Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:n2ki@amsat.org: 55 ]

Total 55 documents matching your query.

1. [RTTY] N2KI - SOSB/20 LP (score: 1)
Author: "Anthony (N2KI)" <n2ki@amsat.org>
Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2005 07:50:34 -0400
Hi fellas, Glad to see a bunch of the diehards in the contest as well as many new members to RTTY contesting. My current situation only allows me to single band operating. Band conditions appeared to
/archives//html/RTTY/2005-09/msg00159.html (7,214 bytes)

2. [RTTY] Off Topic - RTTY LOtW (score: 1)
Author: "Anthony (N2KI)" <n2ki@amsat.org>
Date: Fri, 7 Oct 2005 07:02:52 -0400
Sorry for the off topic. Does anyone here use LOtW? Please reply off the reflector. Thanks ** SYSOP - N2KI DX CLUSTER dxc.n2ki.com:7300 RF Gateway 145.650 Website: www.n2ki.com DX Spoken Here _______
/archives//html/RTTY/2005-10/msg00056.html (6,317 bytes)

3. Re: [RTTY] Off Topic - RTTY LOtW (score: 1)
Author: "A.J.C." <n2ki@amsat.org>
Date: Fri, 7 Oct 2005 09:19:15 -0400
Questions answered. Thanks to those who replied. ** SYSOP - N2KI DX CLUSTER dxc.n2ki.com:7300 RF Gateway 145.650 Website: www.n2ki.com DX Spoken Here _______________________________________________ R
/archives//html/RTTY/2005-10/msg00057.html (7,428 bytes)

4. [RTTY] Sprint - This Evening (score: 1)
Author: "Anthony (N2KI)" <n2ki@amsat.org>
Date: Sat, 8 Oct 2005 08:17:41 -0400
Does anyone know which selection in WF1B corresponds to tonight's contest? Thanks ** SYSOP - N2KI DX CLUSTER dxc.n2ki.com:7300 RF Gateway 145.650 Website: www.n2ki.com DX Spoken Here ________________
/archives//html/RTTY/2005-10/msg00066.html (6,340 bytes)

5. Re: [RTTY] pcpakratt II (score: 1)
Author: "Anthony (N2KI)" <n2ki@amsat.org>
Date: Wed, 2 Nov 2005 06:41:16 -0500
Will, I still have a copy if you need. ** SYSOP - N2KI DX CLUSTER dxc.n2ki.com:7300 RF Gateway 145.650 Website: www.n2ki.com DX Spoken Here _______________________________________________ RTTY mailin
/archives//html/RTTY/2005-11/msg00007.html (7,342 bytes)

6. [RTTY] N2KI Round Up (score: 1)
Author: "A.J.C." <n2ki@amsat.org>
Date: Sun, 8 Jan 2006 20:44:55 -0500
Greetings, This years band conditions seemed to be in rather decent shape for most of the contest; at least from Middletown NY. But then again if I had a really good antenna setup I bet the condition
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-01/msg00088.html (9,301 bytes)

7. Re: [RTTY] 1st rtty conest/ 1st contest! (score: 1)
Author: "A.J.C." <n2ki@amsat.org>
Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2006 06:36:01 -0500
Welcome to the world of RTTY contesting. Glad to have you aboard. Tony - N2KI SYSOP - N2KI DX CLUSTER dxc.n2ki.com:7300 RF Gateway 145.650 Website: www.n2ki.com DX Spoken Here _______________________
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-01/msg00109.html (8,322 bytes)

8. Re: [RTTY] RTTY Best Practices (score: 1)
Author: "A.J.C." <n2ki@amsat.org>
Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2006 07:12:28 -0500
All, Agreed; updating the CQ macro is a plus. Adding the CQ to the end does make it easier to differentiate the caller from the call-ee. "CQ Test N2KI N2KI CQ" as an example. No need to spell out the
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-01/msg00194.html (11,008 bytes)

9. Re: [RTTY] RTTY WAS on LoTW help (score: 1)
Author: "A.J.C." <n2ki@amsat.org>
Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2006 19:26:34 -0500
You have to create rules, like Don mentioned. Make sure you save them otherwise you'll be chasing your tail like I did for a few minutes. Speaking of WAS, Any Delaware and Iowa folks on that can spar
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-01/msg00459.html (8,822 bytes)

10. [RTTY] N2KI SOABLP (score: 1)
Author: "A.J.C." <n2ki@amsat.org>
Date: Sun, 5 Feb 2006 14:16:12 -0500
A fun contest. Thanks to all whom I worked. ___ A. Single OP., All band QSOs Points DX: State 160m: 0 0 0 0 80m: 0 0 0 0 40m: 2 5 2 0 20m: 96 256 34 3 15m: 1 3 1 0 10m: 0 0 0 0 Total: 99 264 37 3 Tot
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-02/msg00058.html (7,090 bytes)

11. [RTTY] West Virginia & Delaware on LOTW (score: 1)
Author: "A.J.C." <n2ki@amsat.org>
Date: Sun, 5 Feb 2006 22:32:35 -0500
Anyone care to make a sked this week on RTTY from West Virginia & Delaware? I need those two states on LOTW. Of course you need to be using LOTW. Thanks in advance. Tony - N2KI SYSOP - N2KI DX CLUSTE
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-02/msg00066.html (7,177 bytes)

12. [RTTY] N2KI SOAB (score: 1)
Author: "Anthony (N2KI)" <n2ki@amsat.org>
Date: Sun, 19 Mar 2006 20:00:28 -0500
Propagation seemed to be unidirectional. 15 and 10 were relatively non functional. Had a great time. Thanks for all the Q's QSOs DX: Call Areas 80m: 0 0 0 40m: 201 35 17 20m: 180 39 9 15m: 6 2 3 10m:
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-03/msg00244.html (6,525 bytes)

13. Re: [RTTY] [3830] BARTG (score: 1)
Author: "Anthony (N2KI)" <n2ki@amsat.org>
Date: Mon, 20 Mar 2006 07:49:25 -0500
Jerry, Shelby, I'm sure glad too that others have seen the very strange propagation. Having just installed a new system here, I have to admit there were points during the contest I was questioning my
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-03/msg00251.html (9,223 bytes)

14. [RTTY] RTTY Round Up Certificate (score: 1)
Author: "Anthony J. Cioffi" <n2ki@amsat.org>
Date: Thu, 8 Jun 2006 08:17:52 -0400
A nice surprise came in the mail yesterday. I got a certificate from the ARRL for first place in ENY section. Thnaks for the contacts! Tony N2KI _______________________________________________ RTTY m
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-06/msg00020.html (6,199 bytes)

15. Re: [RTTY] RTTY is getting lower and lower in frequency on 20 (score: 1)
Author: "Anthony (N2KI)" <n2ki@amsat.org>
Date: Sun, 11 Feb 2007 13:44:53 -0500
I agree. This is a product of operators who do not know how to successfully deal with adjacent stations, QRM or QRN on their rig. Maybe a review of the owner?s manual is in order? Unless they are rig
/archives//html/RTTY/2007-02/msg00105.html (8,268 bytes)

16. [RTTY] N2KI SOABLP (score: 1)
Author: "Anthony (N2KI)" <n2ki@amsat.org>
Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2007 07:29:06 -0500
Wow what a great contest! It was really amazing to see the bands jammed with RTTY ops. I didn't make one contact on 10 meters. 15 meters was anemic for me. 20, 40 and 80 were much better, especially
/archives//html/RTTY/2007-02/msg00134.html (7,379 bytes)

17. Re: [RTTY] WPX RTTY Log (score: 1)
Author: "Anthony (N2KI)" <n2ki@amsat.org>
Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2007 08:25:19 -0500
Are we supposed to get a reply from the robot that our log was accepted? I have not gotten anything back either way. Thanks Anthony - N2KI --Original Message-- From: rtty-bounces@contesting.com [mail
/archives//html/RTTY/2007-02/msg00232.html (8,613 bytes)

18. Re: [RTTY] 160 (score: 1)
Author: "Anthony (N2KI)" <n2ki@amsat.org>
Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2007 07:35:37 -0500
I think the biggest obstacle to overcome is the antenna. Many, including myself do not have a 160 antenna. You could load the 80 meter dipole but NVIS would be your working conditions to some extent.
/archives//html/RTTY/2007-02/msg00367.html (9,995 bytes)

19. Re: [RTTY] LoTW Speed (score: 1)
Author: "Anthony (N2KI)" <n2ki@amsat.org>
Date: Sun, 25 Feb 2007 15:46:55 -0500
It's the way to go. I finally applied for DXCC and WAS after almost 11000 QSO's. Anthony - N2KI Shortly after NAQP last night I uploaded my log to NCJ and LoTW. Early this morning, 17% of my NAQP log
/archives//html/RTTY/2007-02/msg00405.html (7,440 bytes)

20. Re: [RTTY] WAS-RTTY (score: 1)
Author: "Anthony (N2KI)" <n2ki@amsat.org>
Date: Wed, 7 Mar 2007 08:40:05 -0500
I was issued #500 16 Feb 2007. Anthony - N2KI --Original Message-- From: rtty-bounces@contesting.com [mailto:rtty-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of Inbody, Donald S Sent: Tuesday, March 06, 2007 1
/archives//html/RTTY/2007-03/msg00027.html (9,640 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2] [3]
This search system is powered by Namazu