- 1. [RTTY] Thanks (score: 198)
- Author: k8vt at ameritech.net (Carter Grabarczyk)
- Date: Sat Jul 26 10:20:39 2003
- Thanks to all who worked us and to the ARRL for the certificate for first place in Michigan and 9th in the U.S. in the 2003 ARRL RTTY Roundup low power multi-op category. Looks like there is hope for
- /archives//html/RTTY/2003-07/msg00234.html (6,379 bytes)
- 2. [RTTY] Fun with ADIF (score: 198)
- Author: k8vt at ameritech.net (Carter Grabarczyk)
- Date: Thu May 8 08:13:14 2003
- Bill, Good tip and thanks for publishing it. I've done this numerous times when taking Writelog files and moving them into DX4Win. However, you are being waaaaay too hard on yourself. You do *NOT* ha
- /archives//html/RTTY/2003-05/msg00042.html (9,632 bytes)
- 3. [RTTY] PSK31 (was Death of RTTY) (score: 198)
- Author: k8vt at ameritech.net (Carter Grabarczyk)
- Date: Wed May 21 13:57:37 2003
- Ed, You bring up an interesting point... When Peter Martinez (?) co-invented PSK31, his software received a single station at a time, tuning was critical and you could crank in your 250 Hz filter (or
- /archives//html/RTTY/2003-05/msg00157.html (7,484 bytes)
- 4. [RTTY] SO2R (again) (score: 198)
- Author: k8vt at ameritech.net (Carter Grabarczyk)
- Date: Sat Jan 25 09:42:07 2003
- But that's NOT the point. We have separate classes for high power and low power and nobody argues with that. However, that's not to say that a low power guy couldn't do well, but again, not the point
- /archives//html/RTTY/2003-01/msg00344.html (10,163 bytes)
- 5. [RTTY] SO2R (again) (score: 198)
- Author: k8vt at ameritech.net (Carter Grabarczyk)
- Date: Sat Jan 25 10:25:34 2003
- Barry, Respectfully, to your statement above, I say "Bunk"... Does having a high power/low power or single op/ multi op category "stifle progress and competition"? I think not (or at least I haven't
- /archives//html/RTTY/2003-01/msg00345.html (10,084 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu