Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:plaws0@gmail.com: 353 ]

Total 353 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [RTTY] ARRL Bandwidth Proposal (score: 1)
Author: Peter Laws <plaws0@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2005 10:41:48 -0500
I did read it - thanks for the link. I should know this, but since I'm at work, apparently I've forgotten: What is the bandwidth of a 170 Hz-shift RTTY signal? It's more than 170 Hz, but by how much!
/archives//html/RTTY/2005-04/msg00115.html (8,088 bytes)

2. Re: [RTTY] ARRL Bandwidth Proposal (score: 1)
Author: Peter Laws <plaws0@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2005 13:15:40 -0500
... OK, so we can safely say, then, that the BW of RTTY is "about" 310-350 Hz. Looking at the EC's proposed bandplan (http://www.arrl.org/news/stories/2005/04/13/1/?nc=1), it appears that the 500-Hz
/archives//html/RTTY/2005-04/msg00119.html (8,916 bytes)

3. Re: [RTTY] WORKING REMOTLEY (score: 1)
Author: Peter Laws <plaws0@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 13 May 2005 13:50:12 -0500
We use the open source rdesktop client on our Solaris and RedHat systems at work so that we can access the PCs we're issued for Outlook (Lookout?) mail ... Pretty slick. I believe the same protocol i
/archives//html/RTTY/2005-05/msg00057.html (7,482 bytes)

4. Re: [RTTY] RTTY Call Sign Pirate (score: 1)
Author: Peter Laws <plaws0@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2005 13:54:30 -0500
Or, you could look up N1LDY on QRZ, from which we learn ... "My Call Sign Was Pirate in the RTTY Contest of 28/03/05 29/03/05 and other dates in RTTY, And CW as VP5/N1LDY i have no plans to be there
/archives//html/RTTY/2005-06/msg00001.html (7,155 bytes)

5. Re: [RTTY] Field Day & Digital Modes (score: 1)
Author: Peter Laws <plaws0@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2005 10:31:31 -0500
I made some RTTY contacts last year ... not a whole lot of activity. This year, I'll update my CQ to include the fact that I'm a "delta" since deltas can't work deltas for points. -- Peter Laws | N5U
/archives//html/RTTY/2005-06/msg00102.html (7,437 bytes)

6. Re: [RTTY] Fwd: ANARTS F6IRF SOST HP (score: 1)
Author: Peter Laws <plaws0@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2005 11:14:05 -0500
I think I see where you're coming from, but if SO2R stations aren't in a separate category, then why have Multi-Ops in a separate category? -- Peter Laws | N5UWY/9 | plaws0 gmail ____________________
/archives//html/RTTY/2005-06/msg00108.html (8,482 bytes)

7. Re: [RTTY] Master.CallFile (score: 1)
Author: Peter Laws <plaws0@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2005 13:57:09 -0500
I have the same issue - N5UW is probably closer to DXCC than I am for this reason. I don't use MASTER or FRIEND.INI - if I don't get the call, I don't get the call. -- Peter Laws | N5UWY/9 | plaws0 g
/archives//html/RTTY/2005-06/msg00119.html (7,512 bytes)

8. Re: [RTTY] Master.CallFile (score: 1)
Author: Peter Laws <plaws0@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2005 19:31:47 -0500
That would be good - then maybe when folks start seeing dupes that aren't really dupes, they'll copy the call better.. :-) It occurs to me that N5UW and I also have the same sorter . -- Peter Laws |
/archives//html/RTTY/2005-06/msg00133.html (7,592 bytes)

9. Re: [RTTY] Field Day (score: 1)
Author: Peter Laws <plaws0@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 25 Jun 2005 14:23:29 -0500
Plenty of RTTY sigs on 20 as of 1922 or so ... -- Peter Laws | N5UWY/9 | plaws0 gmail _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com
/archives//html/RTTY/2005-06/msg00208.html (7,331 bytes)

10. Re: [RTTY] FS DXP-38 (score: 1)
Author: Peter Laws <plaws0@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 1 Jul 2005 08:48:37 -0500
We know - this is the fourth time you've posted the item since June 12. Perhaps you should try eBay. -- Peter Laws | N5UWY/9 | plaws0 gmail _______________________________________________ RTTY mailin
/archives//html/RTTY/2005-07/msg00002.html (6,593 bytes)

11. Re: [RTTY] FS DXP-38 (score: 1)
Author: Peter Laws <plaws0@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 1 Jul 2005 09:27:19 -0500
So this isn't eBay. One ad is fine (assuming it's OK with the list's owner), but 4 in three weeks? For the same item? -- Peter Laws | N5UWY/9 | plaws0 gmail __________________________________________
/archives//html/RTTY/2005-07/msg00003.html (7,396 bytes)

12. Re: [RTTY] Sound Card Testing (score: 1)
Author: Peter Laws <plaws0@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 15:54:26 -0500
-- Peter Laws | N5UWY/9 | plaws0 gmail Peter Laws RR Emergency Numbers: http://plaws.net/rail/emergency.shtml Our Military Needs YOU: Register for the Draft at http://www.sss.gov/ 73, Peter Laws N5UW
/archives//html/RTTY/2005-07/msg00214.html (8,957 bytes)

13. Re: [RTTY] Sound Card Testing (score: 1)
Author: Peter Laws <plaws0@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 15:54:06 -0500
Doesn't seem to be ham-radio focused ... I had an SB64AWE Gold (ISA) in an Abit KT7A mobo and all was good. I added a 4 port serial card and could never get the IRQs to all stop irking each other so
/archives//html/RTTY/2005-07/msg00215.html (7,934 bytes)

14. Re: [RTTY] Sound Card Testing (score: 1)
Author: Peter Laws <plaws0@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 16:21:11 -0500
I remember that ... In googling around, thought, that card appears to be EOLed. -- Peter Laws | N5UWY/9 | plaws0 gmail _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contestin
/archives//html/RTTY/2005-07/msg00217.html (8,248 bytes)

15. Re: [RTTY] Sound Card Testing (score: 1)
Author: Peter Laws <plaws0@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 08:25:09 -0500
The question is, is it worth picking on e up on eBay or is there a successor that is as good or better? -- Peter Laws | N5UWY/9 | plaws0 gmail _______________________________________________ RTTY mai
/archives//html/RTTY/2005-07/msg00222.html (7,913 bytes)

16. [RTTY] RTTY WAS #410?? (score: 1)
Author: Peter Laws <plaws0@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 10:27:59 -0500
I know we've discussed this before ... I just got my RTTY WAS in the mail 2 minutes ago. Am I really only the 410th recipient? The certificate also has "DIGITAL" printed above the big WAS letters (ra
/archives//html/RTTY/2005-07/msg00237.html (7,326 bytes)

17. Re: [RTTY] RTTY WAS #410?? (score: 1)
Author: Peter Laws <plaws0@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 13:35:12 -0500
Thanks to all that replied. I know there were some tech glitches in the recent past which caused some certificates having to be reissues. The ARRL has changed the WAS program in subtle ways tho' I co
/archives//html/RTTY/2005-07/msg00241.html (7,977 bytes)

18. Re: [RTTY] RTTY WAS #410?? (score: 1)
Author: Peter Laws <plaws0@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2005 08:57:00 -0500
Ain't that the truth! I had them all worked between RTTY Roundup and Field Day last year ... DIdn't get the last card until May of this year, and that was after (in some cases) multiple SASEs and ema
/archives//html/RTTY/2005-07/msg00246.html (8,489 bytes)

19. Re: [RTTY] RTTY WAS #410?? (score: 1)
Author: Peter Laws <plaws0@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2005 10:19:14 -0500
I'd rather have, or send, a card than get (or send) a byte. -- Peter Laws | N5UWY/9 | plaws0 gmail _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http://lists.c
/archives//html/RTTY/2005-07/msg00249.html (8,070 bytes)

20. Re: [RTTY] RTTY WAS (score: 1)
Author: Peter Laws <plaws0@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 31 Jul 2005 10:03:41 -0500
That's what macros are for! As others have said, it's easier to work them all on a few contest weekends (or one, if you have the station). QSLing is definitely the hard part. It's hit-or-miss. Someti
/archives//html/RTTY/2005-07/msg00256.html (8,105 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] [17] [18]
This search system is powered by Namazu