Mail Archive Search: <+from:k4ww@arrl.net>

Results:

References: [ +from:k4ww@arrl.net: 527 ]

Total 527 documents matching your query.

341. Re: [RTTY] RU where was NV? (score: 1): Author: "Shelby Summerville" <k4ww@arrl.net>; Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2007 17:42:43 -0500; Worked: W6SA NV 1841 15 meters Second topic: Earl, N5ZM asked: "Should we edit the cabrillo file and add a /W7?" IMHO, any editing, post contest, is not, or should not, be allowed? Anything that effe; /archives//html/RTTY/2007-01/msg00103.html (7,099 bytes)
342. Re: [RTTY] North Dakota was missing in the ARRL RTTY Round Up (score: 1): Author: "Shelby Summerville" <k4ww@arrl.net>; Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 05:47:48 -0500; "The pile ups of people looking for ND on RTTY would be huge!" Not necessarily? I thought the same thing, after 2000 RU, regarding NV, and immediately started plans for operating 2001 RU, from K5RC,; /archives//html/RTTY/2007-01/msg00122.html (7,251 bytes)
343. Re: [RTTY] Why is it... (score: 1): Author: "Shelby Summerville" <k4ww@arrl.net>; Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2007 04:21:10 -0500; m5aav@btinternet.com wrote: "Why is it that some people will insist on having a two hour discussion when they 'think' they have worked you before in a contest, rather than just giving an exchange." S; /archives//html/RTTY/2007-01/msg00219.html (8,804 bytes)
344. Re: [RTTY] VU7RG Logs (score: 1): Author: "Shelby Summerville" <k4ww@arrl.net>; Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2007 12:59:35 -0500; pcooper wrote: "It must have been quite a confusing time for them as well" Not only confusing, but I can only imagine their sadness at having to terminate the DXPedetion, and leave the islands, witho; /archives//html/RTTY/2007-01/msg00262.html (6,571 bytes)
345. Re: [RTTY] Gripe of the Day (score: 1): Author: "Shelby Summerville" <k4ww@arrl.net>; Date: Sun, 28 Jan 2007 15:26:48 -0500; Rick Mintz wrote: "The station in question will remain forever nameless. At least he/she is a good operator otherwise." Why should they remain nameless, especially to the contest manager? Peer pressu; /archives//html/RTTY/2007-01/msg00298.html (7,172 bytes)
346. Re: [RTTY] WPX RTTY (score: 1): Author: "Shelby Summerville" <k4ww@arrl.net>; Date: Wed, 7 Feb 2007 05:00:23 -0500; Dick, your advice is mostly "preaching to the choir"! While it may not apply to WPX, I suggest that for any/all other contests, where the callsign used is that of the operator, other than the Multi-O; /archives//html/RTTY/2007-02/msg00055.html (15,290 bytes)
347. Re: [RTTY] W7WHY WPX RTTY (score: 1): Author: "Shelby Summerville" <k4ww@arrl.net>; Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2007 05:50:04 -0500; Tom Osborne wrote: "Seems like most of the stations are taking all the LF/CR's out of the end of the macro's." "guilty as charged" I changed my macros, for WPX! Although WPX is not a good contest to; /archives//html/RTTY/2007-02/msg00133.html (7,405 bytes)
348. Re: [RTTY] WPX contest (score: 1): Author: "Shelby Summerville" <k4ww@arrl.net>; Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2007 05:04:07 -0500; Dick White wrote: "I sometimes forgot to hit the space bar to put the next serial number up to be sent, so some serial numbers went out as "000" Thanks for posting this information, Dick. I received; /archives//html/RTTY/2007-02/msg00172.html (7,282 bytes)
349. Re: [RTTY] WPX 2007 (score: 1): Author: "Shelby Summerville" <k4ww@arrl.net>; Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2007 17:14:12 -0500; Jim Reisert AD1C wrote: "Create a keyboard macro for rttycontesting.com. If you work someone not in the master call database, send the macro to him/her. Or send personal E-mail after the contest" Dep; /archives//html/RTTY/2007-02/msg00208.html (8,320 bytes)
350. Re: [RTTY] 160 (score: 1): Author: "Shelby Summerville" <k4ww@arrl.net>; Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2007 06:05:27 -0500; "Bill Turner wrote: "I would love to see such a contest, but I think a club or similar organization should sponsor it. I wonder if TARA would be interested?" At one time, recently, TARA inquired, not; /archives//html/RTTY/2007-02/msg00289.html (7,944 bytes)
351. Re: [RTTY] 5C5W from Morroco (score: 1): Author: "Shelby Summerville" <k4ww@arrl.net>; Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2007 06:17:49 -0500; This was forwarded, to the reflector, by AD1C. "The friend Mohamed CN8KD will be operate the CQ WPX RTTY with a special call 5C5W , its the first time that the prefix 5C5 is used in Morocco. his oper; /archives//html/RTTY/2007-02/msg00290.html (7,508 bytes)
352. Re: [RTTY] 160 (score: 1): Author: "Shelby Summerville" <k4ww@arrl.net>; Date: Sun, 18 Feb 2007 12:48:36 -0500; MRBILL1953@aol.com wrote: "As it was mentioned on here earlier TARA now allows 160 Meter operation during its TARA Melee in December." As TARA Melee is patterned after ARRL RTTY Roundup, with no sepa; /archives//html/RTTY/2007-02/msg00316.html (7,809 bytes)
353. Re: [RTTY] 160 (score: 1): Author: "Shelby Summerville" <k4ww@arrl.net>; Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2007 17:01:31 -0500; Tree wrote: "Having it on a weekend without any other contest activity would probably give you the best shot at having sufficient activity to make it a success as there just aren't a lot of 160 stati; /archives//html/RTTY/2007-02/msg00354.html (8,672 bytes)
354. Re: [RTTY] 160 (score: 1): Author: "Shelby Summerville" <k4ww@arrl.net>; Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2007 18:09:25 -0500; Bill Turner wrote: ""And remember, to the best of my knowledge the first WAS and DXCC on 160 RTTY has yet to be earned. Who will be first?" Even though I have attained WAS, on 160 CW, I am still far,; /archives//html/RTTY/2007-02/msg00360.html (9,304 bytes)
355. Re: [RTTY] 160 (score: 1): Author: "Shelby Summerville" <k4ww@arrl.net>; Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2007 05:48:21 -0500; Bill Coleman wrote: "The most logical contest to incorporate 160m would be the NAQP -- where 6-band capability and the ability to find and/or pass multipliers is crucial to making top scores." Point,; /archives//html/RTTY/2007-02/msg00366.html (9,223 bytes)
356. [RTTY] Log Submission (score: 1): Author: "Shelby Summerville" <k4ww@arrl.net>; Date: Sun, 25 Feb 2007 09:27:34 -0500; NAQP RTTY logs are to be uploaded: http://www.ncjweb.com/naqplogsubmit.php not sent to me!!! Shelby Summerville, K4WW Contest Manager NAQP RTTY _______________________________________________ RTTY ma; /archives//html/RTTY/2007-02/msg00397.html (6,285 bytes)
357. [RTTY] Fw: 3830 (score: 1): Author: "Shelby Summerville" <k4ww@arrl.net>; Date: Sun, 25 Feb 2007 15:00:18 -0500; Just received this from WA7BNM. I discovered an e-mail server problem this morning, but didn't realize until just now that the links to the forms were down. It's up now. 73 de Bruce, WA7BNM (bhorn@ho; /archives//html/RTTY/2007-02/msg00402.html (6,817 bytes)
358. [RTTY] NAQP Logs (score: 1): Author: "Shelby Summerville" <k4ww@arrl.net>; Date: Sun, 25 Feb 2007 18:38:33 -0500; I've received an extraordinary amount of email logs, that I've never before received. I suggest that all participants visit http://www.ncjweb.com/rttynaqplogs.php to make sure that your logs were rec; /archives//html/RTTY/2007-02/msg00408.html (6,328 bytes)
359. [RTTY] NAQP Logs (score: 1): Author: "Shelby Summerville" <k4ww@arrl.net>; Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2007 04:27:54 -0500; I wrote: "I've received an extraordinary amount of email logs. I suggest that all participants visit http://www.ncjweb.com/rttynaqplogs.php to make sure that your logs were received, at the proper lo; /archives//html/RTTY/2007-02/msg00412.html (7,447 bytes)
360. Re: [RTTY] NAQP Logs (score: 1): Author: "Shelby Summerville" <k4ww@arrl.net>; Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2007 18:14:35 -0500; Jim Reisert AD1C wrote: "In Writelog, you can create the Cabrillo log and have the log E-mailed to the sponsor, all in a couple of button presses. It does now know about the web form." I presume you; /archives//html/RTTY/2007-02/msg00419.html (7,274 bytes)

Current List: 341 - 360
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] [17] [18] [19] [20]