Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:plaws@plaws.net: 430 ]

Total 430 documents matching your query.

241. Re: [RTTY] Come on, Why bother? (score: 1)
Author: Peter Laws <plaws@plaws.net>
Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2011 14:59:31 -0600
He was running, I was S&P. It was his macro. Makes no sense to me. -- Peter Laws | N5UWY | plaws plaws net | Travel by Train! _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@co
/archives//html/RTTY/2011-01/msg00347.html (9,056 bytes)

242. Re: [RTTY] CQ or QRZ (score: 1)
Author: Peter Laws <plaws@plaws.net>
Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2011 15:24:28 -0600
No, no, Bill. I'm being told that making your macros as efficient as possible, both to increase your own score, and as a courtesy to others, is wrong. In fact, "73 GL" is considered by some to be rud
/archives//html/RTTY/2011-01/msg00394.html (9,138 bytes)

243. Re: [RTTY] The perfect delay for run CQ? (score: 1)
Author: Peter Laws <plaws@plaws.net>
Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2011 20:45:13 -0600
100 W to wire here, too. I did have it at 4.3 seconds but dropped it to 3.5 s. Peter -- Peter Laws | N5UWY | plaws plaws net | Travel by Train! _______________________________________________ RTTY ma
/archives//html/RTTY/2011-01/msg00407.html (6,933 bytes)

244. Re: [RTTY] Why send 599 report (score: 1)
Author: Peter Laws <plaws@plaws.net>
Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2011 11:48:18 -0600
I'm all for abolishing RST in contests but only if it's replaced with something else. I really like the ARRL Sweepstakes exchange. One of the BARTG test uses time, which I also like. -- Peter Laws |
/archives//html/RTTY/2011-01/msg00433.html (7,506 bytes)

245. Re: [RTTY] Why send 599 report (score: 1)
Author: Peter Laws <plaws@plaws.net>
Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2011 16:45:47 -0600
You're confusing two things, perhaps on purpose. Whether an exchange includes one piece of information (other than callsign) like RTTY RU or 4 like SS has nothing to do with how efficiently that info
/archives//html/RTTY/2011-01/msg00454.html (8,728 bytes)

246. Re: [RTTY] Why send 599 report (score: 1)
Author: Peter Laws <plaws@plaws.net>
Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2011 13:10:48 -0600
1) Everyone's setup is different and 2) few radios follow the "Collins Standard" (50 uV at the antenna terminals) ... or any other standard! Even if everyone had similar stations and all RSSIs met so
/archives//html/RTTY/2011-01/msg00485.html (9,398 bytes)

247. Re: [RTTY] Why send 599 report (score: 1)
Author: Peter Laws <plaws@plaws.net>
Date: Sat, 15 Jan 2011 11:41:05 -0600
That would be fitting since, like RST in a contest, most data transmitted from a smart phone is worthless. -- Peter Laws | N5UWY | plaws plaws net | Travel by Train! _________________________________
/archives//html/RTTY/2011-01/msg00531.html (9,536 bytes)

248. Re: [RTTY] Grid Squares (score: 1)
Author: Peter Laws <plaws@plaws.net>
Date: Sun, 16 Jan 2011 10:39:26 -0600
Hello? Makrothen? Has everyone forgotten that one? The sponsors of that contest have wisely dropped the meaningless contest RST and use only the 4-char grid loc as the exchange. They've made that hig
/archives//html/RTTY/2011-01/msg00567.html (8,140 bytes)

249. Re: [RTTY] This weekends Contest (BARTG SPRINT) (score: 1)
Author: Peter Laws <plaws@plaws.net>
Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2011 11:23:47 -0600
I have never had this problem. :-) -- Peter Laws | N5UWY | plaws plaws net | Travel by Train! _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http://lists.contes
/archives//html/RTTY/2011-01/msg00634.html (9,565 bytes)

250. Re: [RTTY] 4 port serail port PCI board? (score: 1)
Author: Peter Laws <plaws@plaws.net>
Date: Fri, 4 Feb 2011 22:04:22 -0600
Siig. Got it off eBay years ago. Works FB. -- Peter Laws | N5UWY | plaws plaws net | Travel by Train! _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http://list
/archives//html/RTTY/2011-02/msg00013.html (7,756 bytes)

251. Re: [RTTY] VP8ORK 20m Yesterday (score: 1)
Author: Peter Laws <plaws@plaws.net>
Date: Tue, 8 Feb 2011 08:59:27 -0600
I haven't made a DOS-based QSO since college in the 1990s. WF1B and a PK232 (and a DSP 599ZX, I think, whichever regenerated RTTY tones) were a hot setup, particularly with the Drake L4-B amp, but MM
/archives//html/RTTY/2011-02/msg00040.html (7,347 bytes)

252. Re: [RTTY] K or carriage return (score: 1)
Author: Peter Laws <plaws@plaws.net>
Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2011 11:39:16 -0600
I still don't get why the issue of making your own macros as efficient as possible is a controversial topic. Why *wouldn't* you want to be efficient? As seen above, seconds mean QSOs and for some sta
/archives//html/RTTY/2011-02/msg00137.html (9,071 bytes)

253. Re: [RTTY] K or carriage return (score: 1)
Author: Peter Laws <plaws@plaws.net>
Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2011 14:00:13 -0600
You're mistaking speed for efficiency. 75-baud would be way faster, but if everyone else is set to 45.45-baud, it's not very efficient. Sure, you can skip the various spaces or CRs in the various pla
/archives//html/RTTY/2011-02/msg00149.html (9,142 bytes)

254. Re: [RTTY] Nice Score Summary? (score: 1)
Author: Peter Laws <plaws@plaws.net>
Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2011 08:44:30 -0600
In N1MM, under the help menu, there is an item that will take you directly to the site - "Report Score to 3830" or something. Sadly, it doesn't fill in any of the fields for you. :-) -- Peter Laws |
/archives//html/RTTY/2011-02/msg00196.html (8,371 bytes)

255. Re: [RTTY] Which logger sends "Now <nextcall>..." (score: 1)
Author: Peter Laws <plaws@plaws.net>
Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2011 14:44:55 -0600
So THAT'S how ESM works! Great videos - kudos to K8UT. -- Peter Laws | N5UWY | plaws plaws net | Travel by Train! _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com
/archives//html/RTTY/2011-02/msg00206.html (9,199 bytes)

256. Re: [RTTY] RST/RPT Separator (score: 1)
Author: Peter Laws <plaws@plaws.net>
Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2011 15:34:56 -0600
We've discussed this many times. A dash is better for RST+NR while a space is better for RST+QTH (or name or other non-numerical exchange) since dash is in the FIGS case so that you save the shift ch
/archives//html/RTTY/2011-02/msg00251.html (7,522 bytes)

257. Re: [RTTY] K or carriage return (score: 1)
Author: Peter Laws <plaws@plaws.net>
Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2011 16:01:08 -0600
Move the CQ to the end so that folks know you're CQing: WPX AB2ZY AB2ZY CQ Same length as what you ended up with, but better since the other guy needn't wait as long if he catches you after the WPX.
/archives//html/RTTY/2011-02/msg00256.html (9,168 bytes)

258. Re: [RTTY] TJ9PF now QRT (score: 1)
Author: Peter Laws <plaws@plaws.net>
Date: Sun, 20 Feb 2011 14:31:42 -0600
I was not on the ball with this one - only got them on 17 and 30, both RTTY though. -- Peter Laws | N5UWY | plaws plaws net | Travel by Train! _______________________________________________ RTTY mai
/archives//html/RTTY/2011-02/msg00305.html (7,436 bytes)

259. Re: [RTTY] RTTY Newbie and brag files (score: 1)
Author: Peter Laws <plaws@plaws.net>
Date: Tue, 1 Mar 2011 18:22:00 -0600
I used to have one until this came up on this list last time (2 years ago, maybe?). Deleted it then and there. In fairness, it didn't get used a lot. I mostly do contests, where I need that "useless"
/archives//html/RTTY/2011-03/msg00034.html (9,220 bytes)

260. Re: [RTTY] Logging Software Used in 2010 CQ WW RTTY Contest (score: 1)
Author: Peter Laws <plaws@plaws.net>
Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2011 10:49:00 -0600
Are you kidding me? Three people used *CT* and no one used WF1B??? Perhaps the WF1B users are hiding here: -- Peter Laws | N5UWY | plaws plaws net | Travel by Train! _________________________________
/archives//html/RTTY/2011-03/msg00059.html (7,637 bytes)

Current List: 241 - 260
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] [17] [18] [19] [20]
This search system is powered by Namazu