Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:k4ww@arrl.net: 527 ]

Total 527 documents matching your query.

221. Re: [RTTY] 4U1UN 5 June 1410z (score: 1)
Author: "Shelby Summerville" <k4ww@arrl.net>
Date: Sun, 5 Jun 2005 11:32:21 -0400
Don Hill AA5AU wrote: "A picture of the bride & groom" Dang..."y'all clean up good"! :>))) C'Ya, Shelby - K4WW _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com ht
/archives//html/RTTY/2005-06/msg00032.html (7,223 bytes)

222. Re: [RTTY] 4U1UN 5 June 1410z (score: 1)
Author: "Shelby Summerville" <k4ww@arrl.net>
Date: Sun, 5 Jun 2005 11:36:11 -0400
A short visit to http://www.qsl.net/pathfinder/ will solve about 99.9% of your "QSL via" questions! It's free!!! C'Ya, Shelby - K4WW _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list
/archives//html/RTTY/2005-06/msg00033.html (7,011 bytes)

223. Re: [RTTY] RTTY Digest, Vol 30, Issue 4 (score: 1)
Author: "Shelby Summerville" <k4ww@arrl.net>
Date: Sun, 5 Jun 2005 13:22:48 -0400
Larry L Lindblom wrote: "He'll get plenty of orders once the honeymoon is over!" Wellllllll, it must be over? AA5AU spotting six meter DX, today! C'Ya, Shelby - K4WW _________________________________
/archives//html/RTTY/2005-06/msg00039.html (8,325 bytes)

224. Re: [RTTY] SO2R in ANARTS ??? (score: 1)
Author: "Shelby Summerville" <k4ww@arrl.net>
Date: Mon, 6 Jun 2005 14:33:07 -0400
Andrei Nevis wrote: "each band log is a pain, though" Visit http://www.users.bigpond.com/ctdavies/Rules2005.htm scroll down to "Notes on submitting logs by E-mail" Note: "Going Cabrillo has required
/archives//html/RTTY/2005-06/msg00055.html (7,209 bytes)

225. Re: [RTTY] Fwd: ANARTS F6IRF SOST HP (score: 1)
Author: "Shelby Summerville" <k4ww@arrl.net>
Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2005 11:46:19 -0400
f6irf@free.fr wrote: "As a summary it would be nice if the contest committee could specify:- the exact meaning of "single transmitter" (I.e. is SO2R allowed ?)" Patrick et all. I'm not sure that "ban
/archives//html/RTTY/2005-06/msg00103.html (7,850 bytes)

226. Re: [RTTY] Fwd: ANARTS F6IRF SOST HP (score: 1)
Author: "Shelby Summerville" <k4ww@arrl.net>
Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2005 12:19:13 -0400
Jerry Flanders wrote: "I just read them, and they aren't very clear to me - I didn't see exactly what a "single transceiver" is." This is what Webster's says: "consisting of one as opposed to or in c
/archives//html/RTTY/2005-06/msg00109.html (8,205 bytes)

227. Re: [RTTY] FD Freqs for PSK (score: 1)
Author: "Shelby Summerville" <k4ww@arrl.net>
Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2005 17:26:24 -0400
With conditions the way they are, and Field Day, activity as it usually is, I suspect CW stations will be found up, and beyond, the "normal" PSK/RTTY frequencies? Good luck to all...I'm gonna be "coo
/archives//html/RTTY/2005-06/msg00206.html (6,710 bytes)

228. Re: [RTTY] FD 2005 RTTY/PSK Observations (score: 1)
Author: "Shelby Summerville" <k4ww@arrl.net>
Date: Sun, 26 Jun 2005 17:01:24 -0400
Dick Kriss, AA5VU wrote: "Rather than taking the time to say 1D stations should not work 1D stations in FD I just logged the QSO and moved on to the next QSO. I finally got around the problem by chan
/archives//html/RTTY/2005-06/msg00222.html (8,277 bytes)

229. [RTTY] NAQP RTTY (score: 1)
Author: "Shelby Summerville" <k4ww@arrl.net>
Date: Tue, 5 Jul 2005 21:26:25 -0400
Team organizers, don't forget to register your team(s), prior to the contest, at: http://www.ncjweb.com/rttynaqpteamreg.php You will receive an email confirmation that your team is registered. If you
/archives//html/RTTY/2005-07/msg00066.html (7,139 bytes)

230. [RTTY] NAQP RTTY Results (score: 1)
Author: "Shelby Summerville" <k4ww@arrl.net>
Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2005 06:03:13 -0400
I failed to include the SO "top ten", so here it is. Sorry, for any inconvenience. C'Ya, Shelby - K4WW Call Score QSO's/Mults 80 40 20 15 10 K3MM 149,574 771/194 179/49 273/53 211/52 86/33 22/7 AA5AU
/archives//html/RTTY/2005-07/msg00109.html (6,889 bytes)

231. Re: [RTTY] [CQ-Contest] NAQP Off Times (score: 1)
Author: "Shelby Summerville" <k4ww@arrl.net>
Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2005 08:29:39 -0400
Chris Hurlbut wrote: "You live and learn, but I really do think the current penalty of losing 30 minutes of op time is too harsh for a 60 second (or less) screw up in the heat of battle." In all the
/archives//html/RTTY/2005-07/msg00110.html (7,708 bytes)

232. [RTTY] NAQP RTTY (score: 1)
Author: "Shelby Summerville" <k4ww@arrl.net>
Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2005 13:54:14 -0400
The July 2005 NAQP RTTY is scheduled for this weekend, July 16-17, 1800-0200 UTC. While primarily a North American contest, DX stations are certainly urged to participate. Plaques for qualifying (200
/archives//html/RTTY/2005-07/msg00114.html (8,929 bytes)

233. Re: [RTTY] NAQP RTTY (score: 1)
Author: "Shelby Summerville" <k4ww@arrl.net>
Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2005 06:33:23 -0400
Ron Hall gently reminded me: "NAQP RTTY ending time is 0600, not 0200 as per your message. Senior moment!" Guilty, on both charges!! NAQP RTTY running time 1800-0600, July 16-17. C'Ya, Shelby - K4WW
/archives//html/RTTY/2005-07/msg00119.html (7,468 bytes)

234. [RTTY] SO1R Team Score (score: 1)
Author: "Shelby Summerville" <k4ww@arrl.net>
Date: Sun, 17 Jul 2005 13:26:16 -0400
More than 100K less than our February score. Thanks to my teammates, and all that participated, enduring the "less than desirable" conditions. Without your participation, RTTY contesting would be not
/archives//html/RTTY/2005-07/msg00156.html (6,392 bytes)

235. Re: [RTTY] Logging NAQP DX stations (score: 1)
Author: "Shelby Summerville" <k4ww@arrl.net>
Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2005 12:53:45 -0400
Rick Mintz asked: "In NAQP RTTY, what is entered in the QTH field when working a DX station? I used "DX", is that correct?" The exchange logging requirements for NAQP are: 1) QSO with W/VE stations:
/archives//html/RTTY/2005-07/msg00173.html (7,252 bytes)

236. Re: [RTTY] Logging NAQP DX stations (score: 1)
Author: "Shelby Summerville" <k4ww@arrl.net>
Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2005 05:44:55 -0400
AA5AU wrote: The problem for me occurs when working non-USA/VE stations in NA. The rules are as Shelby says, Name + Country. What is acceptable with this?" WA7BNM replied to me, when I asked: "I pres
/archives//html/RTTY/2005-07/msg00192.html (7,609 bytes)

237. [RTTY] ARRL Contest Rate Sheet (score: 1)
Author: "Shelby Summerville" <k4ww@arrl.net>
Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 06:03:08 -0400
This was included in the August 27, 2005 ARRL Contest Rate Sheet, and is posted with permission from: Maty Weinberg Assistant to the Editorial and Production Manager ARRL: The National Association fo
/archives//html/RTTY/2005-07/msg00235.html (14,881 bytes)

238. Re: [RTTY] RTTY WAS (score: 1)
Author: "Shelby Summerville" <k4ww@arrl.net>
Date: Sun, 31 Jul 2005 09:44:09 -0400
KI8U wrote: "Other than contests and DX I don't operate much RTTY (my spelling and typing sucks) but would like to get WAS RTTY." Other than contests and DX, I don't operate ANY RTTY, or any other mo
/archives//html/RTTY/2005-07/msg00254.html (6,911 bytes)

239. Re: [RTTY] Interesting Buro SWL Card (score: 1)
Author: "Shelby Summerville" <k4ww@arrl.net>
Date: Sun, 14 Aug 2005 18:00:20 -0400
Peter Laws wrote: "Why don't we set up a regular "160 RTTY Activity Night"? I have nothing that will load on 160, but I'd listen at least." Which probably fits about 95% of most stations? I have enou
/archives//html/RTTY/2005-08/msg00074.html (9,005 bytes)

240. [RTTY] ARRL News (score: 1)
Author: "Shelby Summerville" <k4ww@arrl.net>
Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2005 06:34:11 -0400
http://www.arrl.org/news/stories/2005/08/12/108/?nc=1 As Ray and ICOM America have been doing this for NAQP RTTY, since 2002, what took ARRL so long to "get on board"? C'Ya, Shelby - K4WW ___________
/archives//html/RTTY/2005-08/msg00089.html (6,268 bytes)

Current List: 221 - 240
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] [17] [18] [19] [20]
This search system is powered by Namazu