Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:lists@subich.com: 812 ]

Total 812 documents matching your query.

121. Re: [RTTY] INRAD filter question (score: 1)
Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <lists@subich.com>
Date: Sat, 25 Sep 2010 23:00:31 -0400
If the IF shift has enough range it will work. Find a "dead" place on the band, select the narrow filers and turn the IF shift one way or the other to the stops and see if you hear noise come up. 73
/archives//html/RTTY/2010-09/msg00107.html (15,531 bytes)

122. Re: [RTTY] INRAD filter question (score: 1)
Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <lists@subich.com>
Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2010 18:07:33 -0400
If the narrow filter is centered at 600 Hz in LSB, a 2.2 KHz offset should get you to 2800 Hz which should be more than enough. Check it though. See the information on AA5AU's web page: http://www.a
/archives//html/RTTY/2010-09/msg00113.html (10,603 bytes)

123. Re: [RTTY] 3XM6JR QSL (score: 1)
Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <lists@subich.com>
Date: Fri, 08 Oct 2010 16:02:00 -0400
Mine were received in November 2007 ... can't say if they came direct or via bureau. However, I was in no hurry and did not even send the direct request until August 2007 for several QSOs in June thr
/archives//html/RTTY/2010-10/msg00015.html (7,537 bytes)

124. Re: [RTTY] PJ2, PJ6, PJ7 RTTY? (score: 1)
Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <lists@subich.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Oct 2010 11:46:11 -0400
PJ7E has been on both 30 and 15 meters RTTY. PJ2MI was on RTTY today working primarily Europe. 73, ... Joe, W4TV _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com
/archives//html/RTTY/2010-10/msg00048.html (6,670 bytes)

125. Re: [RTTY] PJ4B rtty (score: 1)
Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <lists@subich.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Oct 2010 18:37:37 -0400
See the "PJ Band Plan" for avoiding mutual interference and overlapping pile-ups during the first couple weeks of operation: http://www.bonaire2010.com/pdf/pj_band_plan.pdf The plan was worked out in
/archives//html/RTTY/2010-10/msg00086.html (7,550 bytes)

126. Re: [RTTY] WRITELOG QUESTION (score: 1)
Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <lists@subich.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Oct 2010 19:56:24 -0400
Make sure you have properly configured hardware handshake in WriteLog and your interface. The TS-570 is one of the most difficult/unreliable CAT interfaces because the controller is too small/slow f
/archives//html/RTTY/2010-10/msg00088.html (8,581 bytes)

127. Re: [RTTY] Fwd: IARU BEACONS (score: 1)
Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <lists@subich.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Nov 2010 20:45:14 -0500
Absolute *GARBAGE!* Nobody needs more than 400 KHz (+/- 200 Hz) for *CW* beacons. Any (FSK) RTTY signal (mark frequency) below 14.099.700 or above 14.100.470 should be just fine. For AFSK "carrier" f
/archives//html/RTTY/2010-11/msg00071.html (9,345 bytes)

128. Re: [RTTY] ZL8X RTTY? (score: 1)
Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <lists@subich.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2010 22:37:11 -0500
They have been on both 30 and 17 meter RTTY over the last three days. I worked them Monday morning around 1400Z on 30 meters and have heard them on 17 between 1800-2100z yesterday/today. They are cur
/archives//html/RTTY/2010-11/msg00111.html (7,511 bytes)

129. Re: [RTTY] New call with no numbers (score: 1)
Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <lists@subich.com>
Date: Wed, 01 Dec 2010 17:07:33 -0500
... or TYA11 from 1981 (don't know if that was ever on RTTY)? 73, ... Joe, W4TV _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mail
/archives//html/RTTY/2010-12/msg00009.html (8,766 bytes)

130. Re: [RTTY] Why is 40 Meter contesting in CW segment? (score: 1)
Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <lists@subich.com>
Date: Sun, 05 Dec 2010 10:06:08 -0500
Since SSB typically requires more than 25 times the bandwidth of a CW signal (100 Hz vs. 2700 Hz), a more "fair" division of the available 200 KHz would be 7000 - 7035 for CW, 7035-7070 for RTTY (da
/archives//html/RTTY/2010-12/msg00041.html (18,301 bytes)

131. Re: [RTTY] Problem with MMTTY, more (score: 1)
Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <lists@subich.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2010 09:59:51 -0500
That is the way Windows initializes the serial port (the data port is initialized high). You might look into using Strobe (pin 1) for PTT to see if it is initialized low or look for one of the old "s
/archives//html/RTTY/2010-12/msg00212.html (8,160 bytes)

132. Re: [RTTY] Sound card for RTTY/MMTTY (score: 1)
Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <lists@subich.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Dec 2010 15:34:53 -0500
For USB sound cards these two have separate mic and line inputs and seem to work well with WriteLog and N1MM Logger: http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16829126101 http://www.newegg.
/archives//html/RTTY/2010-12/msg00253.html (9,855 bytes)

133. Re: [RTTY] FT2000 & AFSK (score: 1)
Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <lists@subich.com>
Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2011 11:54:36 -0500
Have you checked "dAtA DT OUT" to confirm that "Main" is selected? If Sub is selected and the subreceiver turned off, there will be no output. Also confirm your "dAtA OUT LVL" settings. An alternati
/archives//html/RTTY/2011-01/msg00094.html (11,087 bytes)

134. Re: [RTTY] who understands rtty code, strange thing happening, same characters always dropped (score: 1)
Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <lists@subich.com>
Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2011 11:07:09 -0500
All of these characters either start or stop with a space (I has seen them listed both ways in code tables and can't track down a definitive "Bit order" - Chen?). There are two other "printing" char
/archives//html/RTTY/2011-01/msg00107.html (10,785 bytes)

135. Re: [RTTY] MMTTY AFC Bug (score: 1)
Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <lists@subich.com>
Date: Sun, 09 Jan 2011 11:36:55 -0500
Are you sure AFC is turning off (being disabled) and not retuning due to an interfering signal or noise? I've long noticed AFC will "move" the receive frequency in response to noise with or a strong
/archives//html/RTTY/2011-01/msg00157.html (11,593 bytes)

136. Re: [RTTY] After the Contest, AMP REPAIRS?? Interface Choices?? (score: 1)
Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <lists@subich.com>
Date: Sun, 09 Jan 2011 22:42:26 -0500
Wrong, Made in the Slovak Republic ... not the former USSR by a long distance. microHAM have been doing interfaces for nearly 10 years and even the first interfaces made are still supported by the c
/archives//html/RTTY/2011-01/msg00179.html (9,668 bytes)

137. Re: [RTTY] MMTTY AFC Bug (score: 1)
Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <lists@subich.com>
Date: Sun, 09 Jan 2011 23:32:58 -0500
Don, Are you using the "Profile Panel?" It also has the option to turn AFC ON/OFF based on CQ mode or S&P mode ... it is possible there is some "false triggering" of AFC in that code as well. 73, ...
/archives//html/RTTY/2011-01/msg00182.html (13,367 bytes)

138. Re: [RTTY] After the Contest, AMP REPAIRS?? Interface Choices?? (score: 1)
Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <lists@subich.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2011 11:29:38 -0500
You said "Soviet State" which implies part of the USSR not a member of the Warsaw Pact. There is a big difference, even today, in the two. That's true even with new amateur transceivers. Ask an owne
/archives//html/RTTY/2011-01/msg00197.html (12,875 bytes)

139. Re: [RTTY] software (score: 1)
Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <lists@subich.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2011 13:35:57 -0500
Unfortunately, for users with 64 bit systems version 10.76 has significant problems. You would not see it since you've obviously worked around them but the 64 bit installer/UAC support and support f
/archives//html/RTTY/2011-01/msg00434.html (15,354 bytes)

140. Re: [RTTY] MMTTY AFC Bug (score: 1)
Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <lists@subich.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2011 21:56:10 -0500
Ed, You could suggest the change to JE3HHT (via JA7UDE) but to be correct any check mark would have to disappear as soon a any profile that included "AFC=ON" was loaded since MARK and SHIFT are part
/archives//html/RTTY/2011-01/msg00467.html (12,819 bytes)

Current List: 121 - 140
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] [17] [18] [19] [20]
This search system is powered by Namazu