Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:keepwalking188@ac0c.com: 156 ]

Total 156 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [RTTY] FT5ZM RTTY is a zoo (score: 1)
Author: "Jeff AC0C" <keepwalking188@ac0c.com>
Date: Sun, 2 Feb 2014 14:39:36 -0600
I saw the same thing on the "gentlemen's band" 160m with FT5. I would normally suspect that it's the casual op who's poking into a mode or band he's not accustomed to working. But there is no excuse
/archives//html/RTTY/2014-02/msg00012.html (8,494 bytes)

2. Re: [RTTY] Arrl requests digital mode comments (score: 1)
Author: "Jeff AC0C" <keepwalking188@ac0c.com>
Date: Mon, 3 Mar 2014 08:33:26 +0900
Why worry? It says right there in the ARRL petition, "...and if you like your (outdated, obsolete, antiquated) RTTY, then you can KEEP YOUR RTTY. PERIOD." 73/jeff/ac0c www.ac0c.com alpha-charlie-zero
/archives//html/RTTY/2014-03/msg00007.html (10,969 bytes)

3. Re: [RTTY] Arrl requests digital mode comments (score: 1)
Author: "Jeff AC0C" <keepwalking188@ac0c.com>
Date: Mon, 3 Mar 2014 08:52:41 +0900
It's not intended to be funny. It's more of an outrage. But the parallel is accurate. Just as in the case of 11708, the ARRL is advocating changes which would affect ALL of the US hams should the FCC
/archives//html/RTTY/2014-03/msg00010.html (12,949 bytes)

4. Re: [RTTY] RM-11708 Vision of the future (score: 1)
Author: "Jeff AC0C" <keepwalking188@ac0c.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2014 12:06:45 -0500
Paul, Everyone's opinion should be represented and respected. But you may get a more sympathetic response if you were to counter with some facts of your own - or at least some creativity (which Terry
/archives//html/RTTY/2014-03/msg00077.html (11,139 bytes)

5. Re: [RTTY] List of Winlink stations (score: 1)
Author: "Jeff AC0C" <keepwalking188@ac0c.com>
Date: Sun, 16 Mar 2014 10:16:02 -0500
John, Ah, if it were only so in reality. Winlink interprets the subband restriction as specifically **not** applying to their system. See paragraph #2 on this page: http://www.winlink.org/guidelines
/archives//html/RTTY/2014-03/msg00122.html (9,075 bytes)

6. Re: [RTTY] Lack of RTTY on 40 and 80 Meters (score: 1)
Author: "Jeff AC0C" <keepwalking188@ac0c.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2014 12:11:03 -0500
I agree with Tom. If a guy wants to work stateside 160m, you don't need a monster to get some kind of a signal out. At one point I ran 160m from a loaded dipole in my attic. Never did much DX with th
/archives//html/RTTY/2014-03/msg00283.html (11,216 bytes)

7. Re: [RTTY] VK9MT - inexperienced op??? (score: 1)
Author: "Jeff AC0C" <keepwalking188@ac0c.com>
Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2014 23:20:06 -0500
This is an easy one. Focus your efforts to work them on another band. And keep an eye on the Clublog upload. When the next update comes out, see if your Q shows up. If your call does not show up, the
/archives//html/RTTY/2014-04/msg00001.html (9,428 bytes)

8. Re: [RTTY] W1AW/x RTTY operations (score: 1)
Author: "Jeff AC0C" <keepwalking188@ac0c.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2014 15:15:34 -0500
Look for KS on RTTY from here in Sept. 73/jeff/ac0c www.ac0c.com alpha-charlie-zero-charlie --Original Message-- From: W0MU Sent: Thursday, April 10, 2014 2:57 PM To: rtty@contesting.com Subject: Re:
/archives//html/RTTY/2014-04/msg00053.html (10,959 bytes)

9. Re: [RTTY] MINUTES OF ARRL EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE (score: 1)
Author: "Jeff AC0C" <keepwalking188@ac0c.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2014 12:38:38 -0500
So either you 1) support the ARRL (and are are one smart cookie!) - or 2) you are uninformed, misunderstanding the clear and obvious benefits of the ARRL position. Sounds just like the kind of nonsen
/archives//html/RTTY/2014-04/msg00093.html (21,783 bytes)

10. Re: [RTTY] Is it just me? (score: 1)
Author: "Jeff AC0C" <keepwalking188@ac0c.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2014 14:50:14 -0500
I would buy a button and wear it. 73/jeff/ac0c www.ac0c.com alpha-charlie-zero-charlie --Original Message-- From: Jeff Stai Sent: Wednesday, April 16, 2014 2:47 PM To: Don AA5AU Cc: rtty@contesting.c
/archives//html/RTTY/2014-04/msg00131.html (13,059 bytes)

11. Re: [RTTY] RTTY Digest, Vol 136, Issue 24 (score: 1)
Author: "Jeff AC0C" <keepwalking188@ac0c.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2014 14:55:49 -0500
I would buy! 73/jeff/ac0c www.ac0c.com alpha-charlie-zero-charlie --Original Message-- From: Ron Kolarik Sent: Wednesday, April 16, 2014 12:38 PM To: steve@nr4m.com Cc: rtty@contesting.com Subject: R
/archives//html/RTTY/2014-04/msg00133.html (9,355 bytes)

12. Re: [RTTY] Suggested RM-11708Letter Needed (score: 1)
Author: "Jeff AC0C" <keepwalking188@ac0c.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2014 14:57:16 -0500
Paul, The problem is the FCC does not like form letters - they consider it spam. And the ARRL will want to lump a form letter from X-number of guys into one as well. It's best if you write it out jus
/archives//html/RTTY/2014-04/msg00134.html (9,921 bytes)

13. Re: [RTTY] Is it just me? (score: 1)
Author: "Jeff AC0C" <keepwalking188@ac0c.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2014 14:57:54 -0500
Very nice! 73/jeff/ac0c www.ac0c.com alpha-charlie-zero-charlie --Original Message-- From: Steve Bookout Sent: Wednesday, April 16, 2014 2:55 PM To: rtty@contesting.com Subject: Re: [RTTY] Is it just
/archives//html/RTTY/2014-04/msg00135.html (13,644 bytes)

14. Re: [RTTY] RM-11708 Outside US (score: 1)
Author: "Jeff AC0C" <keepwalking188@ac0c.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2014 10:15:01 -0500
Michael, I suggest you contact the RSGB as well. While the ARRL is asking (now) for inputs on the digital modes stuff, their minds have been made up regarding where this should go for years now. The
/archives//html/RTTY/2014-04/msg00176.html (8,642 bytes)

15. Re: [RTTY] New Winlink usage (score: 1)
Author: "Jeff AC0C" <keepwalking188@ac0c.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2014 18:43:43 -0500
I saw a winlink (it was pactor of some flavor but since you can't decode the stuff, you don't really know) session fire up in the middle of a big dxpedition pileup a few weeks back - on 17m. There we
/archives//html/RTTY/2014-04/msg00324.html (12,516 bytes)

16. Re: [RTTY] New Winlink usage (score: 1)
Author: "Jeff AC0C" <keepwalking188@ac0c.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2014 20:57:41 -0500
Ron, Yes, you finally figured it out!!! You are misinformed and as such, clearly misinterpreting what is an obviously good program proposed by the ARRL - who knows the circumstances and future much b
/archives//html/RTTY/2014-04/msg00332.html (12,205 bytes)

17. Re: [RTTY] RM-11708 Buttons (score: 1)
Author: "Jeff AC0C" <keepwalking188@ac0c.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2014 14:16:01 -0500
I got mine also. Many thanks Steve! 73/jeff/ac0c www.ac0c.com alpha-charlie-zero-charlie Many thanks to Steve, NR4M for the RM-11708 buttons. I received two of them in the mail today. Rest assured th
/archives//html/RTTY/2014-04/msg00448.html (7,476 bytes)

18. Re: [RTTY] [DFWcontest] Please forward this far and wide, its important if you care about CW and RTTY (score: 1)
Author: "Jeff AC0C" <keepwalking188@ac0c.com>
Date: Fri, 2 May 2014 12:04:01 -0500
The leagues "experimentation" argument is completely without support. ZERO. Why? 1. The rest of the ham world (for the most part) has no 300 baud limit. 2. If there were theoretical modes of interest
/archives//html/RTTY/2014-05/msg00008.html (21,323 bytes)

19. Re: [RTTY] Problems with AFSK ... (score: 1)
Author: "Jeff AC0C" <keepwalking188@ac0c.com>
Date: Mon, 26 May 2014 21:02:16 -0500
Now THAT is funny! But it also has some unfortunate truth. 73/jeff/ac0c www.ac0c.com alpha-charlie-zero-charlie Looks legal to me. Less than 2.8 kHz ;-) 8-) Lest anyone doubt the problems with AFSK a
/archives//html/RTTY/2014-05/msg00189.html (8,682 bytes)

20. Re: [RTTY] [Gmc] Fwd: RE: ARRL W1AW Bulletin Operations (score: 1)
Author: "Jeff AC0C" <keepwalking188@ac0c.com>
Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2014 14:58:25 -0500
Dave, You are better of to debate the issue by arguing your objective viewpoint and advocating your solutions. And I see your call in my log quite a few times - so I know you have a personal interest
/archives//html/RTTY/2014-06/msg00061.html (26,588 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8]
This search system is powered by Namazu