Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:lists@subich.com: 812 ]

Total 812 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [RTTY] Stateside QSL Bureau (score: 1)
Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <lists@subich.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2008 13:06:39 -0500
No - read the data from ARRL: http://www.arrl.org/qsl/qslin.html. Read the FIRST ENTRY under "Don'ts." The "Incoming QSL bureaus" ONLY accept cards from OUTSIDE the 48 states. In other words, the AR
/archives//html/RTTY/2008-12/msg00340.html (9,814 bytes)

2. Re: [RTTY] FT-1000MP Speaker (score: 1)
Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <lists@subich.com>
Date: Fri, 2 Jan 2009 20:05:27 -0500
No, I used a simple 1/8" stereo audio cable between the AF Out and Line In of the soundcard for years. I still use the AF Out with the stereo line input of an old SoundBlaster Digital Music (MP3+) b
/archives//html/RTTY/2009-01/msg00061.html (9,225 bytes)

3. Re: [RTTY] K3 (score: 1)
Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <lists@subich.com>
Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2009 16:06:12 -0500
I can confirm that the 200 Hz filter is a bit too tight. My 200 Hz filters measure 170 and 180 Hz which puts both RTTY tones at the -6dB points with most of the switching sidebands well down the fil
/archives//html/RTTY/2009-01/msg00228.html (10,539 bytes)

4. Re: [RTTY] K3 (score: 1)
Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <lists@subich.com>
Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2009 18:20:10 -0500
I suspect Lyle is generating both PSK31 and FSK in the DSP and not creating external audio. 73, ... Joe, W4TV _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com ht
/archives//html/RTTY/2009-01/msg00243.html (9,709 bytes)

5. Re: [RTTY] K3 (score: 1)
Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <lists@subich.com>
Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 17:11:50 -0500
The "interference window" ... that is the difference between the 250 Hz DSP bandwidth for RTTY and the -30 dB response point for the roofing filter is very small. Using measured values (the 500 Hz n
/archives//html/RTTY/2009-01/msg00289.html (14,407 bytes)

6. Re: [RTTY] CQ to accept eQSL for Awards.. (score: 1)
Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <lists@subich.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 14:23:44 -0500
Yes, the attitude of those who won't provide proof of license and proof of identity to participate in LotW is a problem. The arguments concerning "the card within a bundle" being sufficient to receiv
/archives//html/RTTY/2009-01/msg00370.html (13,804 bytes)

7. Re: [RTTY] CQ to accept eQSL for Awards.. (score: 1)
Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <lists@subich.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2009 00:41:15 -0500
That's correct with respect to Logbook of the World (and one reason ARRL does not require a license copy from US licensees). However it is entirely on point with regard to the integrity of eQSL. Qui
/archives//html/RTTY/2009-01/msg00375.html (13,353 bytes)

8. Re: [RTTY] Best RTTY program/hardware (score: 1)
Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <lists@subich.com>
Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2009 00:55:13 -0500
In this configuration the PK232 is simply acting as a 5-bit to 8-bit converter. It is accepting the raw 5-bit 45.45 baud data stream from an external modem, doing a serial to parallel conversion and
/archives//html/RTTY/2009-01/msg00476.html (14,835 bytes)

9. Re: [RTTY] Best RTTY program/hardware (score: 1)
Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <lists@subich.com>
Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2009 13:21:01 -0500
As mentioned elsewhere, hardware designs are simply too inflexible and too costly. Anyone can throw together some code for a sound card and release it for free. Unfortunately, that makes doing a RTT
/archives//html/RTTY/2009-01/msg00505.html (11,095 bytes)

10. Re: [RTTY] Best program (score: 1)
Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <lists@subich.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 22:06:16 -0500
No, I said it would not be worthwhile for the programmers at microHAM. You don't need to do it with external hardware. The ADC in any quality soundcard will provide 24 bit resolution and that's plen
/archives//html/RTTY/2009-01/msg00577.html (16,365 bytes)

11. Re: [RTTY] Best RTTY Program (score: 1)
Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <lists@subich.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 00:00:12 -0500
As dynamic as HF can be at times one could even make a case for running 3 x 3 or 3 x 5 demodulators ... with each of the three sets optimized for different characteristics (e.g., multi-path, selecti
/archives//html/RTTY/2009-01/msg00584.html (14,120 bytes)

12. Re: [RTTY] Fldigi Question (score: 1)
Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <lists@subich.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 13:40:01 -0500
FLdigi will support about any Windows audio device. There may be a problem if you use the SignaLinkUSB PTT ("soundcard PTT") since FLdigi opens the soundcard for output as soon as the program starts
/archives//html/RTTY/2009-01/msg00604.html (8,210 bytes)

13. Re: [RTTY] It felt like MMTTY under N1MM was sending slowly (score: 1)
Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <lists@subich.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 21:20:32 -0500
Character wait and Diddle Wait will certainly slow down MTTY. "Digital Output" does not as verified by others. However, there is one other possibility that does not necessarily involve MMTTY. If the
/archives//html/RTTY/2009-02/msg00252.html (10,744 bytes)

14. Re: [RTTY] Fun, but (score: 1)
Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <lists@subich.com>
Date: Sun, 1 Mar 2009 14:32:08 -0500
The issue is with AFSK not FSK. The first fix was released in the pubic beta software (MCU 2.82/DSP 2.00) dated 9 Feb 2009 and includes a transmit BPF (CONFIG:AFSK TX). Additional improvements to th
/archives//html/RTTY/2009-03/msg00019.html (12,889 bytes)

15. Re: [RTTY] Fun, but (score: 1)
Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <lists@subich.com>
Date: Sun, 1 Mar 2009 16:14:42 -0500
It addressed some but not all of the causes. The current alpha - which I do have - seems to have addressed the root cause. However, the bandpass filter may still be of value for some of the lousy AF
/archives//html/RTTY/2009-03/msg00021.html (12,236 bytes)

16. Re: [RTTY] Fun, but (score: 1)
Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <lists@subich.com>
Date: Sun, 1 Mar 2009 19:13:29 -0500
While FSK as implemented in many of the current rigs is a kluge and may not generate the absolute minimum bandwidth, it is still far better/cleaner than the AFSK generated by rigs with the processor
/archives//html/RTTY/2009-03/msg00045.html (10,398 bytes)

17. Re: [RTTY] Micro Ham Digi Keyer (score: 1)
Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <lists@subich.com>
Date: Mon, 2 Mar 2009 20:38:47 -0500
None of the CW decoding programs appear to be compatible with microHAM DigiKeyer or microKEYER II for sending CW. Any of the interfaces can be used for decoding by treating the built-in soundcard as
/archives//html/RTTY/2009-03/msg00103.html (8,709 bytes)

18. Re: [RTTY] NAQP RTTY Frequencies & the DX beacons (score: 1)
Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <lists@subich.com>
Date: Thu, 5 Mar 2009 20:03:12 -0500
Sure, and the IARU bandplan has a lot of other stupid stuff that is only honored in its ignorance. 1KHz guard bands for a signal 50 Hz wide are absurd. As far as I'm concerned any contest manager th
/archives//html/RTTY/2009-03/msg00152.html (18,407 bytes)

19. Re: [RTTY] I just have to ask (score: 1)
Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <lists@subich.com>
Date: Sat, 7 Mar 2009 12:32:54 -0500
Since the beacon network is CW, why isn't it moved to 14.000.0, 21.000.0, etc.? Moving them to the bottom of the band, they provide a nice band edge marker and the multi-KW, multi-multi stations can
/archives//html/RTTY/2009-03/msg00171.html (10,698 bytes)

20. Re: [RTTY] need some help with an ft-950 and a signalink (score: 1)
Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <lists@subich.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2009 00:59:28 -0400
SignaLink is AFSK only. Connect the SignaLink to the DATA jack using the SLUSB6PM cable, set the FT-950 to PKT/LSB and configure MMTTY to use the SignaLink soundcard (USB Audio CODEC). Enable PTT in
/archives//html/RTTY/2009-03/msg00351.html (8,936 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] [17] [18] [19] [20]
This search system is powered by Namazu