Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:ku0a@mchsi.com: 52 ]

Total 52 documents matching your query.

21. [RTTY] K4M on RTTY (score: 1)
Author: "Nelson Moyer" <ku0a@mchsi.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2009 18:49:47 -0500
I couldn't print K4M on 30 meters this morning well enough to call. The news from Midway has been sparse to say the least. Does anybody have a clue if and when K4M might come up on 17 or 20 meter RTT
/archives//html/RTTY/2009-10/msg00096.html (6,459 bytes)

22. [RTTY] K4M on RTTY (score: 1)
Author: "Nelson Moyer" <ku0a@mchsi.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2009 22:07:19 -0500
The only spot for the Midwest on 17 meters was KK0M. He is in CA, not the Midwest. 17 isn't open to Iowa at 0300 UTC. Unless K4M runs RTTY on 20 meters between 1800-2200 UTC, the Midwest won't work t
/archives//html/RTTY/2009-10/msg00101.html (6,975 bytes)

23. [RTTY] K4M Shutdown Plan (score: 1)
Author: "Nelson Moyer" <ku0a@mchsi.com>
Date: Sat, 17 Oct 2009 20:26:51 -0500
I just read the K4M shutdown plan, and it doesn't sound like there's any more RTTY in it. Too bad they didn't take a real RTTY op with them to Midway. NA didn't have much chance to work them on RTTY.
/archives//html/RTTY/2009-10/msg00116.html (7,078 bytes)

24. [RTTY] K4M (score: 1)
Author: "Nelson Moyer" <ku0a@mchsi.com>
Date: Sun, 18 Oct 2009 15:02:03 -0500
OK, so I was wrong. There really is a good RTTY op on Midway. Today he came up on 17 meters at the perfect time for propagation, and he was running a good rate Stateside through an very active pileup
/archives//html/RTTY/2009-10/msg00125.html (6,388 bytes)

25. Re: [RTTY] Apologies! (score: 1)
Author: "Nelson Moyer" <ku0a@mchsi.com>
Date: Mon, 7 Jun 2010 06:52:28 -0500
Don't apologize, just hit split and go work the DX. It happened to me last Thursday on 20 meter RTTY, and I hope the lid that called me a dummy saw my QSO a few minutes later. I'll bet he still hasn'
/archives//html/RTTY/2010-06/msg00058.html (9,432 bytes)

26. Re: [RTTY] ST0R (score: 1)
Author: "Nelson Moyer" <ku0a@mchsi.com>
Date: Sun, 31 Jul 2011 17:09:10 -0500
They aren't THAT difficult to work! I found success by calling in openings when I couldn't find the last QSO. Granted, there aren't always opening with RTTY bandwidth and a short split range, but it
/archives//html/RTTY/2011-07/msg00298.html (9,068 bytes)

27. Re: [RTTY] ST0R (score: 1)
Author: "Nelson Moyer" <ku0a@mchsi.com>
Date: Mon, 1 Aug 2011 08:07:02 -0500
I'm not a big fan of running by the numbers. Observing propagation and running by the numbers are usually mutually exclusive for us in the black hole. By the time they get to the zeros, the band has
/archives//html/RTTY/2011-08/msg00000.html (13,278 bytes)

28. Re: [RTTY] Kudos to EA2RY for the ST0R Online Log Greenie Plus Feature (score: 1)
Author: "Nelson Moyer" <ku0a@mchsi.com>
Date: Fri, 5 Aug 2011 06:44:26 -0500
The greenie plus feature has been there since day one, however the notable change to the web page is the absence of the operation statistics and leader board since it came back online. Nelson, KU0A H
/archives//html/RTTY/2011-08/msg00107.html (8,045 bytes)

29. [RTTY] T32C? (score: 1)
Author: "Nelson Moyer" <ku0a@mchsi.com>
Date: Thu, 6 Oct 2011 15:53:24 -0500
Are the RTTY ops on T32C being punitive, or that's going on out there? Nelson, KU0A _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/m
/archives//html/RTTY/2011-10/msg00043.html (6,166 bytes)

30. [RTTY] FT857 on RTTY Problem (score: 1)
Author: "Nelson Moyer" <ku0a@mchsi.com>
Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2012 15:48:05 -0600
I'm trying to get my FT857 on RTTY using the HAL DXP38. I wired a new data cable, but I can't get audio into the DXP38 using either 1200 or 9600 baud settings on COM1. I set the FT857 for RTTY-L and
/archives//html/RTTY/2012-01/msg00303.html (6,430 bytes)

31. [RTTY] Lets try again on the FT857 problem (score: 1)
Author: "Nelson Moyer" <ku0a@mchsi.com>
Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2012 19:42:11 -0600
Group, I made up a new DIN data cable for the FT857 with the following connections: Pin 1 - Data Out - 1200 baud - Green - Not used Pin 2 - PTT - PTT - Orange - To PTT input on DXP38 Pin 3 - Data In
/archives//html/RTTY/2012-01/msg00306.html (7,503 bytes)

32. Re: [RTTY] 9M0L 18103 up (score: 1)
Author: "Nelson Moyer" <ku0a@mchsi.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2012 22:13:39 -0500
Their choice of times and bands hasn't favored East Central Iowa up to now. Of course, I had a meeting and had to be away from the radio tonight, when it sounds like I may have had a chance to print
/archives//html/RTTY/2012-04/msg00117.html (8,597 bytes)

33. Re: [RTTY] 9M0L 18103 up (score: 1)
Author: "Nelson Moyer" <ku0a@mchsi.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2012 07:51:42 -0500
I don't understand why 9M0L never works NA on 20 meters at the predicted opening between 1300-1700 UTC. They seem to prefer to run EU on 15, 12 or 10 meter during our 20 meter openings. Actually, our
/archives//html/RTTY/2012-04/msg00125.html (10,407 bytes)

34. Re: [RTTY] ?? 7O6T (score: 1)
Author: "Nelson Moyer" <ku0a@mchsi.com>
Date: Fri, 11 May 2012 18:44:39 -0500
The persistent snubbing of NA on RTTY is getting tiresome, especially with few days of the operation left. Maybe the NA response should be for the DXCC Desk to refuse to accredit the operation on the
/archives//html/RTTY/2012-05/msg00064.html (10,774 bytes)

35. Re: [RTTY] ?? 7O6T (score: 1)
Author: "Nelson Moyer" <ku0a@mchsi.com>
Date: Fri, 11 May 2012 19:02:40 -0500
Mike, Consider the statistics. Total Qs = 120218 RTTY Qs = 2253 (1.9%) EU RTTY Qs = 1893 (84%) NA RTTY Qs = 88 (3.9%) Obviously, these guys didn't plan on being a presence on RTTY. Obviously, these g
/archives//html/RTTY/2012-05/msg00066.html (13,505 bytes)

36. Re: [RTTY] ?? 7O6T (score: 1)
Author: "Nelson Moyer" <ku0a@mchsi.com>
Date: Fri, 11 May 2012 19:40:56 -0500
Dave, I haven't chased them on RTTY because while I can print them, they work only EU. For the record, my DXCC RTTY total is 313, so I'm pretty sure they could hear me if they were working NA between
/archives//html/RTTY/2012-05/msg00073.html (10,141 bytes)

37. Re: [RTTY] ?? 7O6T (score: 1)
Author: "Nelson Moyer" <ku0a@mchsi.com>
Date: Fri, 11 May 2012 19:42:31 -0500
Dave, First, re the facts, they are from the online log, last update. Second, by 0600 UTC , it's 1:00 a.m. in the morning in Iowa, and 20 meters isn't open. Nelson, KU0A Mike, Consider the statistics
/archives//html/RTTY/2012-05/msg00074.html (9,910 bytes)

38. [RTTY] Digipan Compatibility Question (score: 1)
Author: "Nelson Moyer" <ku0a@mchsi.com>
Date: Tue, 5 Nov 2013 09:43:29 -0600
While it isn't strictly about RTTY, I'd like to know if Digipan 2.0 will run under Windows 8 before installing it on my new laptop. MMTTY is compatible with Windows 8 according to the web site, but t
/archives//html/RTTY/2013-11/msg00013.html (6,447 bytes)

39. [RTTY] FT5ZM Pileups (score: 1)
Author: "Nelson Moyer" <ku0a@mchsi.com>
Date: Sun, 2 Feb 2014 18:30:26 -0600
Actually, the pileups aren't all that unruly. The wide split provides plenty of room for the astute operator to find the last QSO and position himself in an open spot nearby to let the DX find him. T
/archives//html/RTTY/2014-02/msg00027.html (7,129 bytes)

40. Re: [RTTY] FT5ZM RTTY is a zoo (score: 1)
Author: "Nelson Moyer" <ku0a@mchsi.com>
Date: Sun, 2 Feb 2014 20:43:08 -0600
Not really. 20 MHz of split provides spaces for stations to call and be worked. Some recent DXpeditions have tried to work the world in 5-10 MHz, and the result was wall to wall callers, no spaces, a
/archives//html/RTTY/2014-02/msg00038.html (10,021 bytes)

Current List: 21 - 40
Page: [1] [2] [3]
This search system is powered by Namazu