Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:plaws0@gmail.com: 353 ]

Total 353 documents matching your query.

201. Re: [RTTY] CQ to accept EQSL for awards (score: 1)
Author: Peter Laws <plaws0@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2009 10:27:05 -0500
That they can be sent is disturbing. You could do that with paper cards, too, of course, but a system can be designed to prevent this type of thing. No kidding! And designed just so. If I were to sig
/archives//html/RTTY/2009-10/msg00034.html (8,323 bytes)

202. Re: [RTTY] CQ to accept EQSL for awards (score: 1)
Author: Peter Laws <plaws0@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2009 15:20:01 -0500
Seriously? Did I misread what you wrote? I need to give eQSL total access to my LoTW account to get "verified"? Not this ham. Actually, signing your logs proves that you were the one that uploaded th
/archives//html/RTTY/2009-10/msg00038.html (8,446 bytes)

203. Re: [RTTY] K4M on RTTY (score: 1)
Author: Peter Laws <plaws0@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2009 11:03:09 -0500
On the local DX list, N5OK just reported working them on 20 RTTY this morning (~1400 z), so there is some hope! -- Peter Laws | N5UWY | plaws plaws net | Travel by Train! ____________________________
/archives//html/RTTY/2009-10/msg00108.html (7,772 bytes)

204. Re: [RTTY] 3D2KJ on 10144.7 (score: 1)
Author: Peter Laws <plaws0@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2009 08:41:04 -0500
Not hard enough, evidently! I recommend cutting back to 50 W. :-) Congrats! -- Peter Laws | N5UWY | plaws plaws net | Travel by Train! _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing lis
/archives//html/RTTY/2009-10/msg00140.html (6,750 bytes)

205. [RTTY] Fwd: [OKDXA] FW: [CQ-Contest] Tragic Accident - C6APR (score: 1)
Author: Peter Laws <plaws0@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2009 16:21:53 -0500
News story http://www.miamiherald.com/news/florida/AP/story/1293230.html -- Forwarded message -- From: Bert Aaron <k2ba@cox.net> Date: Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 16:12 Subject: [OKDXA] FW: [CQ-Contest] Tra
/archives//html/RTTY/2009-10/msg00147.html (9,252 bytes)

206. Re: [RTTY] 5H1HS (score: 1)
Author: Peter Laws <plaws0@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 9 Nov 2009 17:04:49 -0600
As noted on the cluster the other week ... "LOTS of dits!" -- Peter Laws | N5UWY | plaws plaws net | Travel by Train! _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting
/archives//html/RTTY/2009-11/msg00059.html (6,739 bytes)

207. Re: [RTTY] Thanks (score: 1)
Author: Peter Laws <plaws0@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 21 Nov 2009 09:10:27 -0600
And thanks to the ARRL for my 2009 RTTY Roundup certificate (1st place, SOLP, Oklahoma). Was in the box when I looked yesterday. -- Peter Laws | N5UWY | plaws plaws net | Travel by Train! ___________
/archives//html/RTTY/2009-11/msg00108.html (6,460 bytes)

208. Re: [RTTY] FW: Misuse of cluster (score: 1)
Author: Peter Laws <plaws0@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2009 16:20:53 -0600
Are you *sure* that's what the cluster is for? 'Cause if you analyzed the traffic I'm not sure "actually spotting DX that's on the air" -- really should be "that you just worked" -- would be the majo
/archives//html/RTTY/2009-12/msg00010.html (8,397 bytes)

209. Re: [RTTY] FW: Misuse of cluster (score: 1)
Author: Peter Laws <plaws0@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2009 16:56:08 -0600
I agree with you - the DX Cluster is for spotting DX. I just think that, based on sampling the traffic over the years, you and I are in the minority. -- Peter Laws | N5UWY | plaws plaws net | Travel
/archives//html/RTTY/2009-12/msg00013.html (8,248 bytes)

210. Re: [RTTY] Cluster (score: 1)
Author: Peter Laws <plaws0@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2009 11:52:32 -0600
Dude, let it go. -- Peter Laws | N5UWY | plaws plaws net | Travel by Train! _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/l
/archives//html/RTTY/2009-12/msg00018.html (6,582 bytes)

211. Re: [RTTY] [dxlab] Need to change GU0SUP setup (score: 1)
Author: Peter Laws <plaws0@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Dec 2009 18:08:45 -0600
SP3 won't bite you. Been running it for some time (1 year?). Most DIY-type MoBos come with headers for at least one COM (serial) port and, usually, one LPT (parallel) port. Should be easy enough to f
/archives//html/RTTY/2009-12/msg00107.html (8,151 bytes)

212. Re: [RTTY] Belkin F5U103 USB to serial adapter question (score: 1)
Author: Peter Laws <plaws0@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Dec 2009 19:28:50 -0600
Not sure what you mean here. Is this a stand-alone box with DB-9 or other ports on it and you need a USB cable? Or something else? -- Peter Laws | N5UWY | plaws plaws net | Travel by Train! _________
/archives//html/RTTY/2009-12/msg00122.html (7,607 bytes)

213. Re: [RTTY] [icom746pro] Cable for ACC1? (score: 1)
Author: Peter Laws <plaws0@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 1 Jan 2010 14:33:44 -0600
The 8-pin modular on the back of the RB+ is the way to go. Been looking at print-outs of schematics all morning. My RB+ is wired to use the 8-pin round connector on the front of my IC746Pro. Because
/archives//html/RTTY/2010-01/msg00001.html (9,251 bytes)

214. Re: [RTTY] RTTY Roundup K5DU Single Op HP (score: 1)
Author: Peter Laws <plaws0@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2010 10:56:57 -0600
Seems to have been a "feature" for the year. Usually at the beginning of a macro. Very odd and annoying. Happy to have worked K5DU again! -- Peter Laws | N5UWY | plaws plaws net | Travel by Train! __
/archives//html/RTTY/2010-01/msg00018.html (7,805 bytes)

215. Re: [RTTY] What abt LINE feed (score: 1)
Author: Peter Laws <plaws0@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2010 11:52:22 -0600
Depends where it is. At the beginning of a macro, it puts the info on a new line. At the end of a macro, it occasionally makes the info jump as you go to click. Gotta put something at the end of the
/archives//html/RTTY/2010-01/msg00024.html (7,135 bytes)

216. Re: [RTTY] What abt LINE feed (score: 1)
Author: Peter Laws <plaws0@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2010 14:29:23 -0600
Must be awfully hard to read after a few hundred QSOs what with all those lines printed over top of each other. In olden days, the print head would surely have ripped through the paper after 5 or six
/archives//html/RTTY/2010-01/msg00034.html (7,580 bytes)

217. Re: [RTTY] beyond optimization ? (score: 1)
Author: Peter Laws <plaws0@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2010 14:40:20 -0600
I used to send the exchange 3 times for that very reason given that I am 10 dB below a kW and my dipole is a good 20' lower than most tribanders. Then I realized that *most* people get it first time.
/archives//html/RTTY/2010-01/msg00036.html (8,567 bytes)

218. Re: [RTTY] resends (score: 1)
Author: Peter Laws <plaws0@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2010 14:42:19 -0600
Another opportunity for optimization! Mine are "QTH? QTH?", "CALL? CALL?", and ... I guess it's "NAME? NAME?" for whichever one uses a name. Oh and a "ZONE? ZONE?" for CQ WW. -- Peter Laws | N5UWY |
/archives//html/RTTY/2010-01/msg00037.html (7,153 bytes)

219. Re: [RTTY] Exchange Length (score: 1)
Author: Peter Laws <plaws0@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2010 10:00:08 -0600
RST is silly, given that everyone sends 599, but it *is* part of the exchange. Good that there are no referees. :-) OK a few insist that 5NN is shorter. -- Peter Laws | N5UWY | plaws plaws net | Trav
/archives//html/RTTY/2010-01/msg00087.html (7,342 bytes)

220. Re: [RTTY] Exchange Length (score: 1)
Author: Peter Laws <plaws0@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2010 15:39:06 -0600
I know ... makes it plain that the folks that use it aren't really up on what they are doing. -- Peter Laws | N5UWY | plaws plaws net | Travel by Train! ______________________________________________
/archives//html/RTTY/2010-01/msg00103.html (7,373 bytes)

Current List: 201 - 220
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] [17] [18]
This search system is powered by Namazu