Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:ke4qok@bellsouth.net: 14 ]

Total 14 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [RTTY] [CQ-Contest] Looking for possibly busted calls (score: 1)
Author: <ke4qok@bellsouth.net>
Date: Mon, 3 Oct 2005 16:50:00 -0400
I got my CQ this week and I think my QST came around that time as well. Bob _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/l
/archives//html/RTTY/2005-10/msg00038.html (7,648 bytes)

2. Re: [RTTY] RTTY on Six Meters (score: 1)
Author: <ke4qok@bellsouth.net>
Date: Fri, 2 Dec 2005 8:31:19 -0500
Here is the web address for the "Digital on Six" (DOS) group. It is a good source for additional info and for input on avoiding conflicts between differnent modes on the band. http://www.ykc.com/wa5u
/archives//html/RTTY/2005-12/msg00009.html (8,748 bytes)

3. Re: [RTTY] my first & only comment on packet (score: 1)
Author: <ke4qok@bellsouth.net>
Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2005 13:11:59 -0500
Amen, brother! Bob KE4QOK _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
/archives//html/RTTY/2005-12/msg00112.html (9,278 bytes)

4. Re: [RTTY] Radio interference problem (score: 1)
Author: <ke4qok@bellsouth.net>
Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2005 9:04:56 -0500
Have you tried wrapping the monitor cable with foil. Not all video cables are created equal. If this does not help try wrapping the monitor making sure to slit the or punch the foil for all of the ve
/archives//html/RTTY/2005-12/msg00309.html (9,417 bytes)

5. Re: [RTTY] Is West Virginia rare??? (score: 1)
Author: <ke4qok@bellsouth.net>
Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2006 13:40:07 -0500
You are the first WV station I have heard in the last two years. Bob KE4QOK _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/l
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-01/msg00140.html (8,254 bytes)

6. Re: [RTTY] QSL'ing (score: 1)
Author: <ke4qok@bellsouth.net>
Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2006 9:22:53 -0500
I agree totally Tom. I QSL every new contact on every band in the US with a SASE. And I QSL direct to every country on every band with return envelopes and postage until I have the country confirmed.
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-01/msg00569.html (9,051 bytes)

7. Re: [RTTY] thats very sad Gert (score: 1)
Author: <ke4qok@bellsouth.net>
Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2006 8:37:43 -0500
This is a good point Bob, but I have mixed feelings sometimes. It's kind of like discussing whether or not the a preacher should behave better than the congregation in general. These folks have been
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-01/msg00608.html (12,414 bytes)

8. Re: [RTTY] Interfere with CW (score: 1)
Author: <ke4qok@bellsouth.net>
Date: Thu, 2 Feb 2006 8:26:18 -0500
I looked at some of this guy correspondence online and in one place he describe his RTTY setup so I don't think he hates RTTY and I really don't think he just hate contesters. I think the word we're
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-02/msg00014.html (8,009 bytes)

9. Re: [RTTY] West Virginia & Delaware on LOTW (score: 1)
Author: <ke4qok@bellsouth.net>
Date: Mon, 6 Feb 2006 8:32:56 -0500
There's no reason you can't do that too. Bob KE4QOK _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-02/msg00072.html (8,010 bytes)

10. Re: [RTTY] RTTY on 160 Meters (score: 1)
Author: <ke4qok@bellsouth.net>
Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2006 14:19:55 -0500
It may not be as hard as you think to maintain a good QSO count on 160M. There are probably a lot of people out there that have few if any RTTY contacts on this band and would like to get some in the
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-02/msg00399.html (9,736 bytes)

11. Re: [RTTY] Answering QSL's (score: 1)
Author: <ke4qok@bellsouth.net>
Date: Thu, 9 Mar 2006 8:39:09 -0500
Tom, I would guess that about 98% of my cards are in reply to sent cards but I still check them against the log. You would be suprised at the things that show up from time to time. Since I send SASEs
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-03/msg00151.html (9,037 bytes)

12. Re: [RTTY] SO1R and SO2R (score: 1)
Author: <ke4qok@bellsouth.net>
Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2006 8:28:01 -0400
I think I have the answer to this whole dilemma. There are still some open dates left in the year so someone can create and administer a new contest with rules that "level the field". No matter how t
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-07/msg00480.html (8,401 bytes)

13. Re: [RTTY] observations of a tiny group (score: 1)
Author: <ke4qok@bellsouth.net>
Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2006 13:52:55 -0400
AA MMM MMM EEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE NNN NN AA AA MM MM MM MM EE NN NN NN AAAAAAAAAAA MM MMMM MM EEEEEEEEEE NN NN NN AA AA MM MM MM EE NN NN NN AA AA MM MM MM EEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE NN NNN _________________________
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-08/msg00010.html (8,792 bytes)

14. Re: [RTTY] $$$$$$ Collector (score: 1)
Author: "Bob Roach" <ke4qok@bellsouth.net>
Date: Sat, 11 Nov 2006 13:23:54 -0000
I missed the beginning of this thread but I think I have been able to get the gist of the conversation from the last couple of messages and I have to speak my piece. (My apologies in advance if you d
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-11/msg00058.html (8,756 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu