Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:mikehaack@aim.com: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [RTTY] Comments on TX5C RTTY Operations (score: 1)
Author: mikehaack@aim.com
Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2008 21:06:24 -0400
I'm not sure which one I find more amusing. The folks calling the DX on their transmit frequency Or The other folks who take time away from their "busting the pileup" to correct them. Lets see, someo
/archives//html/RTTY/2008-03/msg00107.html (9,444 bytes)

2. Re: [RTTY] BARTG exch, and 599 (or not) (score: 1)
Author: mikehaack@aim.com
Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2008 17:57:00 -0400
From the my two cents department: If it was only a few stations that made the RST error, I can fully blame the operators. Its seems however to have been a wider problem then just a few, so maybe some
/archives//html/RTTY/2008-03/msg00261.html (11,086 bytes)

3. Re: [RTTY] Cheating (score: 1)
Author: Michael Haack <mikehaack@aim.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Jun 2010 16:49:36 -0500
There is no way a Single Op, with a Single transmitter should be up against SO2R. Sure someone can come up with a blackbox to keep only one signal on air at any given time, but still you have the dis
/archives//html/RTTY/2010-06/msg00193.html (7,731 bytes)

4. Re: [RTTY] cheating (score: 1)
Author: Michael Haack <mikehaack@aim.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Jun 2010 18:10:41 -0500
Joe, If you can sit there and honestly tell this group that an SO2R station does not have a distinct advantage, Fine. Then you would have no objection to a Single Operator, Single Transmitter Rule. C
/archives//html/RTTY/2010-06/msg00198.html (8,408 bytes)

5. Re: [RTTY] cheating (score: 1)
Author: Michael Haack <mikehaack@aim.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Jun 2010 19:33:53 -0500
Then Fine, Let him keep the edge, but let him take it up against the skills of other SO2R stations. And let the SO1R take their skills, fairly, against other SO1R stations. If you've got the time, mo
/archives//html/RTTY/2010-06/msg00213.html (9,234 bytes)

6. [RTTY] @ W6WRT.. Re: Cheatings and Disturbing observations (score: 1)
Author: Michael Haack <mikehaack@aim.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Jun 2010 19:40:31 -0500
Bill, Mike WB9B _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
/archives//html/RTTY/2010-06/msg00214.html (6,625 bytes)

7. Re: [RTTY] cheating (score: 1)
Author: Michael Haack <mikehaack@aim.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Jun 2010 20:24:34 -0500
Thanks for the fun Don, Kinda like starting a riot then going home to watch it on TV eh. I'll stand with Bill, W6WRT on this one, And leave the lobbyists to there own. Cu in the next one, SO1R.... Mi
/archives//html/RTTY/2010-06/msg00219.html (11,073 bytes)

8. Re: [RTTY] Fwd: RTTY Posts (score: 1)
Author: mikehaack@aim.com
Date: Sat, 26 Feb 2011 20:13:46 -0500
The spotting prohibition applies to SINGLE OPERATOR entry Classification Only. Entry Classification: Single Operator: One person performs all transmitting, receiving, spotting and logging functions a
/archives//html/RTTY/2011-02/msg00349.html (9,958 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu