Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:plaws0@gmail.com: 353 ]

Total 353 documents matching your query.

321. Re: [RTTY] SK is bad? (score: 1)
Author: Peter Laws <plaws0@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2016 21:03:30 -0500
Wasn't there a Yaesu several years ago that had an "FSK" position and input that was actually a tone generator? -- Peter Laws | N5UWY | plaws plaws net | Travel by Train! ____________________________
/archives//html/RTTY/2016-10/msg00357.html (7,369 bytes)

322. Re: [RTTY] BARTG rule changes (score: 1)
Author: Peter Laws <plaws0@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2016 12:16:22 -0600
The whining has commenced! I will send my occasional reminder that in no jurisdiction with which I am familiar (certainly not under the US FCC, at least until its abolishment) are radioamateurs *requ
/archives//html/RTTY/2016-11/msg00162.html (8,207 bytes)

323. Re: [RTTY] RM-11708 (score: 1)
Author: Peter Laws <plaws0@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 26 Nov 2016 10:56:06 -0600
1200 bauds on the 10-m band. If all your friends jumped off the bridge, would you jump too? Dumb argument. If you are going to argue in favor of something, argue on its merits, not that "everyone els
/archives//html/RTTY/2016-11/msg00171.html (7,650 bytes)

324. Re: [RTTY] RM-11708 (score: 1)
Author: Peter Laws <plaws0@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 26 Nov 2016 14:27:31 -0600
Well, that's probably true. No sense in rewriting rules that will never take effect. -- Peter Laws | N5UWY | plaws plaws net | Travel by Train! _______________________________________________ RTTY ma
/archives//html/RTTY/2016-11/msg00173.html (6,988 bytes)

325. Re: [RTTY] Upside-down RTTY contest QSO's (score: 1)
Author: Peter Laws <plaws0@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2017 11:45:23 -0600
Sure. Don't work them. If enough people just ignore them, they'll (hopefully) realize that their technique is lacking. -- Peter Laws | N5UWY | plaws plaws net | Travel by Train! _____________________
/archives//html/RTTY/2017-02/msg00092.html (7,428 bytes)

326. Re: [RTTY] Upside-down RTTY contest QSO's (score: 1)
Author: Peter Laws <plaws0@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2017 14:20:51 -0600
Yeah ... we need to work on sponsors to ditch that. Put in something else. Shoe size or something. BARTG is half-way there. :-) -- Peter Laws | N5UWY | plaws plaws net | Travel by Train! ____________
/archives//html/RTTY/2017-02/msg00099.html (8,938 bytes)

327. Re: [RTTY] Welcome Back Ray WF1B (score: 1)
Author: Peter Laws <plaws0@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2017 15:12:07 -0500
After futzing with PC-PACKRATT and paper back in the 90s at W5YM, we updated to the Cadillac of programs, RTTY by WF1B. Excellent software! Thanks, Ray! -- Peter Laws | N5UWY | plaws plaws net | Trav
/archives//html/RTTY/2017-04/msg00041.html (8,822 bytes)

328. Re: [RTTY] MMTTY 1.70K (score: 1)
Author: Peter Laws <plaws0@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 5 Jun 2017 09:24:03 -0500
My experience with MMTTY is that updates don't break things so, when I am not dealing with DMR repeaters and "codeplugs" (Romulan for config file) and I have some time, I will update my three instanc
/archives//html/RTTY/2017-06/msg00009.html (8,886 bytes)

329. Re: [RTTY] Question for old timers (score: 1)
Author: Peter Laws <plaws0@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 26 Aug 2017 22:14:00 -0400
Good question. It always bugged me that the MIT club station would use "09" as the check in the ARRL November Sweepstakes. Like the contest you mention, it's supposed to be the "last two digits of th
/archives//html/RTTY/2017-08/msg00024.html (7,786 bytes)

330. Re: [RTTY] New Radio (score: 1)
Author: Peter Laws <plaws0@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2017 10:14:34 -0500
The ad for the IC-7610, which appears to be the 7300's big bro, specifically claims an RX input. -- Peter Laws | N5UWY | plaws plaws net | Travel by Train! ___________________________________________
/archives//html/RTTY/2017-09/msg00076.html (8,592 bytes)

331. [RTTY] Intel NUC, anyone? (score: 1)
Author: Peter Laws <plaws0@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2017 15:40:07 -0500
I've been dancing around replacing the PC at N5UWY (2006 Dell Precision 670 with a Xeon or two - I forget - and 16 GB RAM) for quite some time now but have now been introduced to Intel's little NUC b
/archives//html/RTTY/2017-09/msg00104.html (7,469 bytes)

332. Re: [RTTY] Intel NUC, anyone? (score: 1)
Author: Peter Laws <plaws0@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2017 16:53:31 -0500
That would be an issue if I had a USB-equipped Icom which I do not. I covet an "I-Line" of IC-7300, IC-R8600, and IC-9700, but that ain't happening, so ... :-) -- Peter Laws | N5UWY | plaws plaws net
/archives//html/RTTY/2017-09/msg00107.html (7,365 bytes)

333. Re: [RTTY] Intel NUC, anyone? (score: 1)
Author: Peter Laws <plaws0@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 1 Oct 2017 12:09:26 -0500
The other question regarding power is how well do they do on 13.8 V dc? They claim to run on "12-19 V dc" but do they run as well at 13.8 as they do at 19? -- Peter Laws | N5UWY | plaws plaws net | T
/archives//html/RTTY/2017-10/msg00004.html (7,944 bytes)

334. [RTTY] FCC Grants Temporary Waiver to Permit Higher Symbol Rate Data Transmissions (score: 1)
Author: Peter Laws <plaws0@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 5 Oct 2017 15:48:21 -0500
http://www.arrl.org/news/fcc-grants-temporary-waiver-to-permit-higher-symbol-rate-data-transmissions I still think PacTor 3/4 should be unacceptable on the amateur band *and* I note there is nothing
/archives//html/RTTY/2017-10/msg00017.html (7,659 bytes)

335. Re: [RTTY] FCC Grants Temporary Waiver to Permit Higher Symbol Rate Data Transmissions (score: 1)
Author: Peter Laws <plaws0@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 5 Oct 2017 16:11:04 -0500
Someone will need to verify that the waived rules don't involve the automatic/unattended stuff ... http://transition.fcc.gov/Daily_Releases/Daily_Business/2017/db1005/DA-17-974A1.pdf -- Peter Laws |
/archives//html/RTTY/2017-10/msg00018.html (7,770 bytes)

336. [RTTY] Audio isolation (score: 1)
Author: Peter Laws <plaws0@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2017 21:12:22 -0500
I have a second radio I want to connect to my new NUC. Sound device will be USB. Don't care to spend more money on a second interface (I already have a RigBlaster). Since it's an Icom and will allow
/archives//html/RTTY/2017-10/msg00056.html (7,088 bytes)

337. Re: [RTTY] Intel NUC, anyone? (score: 1)
Author: Peter Laws <plaws0@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2017 21:31:02 -0500
So I ended up getting a tall i3 and a 16-GB SODIMM (leaving me a slot for another one just like it down the road). The 40-GB 2.5" SSD I had turned out to be ... not really big enough for W10. Yes, I
/archives//html/RTTY/2017-10/msg00077.html (11,979 bytes)

338. Re: [RTTY] Intel NUC, anyone? (score: 1)
Author: Peter Laws <plaws0@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2017 14:05:37 -0500
No RS-232 headers, either, in a NUC, which I was secretly hoping for. I did also look at the jitter info Oba-san has on his site referring to EXTFSK64. So USB -> RS-232 -> FSK radio port isn't the be
/archives//html/RTTY/2017-10/msg00080.html (9,179 bytes)

339. Re: [RTTY] Intel NUC, anyone? (score: 1)
Author: Peter Laws <plaws0@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2017 14:56:48 -0500
Why do some hams use a straight key for CW? A there are any number of keyers and interfaces that can produce perfectly timed CW using a keyboard for input. Still looking for the answer for commercial
/archives//html/RTTY/2017-10/msg00082.html (9,181 bytes)

340. Re: [RTTY] Intel NUC, anyone? (score: 1)
Author: Peter Laws <plaws0@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2017 10:33:36 -0500
Seen it go by here many time ... and never looked into it. An Arduino nano board is, like, $12. I think this is where I will go for FSK. Not clear on how MMTTY (in N1MM or in WinWarbler or by itself)
/archives//html/RTTY/2017-10/msg00099.html (9,007 bytes)

Current List: 321 - 340
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] [17] [18]
This search system is powered by Namazu