Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:plaws@plaws.net: 430 ]

Total 430 documents matching your query.

381. Re: [RTTY] rRe: With XP support ending... (score: 1)
Author: Peter Laws <plaws@plaws.net>
Date: Thu, 9 Jan 2014 10:08:39 -0600
You are certainly free to be offended, but I assure you that there are people that do just that ... -- Peter Laws | N5UWY | plaws plaws net | Travel by Train! ________________________________________
/archives//html/RTTY/2014-01/msg00212.html (9,352 bytes)

382. Re: [RTTY] Band plans (score: 1)
Author: Peter Laws <plaws@plaws.net>
Date: Thu, 9 Jan 2014 14:25:13 -0600
Listing "Data" isn't helpful. The "watering holes" are well known but mostly to the participants. The only ones I know to avoid are the PSKers at 14070 plus a few (and similar numbers on other bands)
/archives//html/RTTY/2014-01/msg00215.html (8,821 bytes)

383. Re: [RTTY] RM-11708 Comments on Comments period (score: 1)
Author: Peter Laws <plaws@plaws.net>
Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2014 23:00:03 -0600
Me too neither ... BUT ... on the search page, there is an "export to XLS" button. The resulting spreadsheet has all 918 comments (so far) and there is a column for "Name of Filer", but not for their
/archives//html/RTTY/2014-01/msg00247.html (8,861 bytes)

384. Re: [RTTY] January 19th: Revenge of the Sith (score: 1)
Author: Peter Laws <plaws@plaws.net>
Date: Sun, 19 Jan 2014 11:13:22 -0600
Here's what I sent Kay in 2010 on the occasion of her first election: ``Congratulations! ``Now, keep all those men in Newington in line. :-) ``73, Peter N5UWY LM, VE, etc'' I hope she didn't think I
/archives//html/RTTY/2014-01/msg00297.html (8,123 bytes)

385. Re: [RTTY] January 19th: Revenge of the Sith (score: 1)
Author: Peter Laws <plaws@plaws.net>
Date: Sun, 19 Jan 2014 13:22:36 -0600
As Ben pointed out, the release has been updated in the last two hours to include mention of answers to FAQs about RM-11708. -- Peter Laws | N5UWY | plaws plaws net | Travel by Train! _______________
/archives//html/RTTY/2014-01/msg00301.html (7,899 bytes)

386. Re: [RTTY] Rm11708 (score: 1)
Author: Peter Laws <plaws@plaws.net>
Date: Sun, 19 Jan 2014 17:32:04 -0600
Doesn't even need much updating 11 years later. Well, except Pactor 4 making things even worse. -- Peter Laws | N5UWY | plaws plaws net | Travel by Train! ____________________________________________
/archives//html/RTTY/2014-01/msg00306.html (7,617 bytes)

387. [RTTY] Fwd: [MMTTY] Canada Gets 60 Meter Channels (score: 1)
Author: Peter Laws <plaws@plaws.net>
Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2014 06:56:18 -0600
Look! Our old friend, 2.8 kHz! :-) Efective January 2014, Canadian Amateur operators are permitted to operate on five frequency channels in the 60 meter band. Industry Canada has granted Amateur Radi
/archives//html/RTTY/2014-01/msg00322.html (8,754 bytes)

388. Re: [RTTY] RTTY RM 11708 in ARRL BOD (score: 1)
Author: Peter Laws <plaws@plaws.net>
Date: Sat, 25 Jan 2014 15:52:48 -0600
Don't think so. More like "use a static link because if you use the CMS we spent too much money on, and that doesn't do the job, we'll never be able to find it again". -- Peter Laws | N5UWY | plaws p
/archives//html/RTTY/2014-01/msg00345.html (7,793 bytes)

389. Re: [RTTY] FT5ZM RTTY is a zoo (score: 1)
Author: Peter Laws <plaws@plaws.net>
Date: Sun, 2 Feb 2014 17:18:12 -0600
Not sure it's RTTY ops. Certainly it's ops who don't know what "split" means. What's really funny is that some of these guys think they've worked him and send 599 back! Also, who is UP? He seems to b
/archives//html/RTTY/2014-02/msg00020.html (8,806 bytes)

390. Re: [RTTY] FT5ZM RTTY is a zoo (score: 1)
Author: Peter Laws <plaws@plaws.net>
Date: Sun, 2 Feb 2014 17:19:39 -0600
YM BWHY ARE EXTRAS SUCH DUMB ASSES /&h& M VM B,-5Q UP UPUP UP UP UP YOU IDIOP -- Peter Laws | N5UWY | plaws plaws net | Travel by Train! _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing l
/archives//html/RTTY/2014-02/msg00021.html (7,978 bytes)

391. Re: [RTTY] FT5ZM RTTY is a zoo (score: 1)
Author: Peter Laws <plaws@plaws.net>
Date: Sun, 2 Feb 2014 17:50:55 -0600
6 LANDERS ARE IDIOTS !!!!5WRD Certainly true of N6UK who not only doesn't know how to use his split button, but also has defective keying and never mind all the linefeeds at the end of his call. -- P
/archives//html/RTTY/2014-02/msg00024.html (10,224 bytes)

392. Re: [RTTY] FT5ZM RTTY is a zoo (score: 1)
Author: Peter Laws <plaws@plaws.net>
Date: Sun, 2 Feb 2014 17:53:19 -0600
K4MQL K4MQL K4MQL Some 4s, too. Yes, I'm doing this to shame them. -- Peter Laws | N5UWY | plaws plaws net | Travel by Train! _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@co
/archives//html/RTTY/2014-02/msg00025.html (10,596 bytes)

393. Re: [RTTY] FT5ZM RTTY is a zoo (score: 1)
Author: Peter Laws <plaws@plaws.net>
Date: Sun, 2 Feb 2014 19:04:04 -0600
There's a difference between someone calling on top of the DX, being reminded that the DX is split and someone who calls and calls and calls. Or the ones that think the DX worked them and send the DX
/archives//html/RTTY/2014-02/msg00030.html (9,954 bytes)

394. Re: [RTTY] FT5ZM RTTY is a zoo (score: 1)
Author: Peter Laws <plaws@plaws.net>
Date: Mon, 3 Feb 2014 09:50:29 -0600
What? No! They generate entity credits! :-) Aside from not actually being able to work them from N5UWY, this isn't much different than some of the other big ones. Split isn't the problem - it means y
/archives//html/RTTY/2014-02/msg00049.html (9,133 bytes)

395. Re: [RTTY] Change in pileup procedure? (score: 1)
Author: Peter Laws <plaws@plaws.net>
Date: Mon, 3 Feb 2014 12:38:18 -0600
Totally uncomplicated. :-) *I* don't think that will work - it just means a mobile pile-up as the DX moves around since most of The Deserving (especially the ones that only work RTTY for the greenie)
/archives//html/RTTY/2014-02/msg00056.html (7,687 bytes)

396. Re: [RTTY] Change in pileup procedure? (mobile) de VE9AA (score: 1)
Author: Peter Laws <plaws@plaws.net>
Date: Tue, 4 Feb 2014 16:19:24 -0600
Blah, blah, blah, DX, shmeeX ... I want to hear more about 160 m mobile from the Mini!!!! :-D Do you use that antenna in the image you linked? What kind of tuner? -- Peter Laws | N5UWY | plaws plaws
/archives//html/RTTY/2014-02/msg00080.html (7,905 bytes)

397. Re: [RTTY] change in pile up procedure (score: 1)
Author: Peter Laws <plaws@plaws.net>
Date: Wed, 5 Feb 2014 11:07:06 -0600
Me too and the UP UP is actually helpful (though not hearing the hordes calling should have been my first clue). Then there are those that call and call and call and call on the DX freq no matter how
/archives//html/RTTY/2014-02/msg00112.html (7,648 bytes)

398. Re: [RTTY] Change in pileup procedure? (score: 1)
Author: Peter Laws <plaws@plaws.net>
Date: Wed, 5 Feb 2014 11:27:09 -0600
One of my elmers, Woody, K5GOE, got 5BDXCC all with 100 W and wire antennas. I'm trying to do the same (got 15 and 20 and getting close on 10 - don't ask about 40 and 80!). I get a lot of credits fro
/archives//html/RTTY/2014-02/msg00115.html (10,820 bytes)

399. Re: [RTTY] Frequency skew (score: 1)
Author: Peter Laws <plaws@plaws.net>
Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2014 17:46:21 -0600
A HA! I'm glad you posted this. I thought there was a config issue at N5UWY! This is about the only contest in which I use spotting assistance so usually it's just random DX. With the latter, if it's
/archives//html/RTTY/2014-02/msg00194.html (8,100 bytes)

400. Re: [RTTY] [CQ-Contest] LoTW confirmation rates (score: 1)
Author: Peter Laws <plaws@plaws.net>
Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2014 14:22:16 -0600
As long as you can fish for QSLs with it I'm not interested. Otherwise it's fine. I have, waiting for me to do something about them, 1331 "eQSLs" waiting in my inbox. One of them is from a 4Z. It's b
/archives//html/RTTY/2014-02/msg00210.html (8,909 bytes)

Current List: 381 - 400
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] [17] [18] [19] [20]
This search system is powered by Namazu