Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:keepwalking188@ac0c.com: 156 ]

Total 156 documents matching your query.

101. Re: [RTTY] Soundcard Interface shootout? (score: 1)
Author: "Jeff AC0C" <keepwalking188@ac0c.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2016 18:04:07 -0500
Peter, I went down this road. Ready to build my own, having built a basic box the first go around. How hard can it be? The answer is that the more advanced your needs become, the more complex this pr
/archives//html/RTTY/2016-08/msg00118.html (8,029 bytes)

102. Re: [RTTY] Soundcard Interface shootout? (score: 1)
Author: "Jeff AC0C" <keepwalking188@ac0c.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2016 19:42:30 -0500
I don't think there is much difference in the sound card at the macro level. The generic sound card in the average PC (or the $15 dongle) gets you a lot of dynamic range. And given most guys run the
/archives//html/RTTY/2016-08/msg00122.html (10,558 bytes)

103. Re: [RTTY] NA RTTY Bonehead Move (score: 1)
Author: "Jeff AC0C" <keepwalking188@ac0c.com>
Date: Sun, 18 Sep 2016 11:46:26 -0500
I'm sure it was no problem Lee. It was my first go at a Sprint also. 73/jeff/ac0c www.ac0c.com alpha-charlie-zero-charlie Ed, It was great working you for the NA Sprint contest. Wonderful signal. Eve
/archives//html/RTTY/2016-09/msg00045.html (10,213 bytes)

104. Re: [RTTY] Q Rate Killers (score: 1)
Author: "Jeff AC0C" <keepwalking188@ac0c.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2016 20:16:22 -0500
Tom, The exchange content for peak efficiency is just on the border where you are infrequently asked for a fill. If you almost never get a request, then I would say your content is too redundant. Kee
/archives//html/RTTY/2016-09/msg00084.html (9,953 bytes)

105. Re: [RTTY] Rate killer/QRP (score: 1)
Author: "Jeff AC0C" <keepwalking188@ac0c.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2016 13:24:03 -0500
This is not a rate killer. Either you can hear the guy well enough to get minimal print, or you can't. If he's in there but not strong enough, then just keep running. If he's not strong enough to pri
/archives//html/RTTY/2016-09/msg00113.html (9,637 bytes)

106. Re: [RTTY] Q Rate Killers--One Ham's Thoughts (score: 1)
Author: "Jeff AC0C" <keepwalking188@ac0c.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2016 13:28:28 -0500
Great article Hank. The "DE DE" (don't use DE for anything except a state) issue and the "QSO B4" (log em all, even if they seem to be dupes) are lessons that need to be put on a rookie RTTY contesti
/archives//html/RTTY/2016-09/msg00114.html (18,326 bytes)

107. Re: [RTTY] Q Rate Killers (score: 1)
Author: "Jeff AC0C" <keepwalking188@ac0c.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2016 13:30:24 -0500
This is a W0YK talking point. I think he calls it "slow down to speed up" or something. 73/jeff/ac0c www.ac0c.com alpha-charlie-zero-charlie Another thought. Sometimes there were so many stations cal
/archives//html/RTTY/2016-09/msg00115.html (11,177 bytes)

108. Re: [RTTY] QRP in contests (score: 1)
Author: "Jeff AC0C" <keepwalking188@ac0c.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2016 20:35:39 -0500
I agree with that "you would be surprised what you can work" statement on QRP. Our local club worked QRP/battery one field day and as a QRO guy I was stunned at both the rate and the relative ease in
/archives//html/RTTY/2016-09/msg00131.html (8,706 bytes)

109. Re: [RTTY] RYRY Anonymous Group (score: 1)
Author: "Jeff AC0C" <keepwalking188@ac0c.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2016 08:45:31 +0800
Better come up with a different term to describe the affliction though... 73/jeff/ac0c www.ac0c.com alpha-charlie-zero-charlie Hi. My name is Ken and I'm a compulsive diddler. AB1J In fact I am think
/archives//html/RTTY/2016-10/msg00251.html (9,421 bytes)

110. Re: [RTTY] New Radio (score: 1)
Author: "Jeff AC0C" <keepwalking188@ac0c.com>
Date: Sun, 23 Oct 2016 16:54:33 -0500
The Icom is a good radio but generally speaking the FSK waveform is pretty (and in some cases amazingly) fat for that make especially. AFSK - or better yet using David's 2Tone application for transmi
/archives//html/RTTY/2016-10/msg00298.html (10,611 bytes)

111. Re: [RTTY] 2Tone (score: 1)
Author: "Jeff AC0C" <keepwalking188@ac0c.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2016 15:42:43 -0500
I believe that Chen and David say DOOK is the best. 73/jeff/ac0c www.ac0c.com alpha-charlie-zero-charlie Hi Jeff, Which of the 2Tone RTTY keying methods are you referring to? TX AFSK: TX DOOK: TX pFS
/archives//html/RTTY/2016-10/msg00312.html (8,218 bytes)

112. Re: [RTTY] FSK is bad? (score: 1)
Author: "Jeff AC0C" <keepwalking188@ac0c.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2016 16:09:31 -0500
I think this list of Al's is right but the conclusion is pessimistic and not in the traditional ham spirit. There are so many good signals on the bands now days that when you run across a guy who's s
/archives//html/RTTY/2016-10/msg00313.html (12,574 bytes)

113. Re: [RTTY] FSK is bad? (score: 1)
Author: "Jeff AC0C" <keepwalking188@ac0c.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2016 16:59:43 -0500
You change the shaping by moving from FSK where you have zero control over to AFSK where you have full control. Another advantage of AFSK is that you get to set the tone pair where it sounds good to
/archives//html/RTTY/2016-10/msg00341.html (11,698 bytes)

114. Re: [RTTY] FSK is bad? (score: 1)
Author: "Jeff AC0C" <keepwalking188@ac0c.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2016 18:49:36 -0500
That's true. But you do have a few good software choices in the case of AFSK, and the change from one to the next is not too painful. In the case of FSK, if you don't like what you have, only a rig c
/archives//html/RTTY/2016-10/msg00347.html (9,162 bytes)

115. Re: [RTTY] Really? (score: 1)
Author: "Jeff AC0C" <keepwalking188@ac0c.com>
Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2016 19:48:01 -0600
The world's skin is way too thin these days. If you don't like what a guy has to say, just ignore it. Or delete it. There is no right to have the topics on these reflectors customized just your way.
/archives//html/RTTY/2016-11/msg00034.html (10,304 bytes)

116. Re: [RTTY] Really? (score: 1)
Author: "Jeff AC0C" <keepwalking188@ac0c.com>
Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2016 20:00:04 -0600
My comment was not aimed at anyone. If it was unclear on which comment I was replying too, it was the post by W4AAW. I believe he's the one complaining about a guy trying to work out his RTTY issues.
/archives//html/RTTY/2016-11/msg00036.html (11,929 bytes)

117. Re: [RTTY] P49X Wine Challenge 2016 (score: 1)
Author: "Jeff AC0C" <keepwalking188@ac0c.com>
Date: Sun, 13 Nov 2016 21:01:48 -0600
Good joke, Thom. 73/jeff/ac0c www.ac0c.com alpha-charlie-zero-charlie Never even heard P49X, anywhere. 73 Thom KI8W On 11/14/2016 02:50, Ed Muns wrote: The following stations qualified for the 9-band
/archives//html/RTTY/2016-11/msg00115.html (8,497 bytes)

118. Re: [RTTY] P49X Wine Challenge 2016 (score: 1)
Author: "Jeff AC0C" <keepwalking188@ac0c.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2016 00:29:51 -0600
Thom, I thought you were making a joke but a fellow reminded me that you were new to RTTY contesting and may now know who P49X is. You would not be misrepresenting the situation to summarize it this
/archives//html/RTTY/2016-11/msg00119.html (9,680 bytes)

119. Re: [RTTY] P49X Wine Challenge 2016 (score: 1)
Author: "Jeff AC0C" <keepwalking188@ac0c.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2016 11:05:20 -0600
Ed lives on the left coast squashing grapes but goes down to the islands for contesting so in a way the call is inactive. Now the days there is a contest on, he's banging out 2500/day there operating
/archives//html/RTTY/2016-11/msg00125.html (11,689 bytes)

120. Re: [RTTY] [N1MMLoggerplus] 2Tone update released (score: 1)
Author: "Jeff AC0C" <keepwalking188@ac0c.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2016 15:36:57 -0600
Thanks David for your continued work on this project! 73/jeff/ac0c www.ac0c.com alpha-charlie-zero-charlie I have just uploaded a new version of 2Tone. It can be found here: https://groups.yahoo.com/
/archives//html/RTTY/2016-11/msg00144.html (10,286 bytes)

Current List: 101 - 120
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8]
This search system is powered by Namazu