Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:plaws0@gmail.com: 353 ]

Total 353 documents matching your query.

301. Re: [RTTY] (fwd) ARLB007 FCC Invites Comments on ARRL Petition That Seeks 80/75 Meter Adjustments (score: 1)
Author: Peter Laws <plaws0@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Feb 2016 10:58:14 -0600
I finally looked at this. I would support this if it did not include digital privileges for Technicians (and the 27 remaining Novices). If that single portion -- absent from ARRL's bulletin -- were r
/archives//html/RTTY/2016-02/msg00307.html (9,102 bytes)

302. Re: [RTTY] (fwd) ARLB007 FCC Invites Comments on ARRL Petition That Seeks 80/75 Meter Adjustments (score: 1)
Author: Peter Laws <plaws0@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 1 Mar 2016 13:06:46 -0600
You've missed the point completely. There is no justification for giving Technicians (or the 12,891 remaining Novices) Data privileges on 80 m or anywhere else (they already have it on every band 10
/archives//html/RTTY/2016-03/msg00001.html (8,821 bytes)

303. Re: [RTTY] (fwd) ARLB007 FCC Invites Comments on ARRL Petition That Seeks 80/75 Meter Adjustments (score: 1)
Author: Peter Laws <plaws0@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 1 Mar 2016 15:33:52 -0600
You're right. Open all the bands and all the modes. Can we at least give them a hard test first? Clearly, none of you have read through the question and answer pools since you last took a test. If we
/archives//html/RTTY/2016-03/msg00003.html (8,330 bytes)

304. Re: [RTTY] 80 meters (score: 1)
Author: Peter Laws <plaws0@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2016 21:56:05 -0600
OK, so you haven't looked at the post 2000 test Q&A pools. Mythology. Pretty much the wave of the past at this point. People have been doing this for 20 years, maybe more. Technicians (and the 12,891
/archives//html/RTTY/2016-03/msg00011.html (8,564 bytes)

305. Re: [RTTY] Some basic RTTY radio questions (score: 1)
Author: Peter Laws <plaws0@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2016 13:29:26 -0600
I have not had the opportunity to be near enough to my radio to do this, but I plan to. Enlightening! Thanks from me, too! -- Peter Laws | N5UWY | plaws plaws net | Travel by Train! _________________
/archives//html/RTTY/2016-03/msg00032.html (8,381 bytes)

306. Re: [RTTY] Contest this weekend (score: 1)
Author: Peter Laws <plaws0@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2016 22:12:35 -0500
I never understand this. To my knowledge, no operators are required to participate in this or any other contest. If the rules aren't to an operator's liking ... they shouldn't participate. It's prett
/archives//html/RTTY/2016-03/msg00164.html (8,071 bytes)

307. Re: [RTTY] Trailing CQ (score: 1)
Author: Peter Laws <plaws0@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2016 16:39:46 -0500
I agree wholeheartedly as above and when I'm CQing, I don't want a potential caller that tuned across my signal mid-transmission to have to wonder if I'm answering a CQ, answering a caller, or CQing.
/archives//html/RTTY/2016-03/msg00207.html (10,320 bytes)

308. Re: [RTTY] Honor Roll, thought I had it (score: 1)
Author: Peter Laws <plaws0@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2016 17:56:19 -0500
340 is top of the Honor Roll *now*, but in a few hours you'll only need 339 ... AFAIK, this isn't new - I don't believe Deleted Entities have never counted for DXCC Honor Roll (nor the much newer DXC
/archives//html/RTTY/2016-03/msg00304.html (7,080 bytes)

309. [RTTY] DXCC Honor Roll (score: 1)
Author: Peter Laws <plaws0@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2016 19:11:59 -0500
Some confusion over Deleteds. K3UR has the history of the DXCC Honor Roll in the July 2013 "How's DX?" Deleteds started in 1962 and 'sometime after that', HR status was conferred when your total got
/archives//html/RTTY/2016-03/msg00305.html (7,039 bytes)

310. Re: [RTTY] 2016 Digital Mode Most Wanted Survey (score: 1)
Author: Peter Laws <plaws0@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 30 Apr 2016 17:59:49 -0500
Only have 114 confirmed on RTTY so took a while to click all those buttons. Hit submit only to be told that my session expired. Better luck next time, guys. -- Peter Laws | N5UWY | plaws plaws net |
/archives//html/RTTY/2016-04/msg00217.html (8,961 bytes)

311. Re: [RTTY] Icom Rigs For Contesting (score: 1)
Author: Peter Laws <plaws0@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2016 22:00:18 -0500
Pretty much the same relationship as between the IC-746Pro (IC-7400 in some markets) and the IC-756Pro-something (I think it was closest to the Pro "I" - the 746 never got a II or III) - RTTY decode
/archives//html/RTTY/2016-07/msg00055.html (8,257 bytes)

312. Re: [RTTY] Icom Rigs For Contesting (score: 1)
Author: Peter Laws <plaws0@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 23 Jul 2016 11:18:36 -0500
Funny you mention that - I got an Icom mic for my HT from a fellow in Japan (via Amazon) for MUCH cheaper than any domestic vendor. Shipping was clearly via a slow boat from Japan, but no matter. Muc
/archives//html/RTTY/2016-07/msg00058.html (8,442 bytes)

313. Re: [RTTY] Rig control via USB (score: 1)
Author: Peter Laws <plaws0@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 23 Jul 2016 13:33:28 -0500
Whatchu talkin' about, Willis? This looks grand: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1iOinuoMBHA But I'm sticking to my Icoms for now. :-) -- Peter Laws | N5UWY | plaws plaws net | Travel by Train! _____
/archives//html/RTTY/2016-07/msg00061.html (6,865 bytes)

314. Re: [RTTY] RM-11708 (score: 1)
Author: Peter Laws <plaws0@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2016 16:20:12 -0500
Finally reared its ugly head, eh? -- Peter Laws | N5UWY | plaws plaws net | Travel by Train! _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http://lists.contest
/archives//html/RTTY/2016-07/msg00097.html (7,287 bytes)

315. Re: [RTTY] RM-11708 (score: 1)
Author: Peter Laws <plaws0@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2016 16:35:24 -0500
https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/0728122180423 -- Peter Laws | N5UWY | plaws plaws net | Travel by Train! _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http://l
/archives//html/RTTY/2016-07/msg00098.html (6,856 bytes)

316. [RTTY] Soundcard Interface shootout? (score: 1)
Author: Peter Laws <plaws0@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2016 14:24:43 -0500
Anyone done one? Surely there is variation between the different (and wildly overpriced) interfaces. Anyone quantified it? I mean, isolation transformers and relays and whatnot probably don't have a
/archives//html/RTTY/2016-08/msg00117.html (6,688 bytes)

317. Re: [RTTY] Soundcard Interface shootout? (score: 1)
Author: Peter Laws <plaws0@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2016 19:20:08 -0500
No, no, no. Not going there. I read your page but I still think they are overpriced! Regardless, I will probably get another. Which is why I'm trying to find out who has the best sound processor. --
/archives//html/RTTY/2016-08/msg00119.html (7,979 bytes)

318. Re: [RTTY] Soundcard Interface shootout? (score: 1)
Author: Peter Laws <plaws0@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2016 19:41:13 -0500
Let me reiterate this again ... I'm interested in an evaluation of the sound processor in the various interfaces. Those can be evaluated without regard to people's tastes. -- Peter Laws | N5UWY | pla
/archives//html/RTTY/2016-08/msg00121.html (7,880 bytes)

319. Re: [RTTY] PLEASE operate in the MAKROTHEN RTTY contest this weekend! (score: 1)
Author: Peter Laws <plaws0@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 7 Oct 2016 15:29:33 -0400
Maybe BARTG would be interested in taking over? -- Peter Laws | N5UWY | plaws plaws net | Travel by Train! _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http:/
/archives//html/RTTY/2016-10/msg00067.html (7,640 bytes)

320. Re: [RTTY] PLEASE operate in the MAKROTHEN RTTY contest thisweekend! (score: 1)
Author: Peter Laws <plaws0@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2016 10:14:32 -0500
A couple observations. 1) Makrothen is distance based and ZS is kinda off in a corner by itself (density of hams wise) so most of your QSOs will be worth more points for both ends making you desirabl
/archives//html/RTTY/2016-10/msg00260.html (9,906 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu