Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:keepwalking188@yahoo.com: 176 ]

Total 176 documents matching your query.

141. Re: [RTTY] Looking for an interface - a few simple requirements (score: 1)
Author: "Jeff Blaine" <keepwalking188@yahoo.com>
Date: Wed, 2 Oct 2013 23:16:41 -0500
I only remember a few - and those stand out just because they are rare. I just figured were guys hunt-and-peck or using the K3/paddle thing. Definitely this issue is not related to the physical inter
/archives//html/RTTY/2013-10/msg00062.html (19,322 bytes)

142. Re: [RTTY] Courtesy (score: 1)
Author: "Jeff Blaine" <keepwalking188@yahoo.com>
Date: Thu, 3 Oct 2013 11:26:13 -0500
The format for the best exchange is pretty well fine-tuned. And as with the /QRP, the more stuff you put on the line, the more unproductive it is. GL is another example of that. The direct cost is in
/archives//html/RTTY/2013-10/msg00078.html (13,341 bytes)

143. Re: [RTTY] RTTY Contests (score: 1)
Author: "Jeff Blaine" <keepwalking188@yahoo.com>
Date: Thu, 3 Oct 2013 20:33:57 -0500
I am guessing Tom (#1) was making light of this. Pretty good idea though. ha ha. 73/jeff/ac0c www.ac0c.com alpha-charlie-zero-charlie --Original Message-- From: Tom Haavisto Sent: Thursday, October 0
/archives//html/RTTY/2013-10/msg00102.html (9,915 bytes)

144. Re: [RTTY] Courtesy (score: 1)
Author: "Jeff Blaine" <keepwalking188@yahoo.com>
Date: Thu, 3 Oct 2013 21:30:08 -0500
The fact is that to do well, a serious contest effort needs to get maximal efficiency out of the time spent. This is in addition the prior investments in gear and antennas, getting things debugged an
/archives//html/RTTY/2013-10/msg00105.html (11,083 bytes)

145. Re: [RTTY] ARRL attack on current RTTY users (score: 1)
Author: "Jeff Blaine" <keepwalking188@yahoo.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2013 10:26:31 -0600
What I cannot understand is what the underlying driver for this change actually was. Who benefits? These "committees" at the ARRL don't get up in the morning and say "let's think about what unneeded
/archives//html/RTTY/2013-11/msg00117.html (11,985 bytes)

146. Re: [RTTY] ARRL attack on current RTTY users (score: 1)
Author: "Jeff Blaine" <keepwalking188@yahoo.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2013 22:35:15 -0600
Kok, Yea, I also don't see the tie to "modern" in that none of the modern methods are wide banded. Only the stuff for mail relay seems to be. I actually don't understand how winlink mail makes sense
/archives//html/RTTY/2013-11/msg00126.html (13,118 bytes)

147. Re: [RTTY] ARRL attack on current RTTY users (score: 1)
Author: "Jeff Blaine" <keepwalking188@yahoo.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2013 22:40:10 -0600
Sorry, left off one sentence. Added here... 73/jeff/ac0c www.ac0c.com alpha-charlie-zero-charlie Kok, Yea, I also don't see the tie to "modern" in that none of the modern methods are wide banded. Onl
/archives//html/RTTY/2013-11/msg00127.html (12,792 bytes)

148. Re: [RTTY] ARRL attack on current RTTY users (score: 1)
Author: "Jeff Blaine" <keepwalking188@yahoo.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2013 23:26:36 -0600
Kok, Sorry for the confusion. What I mean is that the document 28 from the ARRL, which is undersigned by 5 hams on the ARRL committee - and that committee seems to contain two winlink proponents - an
/archives//html/RTTY/2013-11/msg00130.html (12,485 bytes)

149. Re: [RTTY] ARRL attack on current RTTY users (score: 1)
Author: "Jeff Blaine" <keepwalking188@yahoo.com>
Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2013 00:25:07 -0600
Not to worry Don, I think the ARRL is really saying it like this: If you like your data modes bandplan, you can keep it. PERIOD! 73/jeff/ac0c www.ac0c.com alpha-charlie-zero-charlie So in other words
/archives//html/RTTY/2013-11/msg00134.html (13,199 bytes)

150. Re: [RTTY] ARRL attack on current RTTY users (score: 1)
Author: "Jeff Blaine" <keepwalking188@yahoo.com>
Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2013 22:37:14 -0600
As I look back at this topic, the ARRL actions and the arguments seen here are about the same ones as in 1995, but at that time, the winlink/pactor intention was a bit more obvious. This time it's a
/archives//html/RTTY/2013-11/msg00158.html (12,775 bytes)

151. Re: [RTTY] ARRL attack on current RTTY users (score: 1)
Author: "Jeff Blaine" <keepwalking188@yahoo.com>
Date: Sat, 23 Nov 2013 00:55:11 -0600
I guess this is the thing that has me curious - the end user. All the years I've been a ham (40?), the rule was that communications could not be encrypted. That communication was primarily point to p
/archives//html/RTTY/2013-11/msg00161.html (15,377 bytes)

152. Re: [RTTY] ARRL attack on current RTTY users (score: 1)
Author: "Jeff Blaine" <keepwalking188@yahoo.com>
Date: Sat, 23 Nov 2013 00:58:47 -0600
My apologies to the board - I meant 2005, not 1995 in my prior email. Sorry for the confusion. 73/jeff/ac0c www.ac0c.com alpha-charlie-zero-charlie --Original Message-- From: Jeff Blaine Sent: Saturd
/archives//html/RTTY/2013-11/msg00162.html (13,784 bytes)

153. Re: [RTTY] ARRL attack on current RTTY users (score: 1)
Author: "Jeff Blaine" <keepwalking188@yahoo.com>
Date: Sat, 23 Nov 2013 10:04:51 -0600
I don't think this is somehow an enhancement to enable secure coms utilization by hams for emcom. That sort of move would be pushed by the feds asking for the ARRL endorsement as an avenue to get ham
/archives//html/RTTY/2013-11/msg00168.html (19,968 bytes)

154. Re: [RTTY] ARRL attack on current RTTY users (score: 1)
Author: "Jeff Blaine" <keepwalking188@yahoo.com>
Date: Sat, 23 Nov 2013 10:25:08 -0600
This is an interesting page: http://www.arwatch.com/arwblog/?p=128 73/jeff/ac0c www.ac0c.com alpha-charlie-zero-charlie Just FYI I started a thread on this subject in the digital forum on e-ham awhil
/archives//html/RTTY/2013-11/msg00169.html (9,039 bytes)

155. Re: [RTTY] ARRL attack on current RTTY users (score: 1)
Author: "Jeff Blaine" <keepwalking188@yahoo.com>
Date: Sat, 23 Nov 2013 12:13:59 -0600
The guys promoting the winlink/pactor 4 stuff keep talking about improved emcom support. But I'm not sure how these two items tie together. Can someone explain how the emcom needs are not met with th
/archives//html/RTTY/2013-11/msg00173.html (12,204 bytes)

156. Re: [RTTY] ARRL attack on current RTTY users (score: 1)
Author: "Jeff Blaine" <keepwalking188@yahoo.com>
Date: Sat, 23 Nov 2013 12:25:25 -0600
The guys promoting the winlink/pactor 4 stuff keep talking about improved emcom support. But I'm not sure how these two items tie together. Can someone explain how the emcom needs are not met with th
/archives//html/RTTY/2013-11/msg00175.html (12,124 bytes)

157. Re: [RTTY] ARRL attack on current RTTY users (score: 1)
Author: "Jeff Blaine" <keepwalking188@yahoo.com>
Date: Sat, 23 Nov 2013 19:55:03 -0600
John, I'm not Ray Charlies. And this is not a trick question. I really would like to have a clear answer to that question. And I would appreciate if you (or someone else) could explain it? 73/jeff/ac
/archives//html/RTTY/2013-11/msg00206.html (11,107 bytes)

158. Re: [RTTY] ARRL attack on current RTTY users (score: 1)
Author: "Jeff Blaine" <keepwalking188@yahoo.com>
Date: Sat, 23 Nov 2013 20:13:05 -0600
Don, I think you have hit it again. There are two issues here. 1. Defeat of the current proposal. This is not the time to debate it or change it. The FCC is lined up to approve this unless significan
/archives//html/RTTY/2013-11/msg00208.html (14,777 bytes)

159. Re: [RTTY] ARRL attack on current RTTY users (score: 1)
Author: "Jeff Blaine" <keepwalking188@yahoo.com>
Date: Sat, 23 Nov 2013 20:38:19 -0600
Dave, I hope you are right. But it seems to me that the case (auto vs. remote control stations are two different beasts) is contingent on either the FCC having explicitly defined these two things in
/archives//html/RTTY/2013-11/msg00211.html (13,147 bytes)

160. Re: [RTTY] ARRL attack on current RTTY users (score: 1)
Author: "Jeff Blaine" <keepwalking188@yahoo.com>
Date: Sat, 23 Nov 2013 20:54:25 -0600
That's great news Dave! 73/jeff/ac0c www.ac0c.com alpha-charlie-zero-charlie --Original Message-- From: Dave AA6YQ Sent: Saturday, November 23, 2013 8:48 PM To: 'Jeff Blaine' Cc: 'Ron Kolarik' ; 'RTT
/archives//html/RTTY/2013-11/msg00213.html (13,678 bytes)

Current List: 141 - 160
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9]
This search system is powered by Namazu