Mail Archive Search: <+from:plaws@plaws.net>

Results:

References: [ +from:plaws@plaws.net: 430 ]

Total 430 documents matching your query.

41. Re: [RTTY] RTTY copy question (score: 1): Author: Peter Laws <plaws@plaws.net>; Date: Wed, 19 May 2004 16:55:20 -0500 (CDT); PK-232s use 200 Hz shift, IIRC, so maybe your decoder couldn't handle 200? Oh, wait ... *you* have the PK232 ... Hmm. I know from experience that PKs have no issue with 170 ... so in the immortal wor; /archives//html/RTTY/2004-05/msg00147.html (7,461 bytes)
42. Re: [RTTY] WTB: PK232 (score: 1): Author: Peter Laws <plaws@plaws.net>; Date: Sat, 29 May 2004 11:21:14 -0500 (CDT); Ahh, WF1B and a PK-232. That's how W5YM (N5UWY, Op) got 1st place, SOHP, Ark section in the 1996 Roundup. Had a Timewave DSP box as well. Fun stuff. eBay has several listed and searching for 'pk 232'; /archives//html/RTTY/2004-05/msg00182.html (7,380 bytes)
43. Re: [RTTY] RIGrunner? (score: 1): Author: Peter Laws <plaws@plaws.net>; Date: Mon, 31 May 2004 10:45:59 -0500 (CDT); The RIGrunners are actually from West Mountain Radio, though I, too, bought mine from Powerwerx. Powerwerx' website works like it should unlike many other online vendors. I have the 4008 which has 9; /archives//html/RTTY/2004-05/msg00202.html (7,302 bytes)
44. [RTTY] FD RTTY Ops? (score: 1): Author: Peter Laws <plaws@plaws.net>; Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2004 09:19:58 -0500 (CDT); I plan to work RTTY this weekend from home (1D IL) mostly to find the 4 states I'm missing for WAS. Anyone planning to be on from Delaware, Montana, Vermont, or West Virginia? -- 73, Peter Laws N5UWY; /archives//html/RTTY/2004-06/msg00153.html (6,173 bytes)
45. Re: [RTTY] FD RTTY Ops? (score: 1): Author: Peter Laws <plaws@plaws.net>; Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2004 08:59:22 -0500 (CDT); I said the above. A valid request, but I rarely call CQ. RTTY on FD may be a different thing in terms of volume -- I've never operated RTTY on FD -- so if I do call CQ, I'll amend my buffer as sugges; /archives//html/RTTY/2004-06/msg00159.html (7,730 bytes)
46. Re: [RTTY] RTTY DXCC for AA5VU (score: 1): Author: Peter Laws <plaws@plaws.net>; Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2004 13:46:15 -0500 (CDT); Pah - *I'm* impressed. I hope to join you someday! :-) Congrats!! -- 73, Peter Laws N5UWY/9 _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http://lists.contesti; /archives//html/RTTY/2004-06/msg00162.html (6,448 bytes)
47. [RTTY] NAQP - need MT ... (score: 1): Author: Peter Laws <plaws@plaws.net>; Date: Fri, 16 Jul 2004 19:30:47 -0500 (CDT); I know there will be at least one station operating from Vermont ... how about Montana? I need only those to states to have worked all on RTTY (and have 36 confirmed). MT? Any 7s plan to be on this w; /archives//html/RTTY/2004-07/msg00158.html (6,741 bytes)
48. Re: [RTTY] Basic NAQP RTTY Reminders (score: 1): Author: Peter Laws <plaws@plaws.net>; Date: Sat, 17 Jul 2004 10:12:24 -0500 (CDT); I haven't checked N1MM Logger (which reminds me ...) but do you log Mexico as "Mexico" or as "XE"? -- 73, Peter Laws N5UWY/9 _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@con; /archives//html/RTTY/2004-07/msg00166.html (7,158 bytes)
49. Re: [RTTY] NAQP from Europe (score: 1): Author: Peter Laws <plaws@plaws.net>; Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2004 13:14:20 -0500 (CDT); The bands were a little weird - even managed a few Qs on 10 m. I saw the ET print, but couldn't work him. Managed to get 5W0DL on 20 and 40, tho', which was a new one for me. It was odd. Had a hard t; /archives//html/RTTY/2004-07/msg00207.html (6,928 bytes)
50. Re: [RTTY] RE: no rtty ops in Delaware (score: 1): Author: Peter Laws <plaws@plaws.net>; Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2004 15:46:30 -0500 (CDT); WA3GGM was gracious enough to work me as well after my plea here. Likewise W8WEJ for WV. Got N1MGO in VT on the weekend, so all I need is Montana as well! -- 73, Peter Laws N5UWY/9 Looking for MT on; /archives//html/RTTY/2004-07/msg00231.html (7,168 bytes)
51. Re: [RTTY] RE: no rtty ops in Delaware (score: 1): Author: Peter Laws <plaws@plaws.net>; Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2004 21:35:47 -0500 (CDT); You can't get RTTY WAS with PSK 31. You *can* get Digital WAS with it, though, and I will, but I want to finish RTTY WAS first ... :-) Hmm, there's a RTTY WAC too ... Must look at my cards again ...; /archives//html/RTTY/2004-07/msg00238.html (8,098 bytes)
52. Re: [RTTY] RE: no rtty ops in Delaware (score: 1): Author: Peter Laws <plaws@plaws.net>; Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2004 22:06:30 -0500 (CDT); Maybe DXCC changed? According to http://www.arrl.org/awards/dxcc/rules.html#si, "Baudot, ASCII, AMTOR and packet count as RTTY." There's no "only", so it's not quite definitive if you're into picking; /archives//html/RTTY/2004-07/msg00240.html (9,435 bytes)
53. Re: [RTTY] RULES FOR SCC RTTY 2004 HAVE BEEN MODIFIED! (score: 1): Author: Peter Laws <plaws@plaws.net>; Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2004 17:07:26 -0500 (CDT); Or maybe another category? SO, SOA, MS, etc. One thing that always bugged me about November SS was that if my XYL and I both wanted to operate my 100 W station, we had to enter as a Multi ... But mul; /archives//html/RTTY/2004-08/msg00100.html (9,478 bytes)
54. Re: [RTTY] Zone 4 (score: 1): Author: Peter Laws <plaws@plaws.net>; Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2004 09:57:46 -0500 (CDT); Not necessarily .... :-) -- 73, Peter Laws N5UWY/9 WAC (phone) WAS #51466 (SSB) _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailm; /archives//html/RTTY/2004-09/msg00222.html (7,162 bytes)
55. [RTTY] CQ WW RTTY N5UWY/9 SOAB LP (score: 1): Author: Peter Laws <plaws@plaws.net>; Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2004 10:01:13 -0500 (CDT); Call: N5UWY/9 Operator(s): N5UWY Station: N5UWY Class: SOAB LP QTH: IL Operating Time (hrs): 13.8 Summary: Band QSOs Pts State/Prov DX Zones -- 80: 53 61 27 3 40: 4 4 3 2 20: 91 175 47 14 15: 63 133; /archives//html/RTTY/2004-09/msg00225.html (7,368 bytes)
56. Re: [RTTY] Operating practices in CQWW (score: 1): Author: Peter Laws <plaws@plaws.net>; Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2004 12:58:25 -0500 (CDT); Yeah, what's up with that? I'd not noticed that phenomena since I got back into RTTY contesting back in January. Quite annoying. It's as if the stations were just calling whatever callsign printed fi; /archives//html/RTTY/2004-09/msg00245.html (7,911 bytes)
57. Re: [RTTY] Zone 4 (score: 1): Author: Peter Laws <plaws@plaws.net>; Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2004 12:59:44 -0500 (CDT); N1MM Logger seems to do this. Noticed it the first time this weekend. I assumed it was pulling the whole exchange out of the rx buffer, but evidently not. -- 73, Peter Laws N5UWY/9 WAC (phone) WAS #5; /archives//html/RTTY/2004-09/msg00246.html (7,558 bytes)
58. Re: [RTTY] QSO B4 (score: 1): Author: Peter Laws <plaws@plaws.net>; Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2004 13:04:26 -0500 (CDT); Many stations seem to have me in their logs as N5UW or N9UWY/9 no matter how many times I re-rend the call, so don't feel *too* bad. :-) A write-up in NCJ about working dupes would be a good start, b; /archives//html/RTTY/2004-09/msg00247.html (7,151 bytes)
59. Re: [RTTY] LOTW (score: 1): Author: Peter Laws <plaws@plaws.net>; Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 11:22:06 -0500 (CDT); Even though they are digitally signed? Gee, I thought that would impress folks way more than the cards. :-) -- 73, Peter Laws N5UWY/9 WAC (phone) WAS #51466 (SSB) ____________________________________; /archives//html/RTTY/2004-09/msg00340.html (8,038 bytes)
60. Re: [RTTY] 2004 CQ/RJ WW RTTY - Claimed Scores 29Sep2004 (score: 1): Author: Peter Laws <plaws@plaws.net>; Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 16:23:51 -0500 (CDT); ????? -- 73, Peter Laws N5UWY/9 WAC (phone) WAS #51466 (SSB) _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty; /archives//html/RTTY/2004-09/msg00353.html (6,878 bytes)

Current List: 41 - 60
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] [17] [18] [19] [20]