- 21. Re: [RTTY] Topband: 160m in RTTY Contests (score: 1)
- Author: "Jeff Blaine AC0C" <keepwalking188@yahoo.com>
- Date: Sat, 31 Oct 2009 18:08:09 -0500
- Joe, I'm curious - which parts of 160m do you consider heavily used and which lightly used? The reason I ask... Once you get above about 1830 or so, and then on up to around 1900 or so, it seems that
- /archives//html/RTTY/2009-10/msg00251.html (17,763 bytes)
- 22. Re: [RTTY] Topband: 160m in RTTY Contests (score: 1)
- Author: "Jeff Blaine AC0C" <keepwalking188@yahoo.com>
- Date: Sun, 1 Nov 2009 01:46:10 -0500
- Joe, Humans are not optimized to climb Everest. They do it for the challenge - to see if, despite the challenges, it can be done. So if a guy wants to bang his head against the multi-path wall trying
- /archives//html/RTTY/2009-10/msg00265.html (11,868 bytes)
- 23. Re: [RTTY] 160m in RTTY Contests (score: 1)
- Author: "Jeff Blaine AC0C" <keepwalking188@yahoo.com>
- Date: Sun, 1 Nov 2009 12:36:59 -0600
- Bill, One of Chen's earlier comments closed with essentially - do it (a contest) and then we would have data. I think that was early on the best point of this exchange. Having a RTTY contest on 160m
- /archives//html/RTTY/2009-11/msg00016.html (9,196 bytes)
- 24. Re: [RTTY] Thanks for the Award (score: 1)
- Author: "Jeff Blaine AC0C" <keepwalking188@yahoo.com>
- Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 15:17:24 -0600
- What a fantastic accomplishment Mike. Congratulations. 73/jeff/ac0c _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/
- /archives//html/RTTY/2009-11/msg00064.html (7,688 bytes)
- 25. Re: [RTTY] macros (score: 1)
- Author: "Jeff Blaine AC0C" <keepwalking188@yahoo.com>
- Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2009 01:09:13 -0600
- Hi Simon, I wanted to follow up with you and see if the overhaul of the RTTY decoder made it into the v5 code? Thanks! 73/jeff/ac0c _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list R
- /archives//html/RTTY/2009-11/msg00131.html (8,529 bytes)
- 26. Re: [RTTY] QSL survey (score: 1)
- Author: "Jeff Blaine AC0C" <keepwalking188@yahoo.com>
- Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2009 15:16:01 -0600
- Glen, Please have the reply below. Of all the modes, the RTTY guys are by far the highest responding LoTW group. About 60%. Yet another reason to love this classic mode. 73/jeff/ac0c YES - I use DXKE
- /archives//html/RTTY/2009-12/msg00038.html (9,976 bytes)
- 27. [RTTY] beyond optimization ? (score: 1)
- Author: "Jeff Blaine AC0C" <keepwalking188@yahoo.com>
- Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2010 13:46:37 -0600
- Funny story - I worked one guy toward the end. He had his callsign in a macro that was overly optimized for speed. Meaning there was not a space or anything between his calls. And it was one of these
- /archives//html/RTTY/2010-01/msg00031.html (8,368 bytes)
- 28. [RTTY] AC0C 3830 submission (score: 1)
- Author: "Jeff Blaine AC0C" <keepwalking188@yahoo.com>
- Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2010 17:53:56 -0600
- Call: AC0C Operator(s): AC0C Station: AC0C Class: Single Op HP QTH: Kansas Operating Time (hrs): 23 Summary: Band QSOs -- 80: 208 40: 83 20: 565 15: 24 10: 0 -- Total: 880 State/Prov = 56 Countries =
- /archives//html/RTTY/2010-01/msg00056.html (8,797 bytes)
- 29. Re: [RTTY] ARRL RTTY (score: 1)
- Author: "Jeff Blaine AC0C" <keepwalking188@yahoo.com>
- Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2010 23:01:02 -0600
- Hi Jim, Can you explain to the uninitiated how a dual RX configuration would provide an advantage? I can see advancing from one q to the next on each rig, alternatively, and then transmitting on the
- /archives//html/RTTY/2010-01/msg00063.html (12,601 bytes)
- 30. Re: [RTTY] ARRL RTTY (score: 1)
- Author: "Jeff Blaine AC0C" <keepwalking188@yahoo.com>
- Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2010 11:56:22 -0600
- Ed, Thanks for taking the time to answer. I do understand SO2R basics, but for the specific mode RTTY - where the machine is doing the decode work, I wanted to see if there was something other than t
- /archives//html/RTTY/2010-01/msg00091.html (10,192 bytes)
- 31. Re: [RTTY] ARRL RTTY (score: 1)
- Author: "Jeff Blaine AC0C" <keepwalking188@yahoo.com>
- Date: Wed, 6 Jan 2010 14:31:52 -0600
- Thanks Richard for the details. A real education you've passed over here... Really appreciate it. The mechanics of a machine decode vs. a traditional ear decode are fundamentally different and that's
- /archives//html/RTTY/2010-01/msg00137.html (13,812 bytes)
- 32. Re: [RTTY] Dashes in Contest Reports (score: 1)
- Author: "Jeff Blaine AC0C" <keepwalking188@yahoo.com>
- Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2010 23:00:19 +0800
- A compendium of this guy's (Chen) comments would be a hard-core RTTY enthusiasts must-have. I can see it now... "Everything you always wanted to know about RTTY but were afraid to ask by Kok Chen." S
- /archives//html/RTTY/2010-01/msg00274.html (13,254 bytes)
- 33. Re: [RTTY] Dashes in Contest Reports (score: 1)
- Author: "Jeff Blaine AC0C" <keepwalking188@yahoo.com>
- Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2010 12:09:18 +0800
- Gentlemen, If the optimum "repeat" message is to use dash or space - whichever is opposite of your primary send, then is there an argument establishing the best primary (initial) send should be with
- /archives//html/RTTY/2010-01/msg00349.html (10,370 bytes)
- 34. Re: [RTTY] USOS Question (score: 1)
- Author: "keepwalking188@yahoo.com" <keepwalking188@yahoo.com>
- Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2010 16:50:07 -0800 (PST)
- The discussion has centered around dash vs. Space. So let me ask at the risk of offending those who already know everything there is to know - would any of the other seperators (comma?) offer a perfo
- /archives//html/RTTY/2010-01/msg00386.html (8,908 bytes)
- 35. [RTTY] AC0C CQ WPX RTTY 3830 SUBMISSION (score: 1)
- Author: "Jeff Blaine AC0C" <keepwalking188@yahoo.com>
- Date: Sun, 14 Feb 2010 23:24:06 -0600
- CQ WW RTTY WPX Contest Call: AC0C Operator(s): AC0C Station: AC0C Class: SOAB HP QTH: Kansas Operating Time (hrs): 30 Summary: Band QSOs Pts -- 80: 177 410 40: 147 480 20: 419 752 15: 184 523 10: 0 0
- /archives//html/RTTY/2010-02/msg00096.html (7,779 bytes)
- 36. Re: [RTTY] AA5AU Inducted into the CQ Hall of Fame (score: 1)
- Author: "Jeff Blaine AC0C" <keepwalking188@yahoo.com>
- Date: Sun, 16 May 2010 02:00:18 -0500
- Don, I was privileged to see your induction tonight at the Dayton dinner. No one deserves this more. Congratulations. It's an honor to be in your presence. One man CAN make a difference. 73/jeff/ac0c
- /archives//html/RTTY/2010-05/msg00075.html (9,261 bytes)
- 37. Re: [RTTY] 200 hz filter on RTTY (score: 1)
- Author: "Jeff Blaine AC0C" <keepwalking188@yahoo.com>
- Date: Tue, 1 Jun 2010 13:05:06 -0500
- Gentlemen, Anyone who knows my call, knows that I **love** crystal filters. But I am confused specifically in the case of RTTY. MMTTY - as well as any other decoding software - all incorporate DSP fi
- /archives//html/RTTY/2010-06/msg00008.html (10,129 bytes)
- 38. Re: [RTTY] 200 hz filter on RTTY (score: 1)
- Author: "Jeff Blaine AC0C" <keepwalking188@yahoo.com>
- Date: Tue, 1 Jun 2010 15:01:41 -0500
- Thank you Chen, I am happy to have remembered the summary of your earlier comments. I find using an extremely narrow crystal filter to be difficult for the tuning reason you mentioned. In S&P especia
- /archives//html/RTTY/2010-06/msg00012.html (14,520 bytes)
- 39. Re: [RTTY] Icom IC-7600 200 Hz Filter on RTTY (score: 1)
- Author: "Jeff Blaine AC0C" <keepwalking188@yahoo.com>
- Date: Tue, 1 Jun 2010 16:10:46 -0500
- Hi Don, What are the settings used for the BPF in MMTTY for this work? 73/jeff/ac0c _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/m
- /archives//html/RTTY/2010-06/msg00014.html (8,557 bytes)
- 40. Re: [RTTY] 200 hz filter on RTTY (score: 1)
- Author: "Jeff Blaine AC0C" <keepwalking188@yahoo.com>
- Date: Tue, 1 Jun 2010 16:20:03 -0500
- Joe, You are right. I think we discussed the shape factor of the K3 250 hz 8 pole design earlier on the board few months back. I have the same memory as you. The shape factor (if you want to use that
- /archives//html/RTTY/2010-06/msg00015.html (13,176 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu