I think that part of the discrepancy of opinion when it comes to the pros and cons of the NPRM is a difference in outlooks. Setting aside the not-insignificant problem of Winlink operators carelessly
Just to play devil's advocate for the moment... How is it known that the Pactor stations involved are under FCC jurisdiction (97.221(b) is an FCCism), and how is it known that this is not a general D
The non-K-land nodes should be identifiable from the Winlink station/frequency lists (and I believe there are some VE and XE stations in the system) For other uses of Pactor...you'd be stuck with the
Well, I just did something I haven't done in a long time. I opened a Winlink client and updated the Pactor frequency lists. For whatever it's worth, I see: VE7RBH, a P4 node, at 14081.5 IQ9IL, a P4 n
I'm going to preface this by saying: I'm generally _for_ removing the speed limit, but I want to see a narrower bandwidth limit imposed upon part of the band than either the ARRL or FCC are calling f