Mail Archive Search: <+from:k4ww at arrl.net>

Results:

References: [ +from:k4ww: 698 ] [ at (Too many documents hit. Ignored) ] [ arrl.net: 150 ]

Total 53 documents matching your query.

41. [RTTY] NAQP Team (score: 136): Author: k4ww at arrl.net (Shelby Summerville); Date: Sat Feb 22 06:13:28 2003; As 2X4's are an important feature in building "construction", the 1X4's will be an equally important feature in competition "destruction"! :))))) Good luck to all, and may every single operator and t; /archives//html/RTTY/2003-02/msg00289.html (6,400 bytes)
42. [RTTY] K4WW NAQP (score: 136): Author: k4ww at arrl.net (Shelby Summerville); Date: Sun Feb 23 08:14:52 2003; Best "claimed" effort to date! Activity seems to be on the increase, and 12% of my contacts were "new" (stations never worked before on RTTY). Thanks to all for participating, and apologies to those; /archives//html/RTTY/2003-02/msg00301.html (6,601 bytes)
43. [RTTY] SO2R Question (score: 136): Author: k4ww at arrl.net (Shelby Summerville); Date: Sun Feb 23 14:24:50 2003; "Stephen E. Wojton" <swojton@wzrd.com" wrote: "Something in the software that does not allow one rig to transmit while the other one is ? Or do we just go by an honor system ?" When software writers; /archives//html/RTTY/2003-02/msg00318.html (7,450 bytes)
44. [RTTY] NAQP Nitty Gritty RTTY Team score (score: 136): Author: k4ww at arrl.net (Shelby Summerville); Date: Mon Feb 24 18:54:51 2003; Don Hill AA5AU <aa5au@bellsouth.net wrote: "If so, it appears the 1x4's were a bit thin, maybe they should have brought a bigger stick to this rumble!" Congratulations to Nitty Gritty RTTY Team for w; /archives//html/RTTY/2003-02/msg00351.html (7,281 bytes)
45. [RTTY] NAQP RTTY Team Score (score: 136): Author: k4ww at arrl.net (Shelby Summerville); Date: Mon Feb 24 19:18:06 2003; Possibly we should have "brought a bigger stick", or possibly "you ain't seen nothing yet"? Lots of great scores, and congratulations to all! 1X4's W1ZT - 78676 K4WW - 70811 WX4TM - 68000 K4GMH - 553; /archives//html/RTTY/2003-02/msg00353.html (6,313 bytes)
46. [RTTY] Log Confirmation (score: 136): Author: k4ww at arrl.net (Shelby Summerville); Date: Tue Feb 25 12:49:37 2003; "Has anyone received a log confirmation??" None received here. C'Ya, Shelby; /archives//html/RTTY/2003-02/msg00361.html (7,012 bytes)
47. [RTTY] SO2R (again) (score: 136): Author: k4ww at arrl.net (Shelby Summerville); Date: Sat Jan 25 12:21:38 2003; Don Hill AA5AU" <aa5au@bellsouth.net wrote: " I would support adding a new SO1R class. You could start and set your own records. We could have an SOAB class as we always do and then have an SO1R clas; /archives//html/RTTY/2003-01/msg00351.html (9,298 bytes)
48. [RTTY] Re: [CQ-Contest] So2R--try writing a rule separating SO2R (score: 136): Author: k4ww at arrl.net (Shelby Summerville); Date: Sun Jan 26 03:51:42 2003; "W. Wright, W5XD" <w5xd@writelog.com wrote: "In my opinion its time to either shut up or do something. So I'd like to see an advocate of the separate SO2R category post a definition of SO2R IN WRITIN; /archives//html/RTTY/2003-01/msg00372.html (7,639 bytes)
49. [RTTY] Re: [CQ-Contest] So2R--try writing a rule separating SO2R (score: 136): Author: k4ww at arrl.net (Shelby Summerville); Date: Sun Jan 26 10:23:08 2003; "When will any/all understand that there is no "campaign" to separate SO2R?" What I intended to say is: "no campaign to restrict or penalize"! Separate--yes Restrict or penalize--not at all C'Ya, She; /archives//html/RTTY/2003-01/msg00383.html (7,332 bytes)
50. [RTTY] New Master RTTY database & Friend.ini file (score: 136): Author: k4ww at arrl.net (Shelby Summerville); Date: Sat Aug 16 11:15:44 2003; "K4SB" <k4sb@earthlink.net> wrote: "Fellows, if your name is not the one you want to use" "You can call me BO, you can call me MO, you can call me for a meal, just call me!" Ed, just in case no one h; /archives//html/RTTY/2002-11/msg00201.html (6,949 bytes)
51. [RTTY] K4WW SOABHP (score: 136): Author: k4ww at arrl.net (Shelby Summerville); Date: Mon Aug 18 06:42:59 2003; Time spent "on the air" was less than last year, therefore score is also less. With all of the JA's active, I worked 62, it made me wonder if this was JARTS? If not for the JA's and other Far East st; /archives//html/RTTY/2002-11/msg00229.html (7,448 bytes)
52. [RTTY] AA5AU SARTG Score (score: 136): Author: k4ww at arrl.net (Shelby Summerville); Date: Mon Aug 18 20:12:27 2003; "Don Hill AA5AU" <aa5au@bellsouth.net> wrote: "What really pushed me to compete hard in the last two periods was a US station with a 5 callsign not signing / portable the area he was in." Until conte; /archives//html/RTTY/2002-11/msg00239.html (7,795 bytes)
53. [RTTY] AA5AU SARTG Score (score: 136): Author: k4ww at arrl.net (Shelby Summerville); Date: Tue Aug 19 17:48:35 2003; "Barry " <w2up@mindspring.com> wrote: "I have earned a 1x2 callsign. I do not wish to add 2 more characters to my callsign just for a contest." Then please explain, from September 2003 CQ. Results 20; /archives//html/RTTY/2002-11/msg00268.html (8,376 bytes)

Current List: 41 - 53
Page: [1] [2] [3]