- 121. Re: [RTTY] WPX suggestion (score: 1)
- Author: "Jeff Blaine" <keepwalking188@yahoo.com>
- Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2013 17:58:28 -0600
- Bill, There is only a double penalty on the first 9 qso. And a single character penalty on the balance 91. So the total time loss is a fraction of the 11 minutes. Right? 73/jeff/ac0c www.ac0c.com alp
- /archives//html/RTTY/2013-02/msg00061.html (10,310 bytes)
- 122. Re: [RTTY] AA5AU Contest Notes now multi computer n1mm SO#R (score: 1)
- Author: "Jeff Blaine" <keepwalking188@yahoo.com>
- Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2013 21:04:40 -0600
- There is nothing wrong with this. Single ops do just fine. Search on K4GMH in the single op category and you can see what a good op can do. 73/jeff/ac0c www.ac0c.com alpha-charlie-zero-charlie On Feb
- /archives//html/RTTY/2013-02/msg00325.html (11,274 bytes)
- 123. Re: [RTTY] AA5AU Contest Notes now multi computer n1mm SO#R (score: 1)
- Author: "Jeff Blaine" <keepwalking188@yahoo.com>
- Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2013 21:20:03 -0600
- That's his CURRENT setup. Look at the 3830 history or in the WPX/RU standings for 2011 and earlier. 73/jeff/ac0c www.ac0c.com alpha-charlie-zero-charlie 73/jeff/ac0c You mean this ????? Current home
- /archives//html/RTTY/2013-02/msg00327.html (10,644 bytes)
- 124. Re: [RTTY] AA5AU Contest Notes now multi computer n1mm SO#R (score: 1)
- Author: "Jeff Blaine" <keepwalking188@yahoo.com>
- Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2013 22:11:09 -0600
- This subject has drifted way off topic. So I will give my concluding rant. If you want to run So1R, then do it. I ran So1r and then So2V on a single amp/rig for a couple of years. If you want to run
- /archives//html/RTTY/2013-02/msg00330.html (13,159 bytes)
- 125. Re: [RTTY] AA5AU Contest Notes now multi computer n1mm SO#R (score: 1)
- Author: "Jeff Blaine" <keepwalking188@yahoo.com>
- Date: Sat, 16 Feb 2013 10:33:52 -0600
- So2V is another alternative if the rig has a separate RX. That way you can run and S&P on the same band at the same time. Without any special hardware, other than the line needed to connect the AF fe
- /archives//html/RTTY/2013-02/msg00339.html (9,428 bytes)
- 126. Re: [RTTY] 2Tone vs. MMTTY - Round 2 testing (score: 1)
- Author: "Jeff Blaine" <keepwalking188@yahoo.com>
- Date: Sat, 16 Feb 2013 17:12:01 -0600
- Very interesting, Don. I wonder how much of a factor the pre-filtering on the rig side is. A check at some wider bandwidth (500 hz with a flat single standard bandpass) feeding the decoder array woul
- /archives//html/RTTY/2013-02/msg00347.html (11,507 bytes)
- 127. Re: [RTTY] K3 reduced-bandwidth RTTY analysis (score: 1)
- Author: "Jeff Blaine" <keepwalking188@yahoo.com>
- Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2013 20:38:40 -0500
- Very nice work, Andy... 73/jeff/ac0c www.ac0c.com alpha-charlie-zero-charlie Hello again, I have finally gotten around to finishing up a short analysis of the reduced-bandwidth FSK keying in the K3.
- /archives//html/RTTY/2013-03/msg00155.html (8,892 bytes)
- 128. Re: [RTTY] My thoughts on RTTY analysis (score: 1)
- Author: "Jeff Blaine" <keepwalking188@yahoo.com>
- Date: Sat, 23 Mar 2013 19:00:50 -0500
- The bandwidth thing gets a bad name. It's really not in anyone's best interest to have a wide signal, including your own. One reason for that is the fat signal is harder to tune. That means guys trac
- /archives//html/RTTY/2013-03/msg00182.html (11,548 bytes)
- 129. Re: [RTTY] My thoughts on RTTY analysis (score: 1)
- Author: "Jeff Blaine" <keepwalking188@yahoo.com>
- Date: Sat, 23 Mar 2013 20:58:53 -0500
- Bill, Yea, I understand the sidebands due to the modulation. Plenty of fat signals out there to go with the skinny ones of equal amplitude though. A bandscope shows the good, bad and ugly in living c
- /archives//html/RTTY/2013-03/msg00184.html (9,779 bytes)
- 130. Re: [RTTY] Field Day Digital: PSK vs RTTY (score: 1)
- Author: "Jeff Blaine" <keepwalking188@yahoo.com>
- Date: Fri, 5 Jul 2013 03:12:09 -0500
- Problem I've had with PSK31 is that it's a considered a "chat" mode by a lot of guys - and they just cannot help but run that brag tape. As more ops get it into their heads that they need to have a c
- /archives//html/RTTY/2013-07/msg00017.html (12,969 bytes)
- 131. Re: [RTTY] contest change (score: 1)
- Author: "Jeff Blaine" <keepwalking188@yahoo.com>
- Date: Tue, 9 Jul 2013 06:08:35 -0500
- Good point Shelby,But I can see how guys would view it that way. Different contest conditions combined with different prop condx gives each contest a personality it's own. I consider the fall CQ RTTY
- /archives//html/RTTY/2013-07/msg00071.html (10,778 bytes)
- 132. Re: [RTTY] ARRL issues Official Reply: Re 2.8KHz HF digital BW (score: 1)
- Author: "Jeff Blaine" <keepwalking188@yahoo.com>
- Date: Sat, 27 Jul 2013 20:31:42 -0500
- If I ready it right, I think that Joes original point was that this could turn into a step which would allow an easier path for commercial or unregulated use of the bands. While bandwidth vs. mode as
- /archives//html/RTTY/2013-07/msg00140.html (13,163 bytes)
- 133. Re: [RTTY] ARRL and band/mode awards (score: 1)
- Author: "Jeff Blaine" <keepwalking188@yahoo.com>
- Date: Sun, 28 Jul 2013 10:25:45 -0500
- Bill, I have always wondered how the League keeps in sync with the interests and desires of it's members? 73/jeff/ac0c www.ac0c.com alpha-charlie-zero-charlie I wonder why the ARRL is so determined t
- /archives//html/RTTY/2013-07/msg00149.html (8,589 bytes)
- 134. Re: [RTTY] 300hz or 500hz IF filter? (score: 1)
- Author: "Jeff Blaine" <keepwalking188@yahoo.com>
- Date: Fri, 23 Aug 2013 17:25:25 -0500
- Getting back to the original query - I think the answer to this question depends on the primary use. The guy says it's a portable rig. But he does not go beyond that. I don't know - but my guess with
- /archives//html/RTTY/2013-08/msg00112.html (17,717 bytes)
- 135. Re: [RTTY] 300hz or 500hz IF filter? (score: 1)
- Author: "Jeff Blaine" <keepwalking188@yahoo.com>
- Date: Mon, 26 Aug 2013 10:51:27 +0900
- That busted call observation is a pretty good point, Joe. Especially for a contest where the copy is not necessarily great to begin with (like the CQ DX RTTY, etc). 73/jeff/ac0c www.ac0c.com alpha-ch
- /archives//html/RTTY/2013-08/msg00144.html (15,137 bytes)
- 136. Re: [RTTY] To DE or not to DE (score: 1)
- Author: "Jeff Blaine" <keepwalking188@yahoo.com>
- Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2013 19:22:12 -0500
- Great advice! 73/jeff/ac0c www.ac0c.com alpha-charlie-zero-charlie If you're from Delaware, you may use DE to your heart's content and everyone will love you for it. No one else in the known universe
- /archives//html/RTTY/2013-09/msg00114.html (8,361 bytes)
- 137. [RTTY] CQ WW RTTY Contest Next Weekend (score: 1)
- Author: "Jeff Blaine" <keepwalking188@yahoo.com>
- Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2013 12:36:54 -0500
- What's the practice session(s) plan? 73/jeff/ac0c www.ac0c.com alpha-charlie-zero-charlie The most popular RTTY contest of the year is less than a week away. Over 15,000 different call signs are expe
- /archives//html/RTTY/2013-09/msg00120.html (11,179 bytes)
- 138. Re: [RTTY] To DE or not to DE (score: 1)
- Author: "Jeff Blaine" <keepwalking188@yahoo.com>
- Date: Sun, 29 Sep 2013 09:26:14 -0500
- It's very simple. 1. If DE as a state name can be a required part of the contest exchange... 2. Then under NO CIRCUMSTANCES should DE be used as part of the exchange. 3. There are no exceptions. Gene
- /archives//html/RTTY/2013-09/msg00134.html (10,590 bytes)
- 139. Re: [RTTY] Contest Hints (score: 1)
- Author: "Jeff Blaine" <keepwalking188@yahoo.com>
- Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2013 12:17:53 -0500
- Good point. Is it necessary to edit the call? Had a few /QRP guys here also. I had it in my mind that the general rule is what goes in the log is exactly what was sent/copied. Never thought about it
- /archives//html/RTTY/2013-09/msg00176.html (10,801 bytes)
- 140. Re: [RTTY] Courtesy (score: 1)
- Author: "Jeff Blaine" <keepwalking188@yahoo.com>
- Date: Tue, 1 Oct 2013 11:09:56 -0500
- I can think of one reason a guy would answer a QSO with a CQ. Op error. It's pretty easy to get out of sync and hit the wrong button or click on the wrong thing. Especially in So2r. Especially with l
- /archives//html/RTTY/2013-10/msg00007.html (9,577 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu