travel by Train!
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-01/msg00007.html (7,078 bytes)

62. Re: [RTTY] Total RTTY newbie needs help! (score: 1)
Author: Peter Laws <plaws0@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 6 Jan 2006 17:40:10 -0600
Step 1: http://www.aa5au.com/ Should be plenty of RTTY signals this weekend ... :-) -- Peter Laws | N5UWY/9 | plaws0 gmail | Travel by Train! "They that can give up essential Liberty to obtain a litt
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-01/msg00061.html (7,160 bytes)

63. Re: [RTTY] ARRL RTTY Roundup Practice - Friday,January 6 (Pacific local) (score: 1)
Author: Peter Laws <plaws0@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 6 Jan 2006 21:32:11 -0600
TNX to NCCC for doing this. Good shakedown run. Band QSOsPts Sta Cty 3.5 17 17 11 1 7 6 6 4 0 Total 23 23 15 1 Score : 368 -- Peter Laws | N5UWY/9 | plaws0 gmail | Travel by Train! "They that can giv
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-01/msg00064.html (7,558 bytes)

64. [RTTY] Fwd: RTTY Roundup N5UWY/9 Single Op LP (score: 1)
Author: Peter Laws <plaws0@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 8 Jan 2006 21:20:51 -0600
(when I posted via the 3830 web form, I put /8 ... oops) ARRL RTTY Roundup Call: N5UWY/9 Operator(s): N5UWY Station: N5UWY Class: Single Op LP QTH: Lombard, IL Operating Time (hrs): 21.33 Summary: Ba
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-01/msg00101.html (7,480 bytes)

65. Re: [RTTY] dashes be gone (score: 1)
Author: Peter Laws <plaws0@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2006 08:53:30 -0600
Not a pro by any means, but I plan to do the same next contest for the same reasons. I *assume* the other station can't hear me well and put in some "forward error checking" ... but that's not always
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-01/msg00118.html (7,980 bytes)

66. Re: [RTTY] N2KI Round Up (score: 1)
Author: Peter Laws <plaws0@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2006 09:04:30 -0600
I saw a few stations that clearly had the MMTTY "NET" setting, or equivalent, enabled and were sliding up and down the band on every transmission. Yuck! Hardly whining. Folks are trying to convey the
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-01/msg00120.html (7,915 bytes)

67. Re: [RTTY] Fwd: RTTY Roundup N5UWY/9 Single Op LP (score: 1)
Author: Peter Laws <plaws0@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2006 09:24:14 -0600
So many variables changed from the time I operated the Radio PC in a RTTY contest without issue and when I started having problems, that I don't know which was the culprit. I *do* know that I couldn'
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-01/msg00123.html (8,495 bytes)

68. Re: [RTTY] State exchanges in RU (score: 1)
Author: Peter Laws <plaws0@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2006 10:01:51 -0600
YES! What's up with that? My call is CONSTANTLY munged, most commonly as N5UW/9, N5UQY/9, or just N5UWY. Got so bad that I made a macro: "PSE FIX MY CALL -- N5UWY/9 N5UWY/9". Most folks somehow ackno
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-01/msg00128.html (7,799 bytes)

69. Re: [RTTY] RTTY Best Practices (score: 1)
Author: Peter Laws <plaws0@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 15 Jan 2006 12:24:31 -0600
Thank you for validating my use of odd numbers of critical elements, i.e. "IL IL IL". -- Peter Laws | N5UWY/9 | plaws0 gmail | Travel by Train! "They that can give up essential Liberty to obtain a li
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-01/msg00341.html (9,160 bytes)

70. Re: [RTTY] RTTY Best Practices (score: 1)
Author: Peter Laws <plaws0@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 15 Jan 2006 13:27:01 -0600
If you copy "IL IN", you can't be certain where I am. If, OTOH, you copy "IL IN IL", you can be *reasonably*, but not 100%, certain that I'm in Illinois. -- Peter Laws | N5UWY/9 | plaws0 gmail | Trav
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-01/msg00349.html (9,596 bytes)

71. Re: [RTTY] ARRL Bandwidth Proposal - FCC Invites Comments (score: 1)
Author: Peter Laws <plaws0@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 15 Jan 2006 15:12:22 -0600
Because there is a difference. Just because a protocol is published doesn't mean it is free to use. The publisher retains the copyright and can license its use in whatever form he wants. Absolutely t
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-01/msg00363.html (10,281 bytes)

72. Re: [RTTY] ARRL Bandwidth Proposal - FCC Invites Comments (score: 1)
Author: Peter Laws <plaws0@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 15 Jan 2006 15:27:33 -0600
It gets better, Joe. Check out Minute 5 of this recent ARRL Exec Comm meeting: http://www.arrl.org/announce/ec_minutes_478.html - The ARRL want to *explicitly* allow encryption, albeit above 50 MHz!
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-01/msg00365.html (11,084 bytes)

73. Re: [RTTY] RTTY Best Practices (score: 1)
Author: Peter Laws <plaws0@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2006 11:54:31 -0600
3 is the shortest odd number (not counting 1). Sending 5 every time would be a waste, especially when folks can copy me well. I have another macro with various exchanges (state, name, zone) repeated
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-01/msg00384.html (9,552 bytes)

74. Re: [RTTY] uh, what about spectrum? (score: 1)
Author: Peter Laws <plaws0@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2006 12:13:58 -0600
So if we changed shift to 125 Hz, assuming that still allows 45.45 Baud, we'd be able to transmit right to the bottom of the band, right? -- Peter Laws | N5UWY/9 | plaws0 gmail | Travel by Train! "Th
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-01/msg00385.html (7,780 bytes)

75. Re: [RTTY] uh, what about spectrum? (score: 1)
Author: Peter Laws <plaws0@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2006 14:04:22 -0600
No, it does not: "The petition recommends what the ARRL calls 'a shift in regulatory philosophy' to encourage and enable development and refinement of digital techniques and advanced technologies." I
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-01/msg00394.html (8,723 bytes)

76. Re: [RTTY] what setting to ft100mp user settings for 23hz shift (score: 1)
Author: Peter Laws <plaws0@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2006 10:30:28 -0600
Any idea if this is possible on the Icom IC-746Pro (IC-7400)? Looking at the instructions, I don't see anything that would allow it ... -- Peter Laws | N5UWY/9 | plaws0 gmail | Travel by Train! "They
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-01/msg00433.html (7,591 bytes)

77. Re: [RTTY] rtty laptops (score: 1)
Author: Peter Laws <plaws0@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2006 20:13:23 -0600
I had good results with a Fujitsu Lifebook B-2131. Tiny thing, only a 10" screen, but it's a touch screen and if you get the "port replicator", you get a real DB9 COM port. P2-400 with W98SE, though
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-01/msg00477.html (7,940 bytes)

78. Re: [RTTY] UBN reports (score: 1)
Author: Peter Laws <plaws0@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2006 13:06:19 -0600
Along the same lines, how do you get to the CQ WW DX UBNs at cqww.com? Mail to the "questions" address have gone unanswered (tho' I admit that I haven't tried *lately*). -- Peter Laws | N5UWY/9 | pla
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-01/msg00528.html (6,963 bytes)

79. Re: [RTTY] UBN reports (score: 1)
Author: Peter Laws <plaws0@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2006 16:12:44 -0600
questions@cqww.com *does* work -- I tried it again -- and we're working on passwords for past SSB UBNs. I didn't see RTTY either. -- Peter Laws | N5UWY/9 | plaws0 gmail | Travel by Train! "They that
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-01/msg00534.html (7,437 bytes)

80. Re: [RTTY] thats very sad Gert (score: 1)
Author: Peter Laws <plaws0@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2006 12:48:45 -0600
You're confusing two groups of individuals. ARRL members vote for Section Managers and Division Directors and Vice-Directors. The Board of Directors then decides who will be President/VP, etc (much l
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-01/msg00588.html (9,138 bytes)

Current List: 61 - 80
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] [17] [18]
This search system is powered by Namazu