Mail Archive Search: <+from:pcooper@guernsey.net>

Results:

References: [ +from:pcooper@guernsey.net: 847 ]

Total 847 documents matching your query.

361. Re: [RTTY] Answering CQ's (score: 1): Author: "Phil Cooper" <pcooper@guernsey.net>; Date: Mon, 2 Oct 2006 18:27:50 +0100; Hello Tom and the group............ I think the simple answer is to use No2! There are a couple of instances where No1 should be used: 1.....When there is more than one station on a frequency, and yo; /archives//html/RTTY/2006-10/msg00042.html (11,106 bytes)
362. [RTTY] OD5YY QSL confirmed! (score: 1): Author: "Phil Cooper" <pcooper@guernsey.net>; Date: Mon, 2 Oct 2006 18:52:38 +0100; Hi all, Got home today and found a QSL card from OD5YY! It is for a 40m RTTY contact 2 years ago, and the card was sent just after the QSO! Despite the long delay, I am pleased to have received this; /archives//html/RTTY/2006-10/msg00043.html (6,822 bytes)
363. [RTTY] VK2SG RTTY DX NOTES RTDX1012 (score: 1): Author: "Phil Cooper" <pcooper@guernsey.net>; Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2006 22:12:24 +0100; RTDX1012 RTTY DX VK2SG RTTY DX NOTES for week ending 12 October (BID RTDX1012) Our information this week came from AA5AU, I5FLN, DJ3IW, UT5RP, GB7DXG and the OH2AQ DX Summit. Thank you all. Bandpass; /archives//html/RTTY/2006-10/msg00100.html (13,927 bytes)
364. [RTTY] GU0SUP Makrothen (score: 1): Author: "Phil Cooper" <pcooper@guernsey.net>; Date: Sun, 15 Oct 2006 18:20:16 +0100; Hello all, I missed the first section totally, due to being rather tired. However, I was there at the start of the 2nd section, but conditions were very poor, so not too much from me there. The 3rd s; /archives//html/RTTY/2006-10/msg00157.html (7,786 bytes)
365. [RTTY] Conditions (score: 1): Author: "Phil Cooper" <pcooper@guernsey.net>; Date: Sat, 14 Oct 2006 19:22:44 +0100; Hi all, Wow, this is hard work! Who pinched the propagation?? Working ON/PA/DL on 20m, which is NOT a good sign! 73 de Phil GU0SUP _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RT; /archives//html/RTTY/2006-10/msg00158.html (6,460 bytes)
366. [RTTY] GU0SUP Makrothen (score: 1): Author: "Phil Cooper" <pcooper@guernsey.net>; Date: Sun, 15 Oct 2006 21:13:59 +0100; Hello all, I missed the first section totally, due to being rather tired. However, I was there at the start of the 2nd section, but conditions were very poor, so not too much from me there. The 3rd s; /archives//html/RTTY/2006-10/msg00163.html (7,725 bytes)
367. [RTTY] GU0SUP JARTS 2006 SOABLP (score: 1): Author: "Phil Cooper" <pcooper@guernsey.net>; Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2006 18:05:06 +0100; Hello all, Well, better conditions that for the Makrothen, which helped! However, I woke up on Saturday morning with a migraine style headache, and could not shift it. This rather affected my desire; /archives//html/RTTY/2006-10/msg00306.html (9,045 bytes)
368. [WriteLog] JARTS log submission (score: 1): Author: "Phil Cooper" <pcooper@guernsey.net>; Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2006 18:05:07 +0100; Hi all, After reading the comments, I changed my Writelog-produced Cabrillo file to GU0SUP.CBR. This was accepted first time by the log cruncher, and I got a number. I cannot see how the page will ch; /archives//html/RTTY/2006-10/msg00307.html (7,843 bytes)
369. [RTTY] WAEDC contest coming up! (score: 1): Author: "Phil Cooper" <pcooper@guernsey.net>; Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2006 20:09:32 +0100; Hi all, I know we have only just finished with JARTS, and there may be some still struggling to get their logs uploaded to the JARTS website, but WAEDC will be upon us in a couple of weeks, so now is; /archives//html/RTTY/2006-10/msg00367.html (7,552 bytes)
370. Re: [RTTY] QTC IN WAE RTTY (score: 1): Author: "Phil Cooper" <pcooper@guernsey.net>; Date: Thu, 2 Nov 2006 18:32:56 -0000; Hello Noel andd the group, Yes, Barry is correct, there is NO weighting for the QTC's, only for the mults. I re-checked the rules, and cannot see where this idea may have come from. It doesn't even r; /archives//html/RTTY/2006-11/msg00004.html (7,836 bytes)
371. [RTTY] RTTY spots?? (score: 1): Author: "Phil Cooper" <pcooper@guernsey.net>; Date: Wed, 8 Nov 2006 20:15:13 -0000; Hi all, Maybe it is because I am compiling the VK2SG RTTY notes this week, or maybe not, but there seems to be rather a lot of spots with RTTY shown as a comment that are actually on PSK frequencies.; /archives//html/RTTY/2006-11/msg00046.html (6,773 bytes)
372. [RTTY] VK2SG RTTY DX NOTES RTDX1109 (score: 1): Author: "Phil Cooper" <pcooper@guernsey.net>; Date: Thu, 9 Nov 2006 22:05:05 -0000; RTDX1109 RTTY DX VK2SG RTTY DX NOTES for week ending 09 November (BID RTDX1109) Our information this week came from AA5AU, I5FLN, DJ3IW, UT5RP, GB7DXG and the OH2AQ DX Summit. Thank you all. Bandpass; /archives//html/RTTY/2006-11/msg00053.html (13,436 bytes)
373. [RTTY] GU0SUP WAEDC RTTY (SOABLP) (score: 1): Author: "Phil Cooper" <pcooper@guernsey.net>; Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2006 18:30:59 -0000; Hello all, Hhhmmm! What happened to the propagation on Saturday? Got up around 0600, expecting to be able to work some DX on 80m, but all I found were half-a-dozen EU stations, and all were hard to w; /archives//html/RTTY/2006-11/msg00075.html (9,133 bytes)
374. [RTTY] VK2SG RTTY DX NOTES RTDX1207 (score: 1): Author: "Phil Cooper" <pcooper@guernsey.net>; Date: Thu, 7 Dec 2006 20:55:44 -0000; RTDXMMDD RTTY DX VK2SG RTTY DX NOTES for week ending 07 December (BID RTDX1207) Our information this week came from AA5AU, I5FLN, DJ3IW, GB7DXG and the OH2AQ DX Summit. Thank you all. Bandpass Friday; /archives//html/RTTY/2006-12/msg00028.html (12,824 bytes)
375. [RTTY] Correction to RTDX1207 (score: 1): Author: "Phil Cooper" <pcooper@guernsey.net>; Date: Sat, 9 Dec 2006 17:20:31 -0000; RTDX1207 RTTY DX VK2SG RTTY DX NOTES for week ending 07 December (BID RTDX1207) - CORRECTION Apologies for the wrong date given for the OKDX RTTY Contest. The actual date for the contest is Saturday; /archives//html/RTTY/2006-12/msg00032.html (7,294 bytes)
376. [RTTY] OKDX Cabrillo ??? (score: 1): Author: "Phil Cooper" <pcooper@guernsey.net>; Date: Sat, 16 Dec 2006 22:16:06 -0000; Hi all, As the bands are in such poor shape here, I am just sorting out my log, and when I try to generate a Cabrillo file, I get a little box come up with the following: Toggle QSL &Received record; /archives//html/RTTY/2006-12/msg00087.html (6,716 bytes)
377. [RTTY] Re the OK Cabrillo (score: 1): Author: "Phil Cooper" <pcooper@guernsey.net>; Date: Sun, 17 Dec 2006 13:59:06 -0000; Hi all, Yes, I know the rules state that they want logs per band, but I am fairly sure that I submitted a Cabrillo log last year as well. Also, WL 10.55D did generate a Cabrillo log, but 10.61 will n; /archives//html/RTTY/2006-12/msg00091.html (6,780 bytes)
378. [RTTY] OKDX RTTY - GU0SUP SOABLP (score: 1): Author: "Phil Cooper" <pcooper@guernsey.net>; Date: Sun, 17 Dec 2006 15:33:06 -0000; Hi all, and Seasons Greetings, Only a part-time effort from me, in between household chores, shopping and various other commitments. With conditions the way there were, I am not surprised at the lowe; /archives//html/RTTY/2006-12/msg00094.html (7,676 bytes)
379. [RTTY] GU0SUP SARTG HNY (SOABLP) (score: 1): Author: "Phil Cooper" <pcooper@guernsey.net>; Date: Mon, 1 Jan 2007 14:15:53 -0000; Happy New Year everyone! I almost got there at the start, but missed it by a few minutes. No matter. Started on 80m, and was surprised to hear N1UZ (I think) and then K4GMH despite the fact that it w; /archives//html/RTTY/2007-01/msg00004.html (6,972 bytes)
380. [RTTY] VK2SG RTTY DX NOTES RTDX0401 (score: 1): Author: "Phil Cooper" <pcooper@guernsey.net>; Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2007 21:18:12 -0000; RTDX0104 RTTY DX VK2SG RTTY DX NOTES for week ending 04 January (BID RTDX0401) . . * * . . . . . * 2 0 0 7 * . * . . * . . * * * * * . . * *==* *. . * . * . * . . . . . * . * . * . *. *. . * . . . .; /archives//html/RTTY/2007-01/msg00028.html (17,571 bytes)

Current List: 361 - 380
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] [17] [18] [19] [20]