Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:plaws0@gmail.com: 353 ]

Total 353 documents matching your query.

181. Re: [RTTY] Fun, but (score: 1)
Author: Peter Laws <plaws0@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 3 Mar 2009 19:05:23 -0600
Hey now. You can't complain about an op doing that when you *chose* to answer his CQ! It was obvious that he wasn't interested in the contest ... -- Peter Laws | N5UWY | plaws plaws net | Travel by T
/archives//html/RTTY/2009-03/msg00120.html (8,824 bytes)

182. Re: [RTTY] Calibration Check with W1AW RTTY Bulletin (score: 1)
Author: Peter Laws <plaws0@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 4 Mar 2009 20:25:09 -0600
Mark and his younger brother, Space, aren't really relevant. It's the difference between them that is important. And really, there are still a lot of folks that seem to be running a 200-Hz shift and,
/archives//html/RTTY/2009-03/msg00125.html (8,087 bytes)

183. Re: [RTTY] NAQP RTTY Frequencies (score: 1)
Author: Peter Laws <plaws0@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 5 Mar 2009 10:20:17 -0600
This one I knew about and I try to abide by. Is this in the rules? If not, how were we to know? Besides this thread, I mean. I have no problem making a PSK exception in all the RTTY contest rules - i
/archives//html/RTTY/2009-03/msg00137.html (8,369 bytes)

184. Re: [RTTY] NAQP RTTY Frequencies (score: 1)
Author: Peter Laws <plaws0@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 5 Mar 2009 17:18:07 -0600
Whoa, whoa, whoa. If an action is not prohibited by the contest rules (or FCC/IC rules), how can doing doing that action cause disqualification? Is this some kind of double secret probation? -- Peter
/archives//html/RTTY/2009-03/msg00144.html (9,189 bytes)

185. Re: [RTTY] RTTY and LoTW (score: 1)
Author: Peter Laws <plaws0@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 14 Mar 2009 14:46:20 -0500
Contest name? You only need that if you are uploading or mailing a contest log. How are you trying to add your logs to LoTW? Via direct upload after signing? Via a logging program? -- Peter Laws | N5
/archives//html/RTTY/2009-03/msg00226.html (8,082 bytes)

186. Re: [RTTY] QRX for a while... (score: 1)
Author: Peter Laws <plaws0@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2009 14:37:43 -0500
You'll still need a new LoTW cert for when you operate as W2UP/0 ... :-( -- Peter Laws | N5UWY | plaws plaws net | Travel by Train! _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list R
/archives//html/RTTY/2009-03/msg00365.html (7,557 bytes)

187. Re: [RTTY] BARTG HF Contest (score: 1)
Author: Peter Laws <plaws0@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 5 Apr 2009 11:10:23 -0500
I'm all in favor of having to "sign portable" (or self-assigned indicators as the FCC calls them) when not in your "home" district and, in fact, did so when I live in Illinois. The problem is not wit
/archives//html/RTTY/2009-04/msg00028.html (8,335 bytes)

188. Re: [RTTY] VK9GMW - no more RTTY (score: 1)
Author: Peter Laws <plaws0@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2009 09:24:10 -0500
OK, so when are they QRT? 2009-04-10 (today), 2009-04-12 (Sunday), 2009-04-22 (a week from next Wednesday) or Sunday, 2009-04-12? All are listed - which is correct? -- Peter Laws | N5UWY | plaws plaw
/archives//html/RTTY/2009-04/msg00070.html (8,737 bytes)

189. Re: [RTTY] Larry Fields has invited you to Tubely (score: 1)
Author: Peter Laws <plaws0@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2009 10:03:11 -0500
More generally, DON'T ALLOW WEBSITES TO UPLOAD YOUR ADDRESSBOOK. Peter Fondly remembering the good old days, pre-eternal September ... -- Peter Laws | N5UWY | plaws plaws net | Travel by Train! _____
/archives//html/RTTY/2009-04/msg00109.html (7,423 bytes)

190. Re: [RTTY] RTTY in ARRL Field Day (score: 1)
Author: Peter Laws <plaws0@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 15:20:49 -0500
Come on, Chen - all hams are in the US and all hams participate in Field Day. You know that. It's a Well Known Fact. -- Peter Laws | N5UWY | plaws plaws net | Travel by Train! _______________________
/archives//html/RTTY/2009-05/msg00039.html (7,856 bytes)

191. Re: [RTTY] RTTY in ARRL Field Day (score: 1)
Author: Peter Laws <plaws0@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2009 16:19:09 -0500
I hung out at W5NOR's PSK tent for a bit. Didn't operate but saw and heard about several instances of the same thing happening. One of the other hams present bemoaned the fact that there was no set s
/archives//html/RTTY/2009-06/msg00139.html (7,916 bytes)

192. Re: [RTTY] RTTY in ARRL Field Day (score: 1)
Author: Peter Laws <plaws0@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 10:48:34 -0500
You had buffers??? :-) I used PC-PAKRATT and a PK-232 in the 1994 Roundup at W5YM. Actually did use the limited macros available in that and sort of learned as I went along, figuring out that you cou
/archives//html/RTTY/2009-06/msg00143.html (7,691 bytes)

193. Re: [RTTY] 5 Band WAS all RTTY and all LoTW (score: 1)
Author: Peter Laws <plaws0@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 16 Aug 2009 08:43:55 -0500
Congrats! Pity there is no way to claim 5BWAS via LoTW. -- Peter Laws | N5UWY | plaws plaws net | Travel by Train! _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.co
/archives//html/RTTY/2009-08/msg00044.html (7,540 bytes)

194. Re: [RTTY] Crystal filter width preferences for RTTY contesting (score: 1)
Author: Peter Laws <plaws0@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2009 16:10:52 -0500
NO! Keep going! Whenever we can get Chen going, we all get educated! :-) -- Peter Laws | N5UWY | plaws plaws net | Travel by Train! _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list R
/archives//html/RTTY/2009-08/msg00139.html (10,370 bytes)

195. Re: [RTTY] Zone sent as letters? (score: 1)
Author: Peter Laws <plaws0@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 27 Sep 2009 11:53:55 -0500
Me too! I'm poking at CQWW and immediately went and changed my EXCH macro! :-) -- Peter Laws | N5UWY | plaws plaws net | Travel by Train! _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing
/archives//html/RTTY/2009-09/msg00104.html (7,593 bytes)

196. Re: [RTTY] Zone sent as letters? (score: 1)
Author: Peter Laws <plaws0@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2009 09:47:11 -0500
I thought about this on the weekend (when I made a whopping 44 Qs ... but C3 and FO8 for new ones :-). I have always used a leading 0 but now am having second thoughts. I did insert a - in my macro -
/archives//html/RTTY/2009-09/msg00122.html (8,673 bytes)

197. Re: [RTTY] Zone sent as letters? (score: 1)
Author: Peter Laws <plaws0@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2009 11:21:55 -0500
That would defeat the point of using the variable. In N1MM, you determine the exchange when you start the log for a new contest. Because it's a variable in the macro, you usually don't have to change
/archives//html/RTTY/2009-09/msg00129.html (8,911 bytes)

198. Re: [RTTY] Zone sent as Letters (score: 1)
Author: Peter Laws <plaws0@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2009 09:48:03 -0500
I prefer to copy the exchange and not worry about what the logging programs *thinks* is the right answer. And since the exchange is RST+cqz+state, that's what I send ... Except I drop the RST in my "
/archives//html/RTTY/2009-09/msg00211.html (7,524 bytes)

199. Re: [RTTY] AFSK vs FSK question (score: 1)
Author: Peter Laws <plaws0@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 4 Oct 2009 18:02:38 -0500
Not really a problem, just don't overdrive your audio. AFSK and FSK are indistinguishable on the air ... as long as you don't overdrive the audio. On my IC746Pro, I just needed the correct cable for
/archives//html/RTTY/2009-10/msg00025.html (7,825 bytes)

200. Re: [RTTY] CQ to accept EQSL for awards (score: 1)
Author: Peter Laws <plaws0@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 4 Oct 2009 20:55:51 -0500
Old thread, I know, but eQSL came up at the VE session the other night and I got to thinking that when I work all 40 CQ Zones, I'll probably sign up, since eQSL is now accepted for the WAZ awards. Lo
/archives//html/RTTY/2009-10/msg00029.html (8,035 bytes)

Current List: 181 - 200
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] [17] [18]
This search system is powered by Namazu