Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:plaws@plaws.net: 430 ]

Total 430 documents matching your query.

341. Re: [RTTY] ARRL attack on current RTTY users (score: 1)
Author: Peter Laws <plaws@plaws.net>
Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2013 15:27:07 -0600
It's contrary to the rules. Many of you haven't filled out an FCC Form 610 (and probably don't know that it's almost always an NCVEC Form 605) so probably have no idea that when you apply for a licen
/archives//html/RTTY/2013-11/msg00124.html (10,624 bytes)

342. Re: [RTTY] ARRL attack on current RTTY users (score: 1)
Author: Peter Laws <plaws@plaws.net>
Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2013 15:39:54 -0600
All QST issues are available online to ARRL members. All issues of 73 are also online. _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.co
/archives//html/RTTY/2013-11/msg00125.html (8,719 bytes)

343. Re: [RTTY] How to File Comments on RM-11708 (score: 1)
Author: Peter Laws <plaws@plaws.net>
Date: Fri, 29 Nov 2013 11:54:36 -0600
So what you are saying is that people can no longer whine about it being "too hard"! :-) Nice work (seriously). I have, Three times. Clever people could actually look up what I said about restructuri
/archives//html/RTTY/2013-11/msg00351.html (8,287 bytes)

344. Re: [RTTY] ARRL attack on current RTTY users (score: 1)
Author: Peter Laws <plaws@plaws.net>
Date: Fri, 29 Nov 2013 12:34:21 -0600
Apologies if this gets covered in subsequent posts -- I put off digging into these threads until the holiday break (hope you all had a happy Thanksgiving!). I find a lot of the folks that attend thes
/archives//html/RTTY/2013-11/msg00352.html (12,563 bytes)

345. Re: [RTTY] ARRL attack on current RTTY users (score: 1)
Author: Peter Laws <plaws@plaws.net>
Date: Fri, 29 Nov 2013 12:49:27 -0600
Just some sort of computing device (which may well be "free") but it also requires payment of a monthly fee to a provider. For ever. -- Peter Laws | N5UWY | plaws plaws net | Travel by Train! _______
/archives//html/RTTY/2013-11/msg00353.html (10,298 bytes)

346. Re: [RTTY] ARRL attack on current RTTY users (score: 1)
Author: Peter Laws <plaws@plaws.net>
Date: Fri, 29 Nov 2013 13:23:15 -0600
Above 30 MHz, go for it. The problem is below that point. I wonder, though, if there is actually a situation where spreadsheets of information can be gathered yet comms are still down. -- Peter Laws
/archives//html/RTTY/2013-11/msg00355.html (10,644 bytes)

347. Re: [RTTY] ARRL attack on current RTTY users (score: 1)
Author: Peter Laws <plaws@plaws.net>
Date: Fri, 29 Nov 2013 13:42:37 -0600
Call it "de facto encrypted". In the world above 50 MHz, there are similar issues. The D-STAR *protocol* is open but the voice is encoded and decoded by a proprietary algorithm in a DVSI chip. The sa
/archives//html/RTTY/2013-11/msg00357.html (11,077 bytes)

348. [RTTY] eCFR listing of Part 97 (score: 1)
Author: Peter Laws <plaws@plaws.net>
Date: Fri, 29 Nov 2013 15:13:24 -0600
This is a link (that will probably break) that should take you to the most current version of 47 CFR 97. http://www.ecfr.gov/cgi-bin/text-idx?SID=9417e52ab593090eb4f9a10459aa77e1&node=47:5.0.1.1.6&rg
/archives//html/RTTY/2013-11/msg00361.html (6,899 bytes)

349. Re: [RTTY] RM-11708 has been amended. (score: 1)
Author: Peter Laws <plaws@plaws.net>
Date: Fri, 29 Nov 2013 16:24:05 -0600
The original post made me look up the bandwidth, too, on my now out of production IC746Pro and it's 2.8 kHz on SSB Phone. "2.2 kHz is too narrow!" Kidding. Carry on. -- Peter Laws | N5UWY | plaws pla
/archives//html/RTTY/2013-11/msg00366.html (7,495 bytes)

350. Re: [RTTY] RM-11708 has been amended. (score: 1)
Author: Peter Laws <plaws@plaws.net>
Date: Fri, 29 Nov 2013 17:52:44 -0600
I'm sure 2.8 kHz (or wider!) is common on current rigs but regardless, we need to limit the bandwidth SOMEwhere and from the traffic here, 2.2 kHz seems a good place to stop. -- Peter Laws | N5UWY |
/archives//html/RTTY/2013-11/msg00368.html (8,102 bytes)

351. Re: [RTTY] Hints and tips on how to file comments on RM-11708 (score: 1)
Author: Peter Laws <plaws@plaws.net>
Date: Fri, 29 Nov 2013 17:58:52 -0600
Is that the one entitled ``The American Radio Relay League Report of the ARRL Narrowband Study Committee 2010 Second Meeting''? If so, it's here: http://www.arrl.org/files/file/About%20ARRL/Committee
/archives//html/RTTY/2013-11/msg00369.html (10,320 bytes)

352. Re: [RTTY] Hints and tips on how to file comments on RM-11708 (score: 1)
Author: Peter Laws <plaws@plaws.net>
Date: Sat, 30 Nov 2013 09:27:45 -0600
RR TNX -- Peter Laws | N5UWY | plaws plaws net | Travel by Train! _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rt
/archives//html/RTTY/2013-11/msg00374.html (10,070 bytes)

353. Re: [RTTY] What REAL contesters should use (score: 1)
Author: Peter Laws <plaws@plaws.net>
Date: Fri, 6 Dec 2013 10:41:54 -0600
I see the setup includes an Illudium Q-36 Modulator. Must have been noisy in there given the motor-generator and the TTYs themselves! -- Peter Laws | N5UWY | plaws plaws net | Travel by Train! ______
/archives//html/RTTY/2013-12/msg00025.html (7,122 bytes)

354. Re: [RTTY] [MMTTY] RE: [digitalradio] Why (and How) You Should Urge the FCC to Reject the ARRL's Symbol Rate Petition (score: 1)
Author: Peter Laws <plaws@plaws.net>
Date: Sun, 8 Dec 2013 18:12:43 -0600
Control link, eh? Are the sailors claiming that the station at the other end is controlling the remote station? Because if that's the case, then the person remotely controlling the distant station is
/archives//html/RTTY/2013-12/msg00045.html (9,659 bytes)

355. Re: [RTTY] RM-11708, the "other side" (score: 1)
Author: Peter Laws <plaws@plaws.net>
Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2013 10:17:20 -0600
Here we go. "We need it for disasters!" Unlikely, but let's pretend. How long does it take to send a 1 kB message with the proprietary Pactor 3 protocol (or name your poison)? How long does it take t
/archives//html/RTTY/2013-12/msg00058.html (8,994 bytes)

356. Re: [RTTY] RM-11708, the "other side" (score: 1)
Author: Peter Laws <plaws@plaws.net>
Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2013 16:54:55 -0600
Oh, me too! There are WAY too many wannabe law enforcement/firefighter/paramedic/dispatcher wannabes already who truly believe that when The Big One hits that all the public safety and commercial com
/archives//html/RTTY/2013-12/msg00076.html (11,953 bytes)

357. Re: [RTTY] One more thought on emergency comm (score: 1)
Author: Peter Laws <plaws@plaws.net>
Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2013 11:34:32 -0600
Interestingly, about 10 years ago, the ARC lovely Suburban-type vehicles with every imaginable radio, plus generators and appropriate antennas including satellite Saw one up in Illinois. Would *love*
/archives//html/RTTY/2013-12/msg00083.html (8,098 bytes)

358. Re: [RTTY] [N1MM] CQ Magazine (score: 1)
Author: Peter Laws <plaws@plaws.net>
Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2013 17:59:06 -0600
Oooh, that would be bad. I only pick it up occasionally, but it's important for QST to have competition. The also publish Popular Communications. I'll ask my scanner buds. -- Peter Laws | N5UWY | pla
/archives//html/RTTY/2013-12/msg00092.html (7,692 bytes)

359. Re: [RTTY] CQ Magazine (score: 1)
Author: Peter Laws <plaws@plaws.net>
Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2013 18:40:20 -0600
I know little about the publishing biz, but I wonder if the digital issue is part of the problem? No advertising revenue, no magazine. That much I know. But the question is, do digital ads bring in a
/archives//html/RTTY/2013-12/msg00094.html (7,979 bytes)

360. Re: [RTTY] CQ Magazine (score: 1)
Author: Peter Laws <plaws@plaws.net>
Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2013 12:32:38 -0600
Doesn't really mean anything until we hear what is going on. If they do fold, I hope another group takes up sponsorship of both the awards and the contests. -- Peter Laws | N5UWY | plaws plaws net |
/archives//html/RTTY/2013-12/msg00106.html (7,632 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu